home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!dsinc!dsinc!not-for-mail
- From: syd@dsi.com (Syd Weinstein)
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Subject: Re: Newmbox-length of mbox != spool mailbox length!!
- Date: 20 Nov 1992 13:42:45 -0500
- Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc., Huntingdon Valley, PA
- Lines: 13
- Message-ID: <1ejbj5INN8e7@dsinc.dsi.com>
- References: <1992Nov12.162136.14083@Logix.DE> <BxM6Go.GMs@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Nov13.152624.24401@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com> <1992Nov19.070429.2664@paradise.pegasus.com> <1992Nov19.201106.493@DSI.COM> <1992Nov20.133540.23865@fwi.uva.nl>
- Reply-To: syd@DSI.COM
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dsinc.dsi.com
-
- casper@fwi.uva.nl (Casper H.S. Dik) writes:
- >True, but shouldn't the Content-Length header be added on final
- >delivery? There are still sites munging message bodies out there
- >(think bitnet). If a sites MUAs honor it, it should be added on final
- >delivery at that site. That is the only way you can be certain that
- >the header is correct. If it's wrong, you may get yourself in a lot
- >of trouble.
- Which is why Elm now checks it, and as of PL11 doesn't get into trouble.
- --
- ========================================================================
- Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP Elm Coordinator - Current 2.4PL11
- Datacomp Systems, Inc. Projected 3.0 Release: ??? ?,1994
- syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd Voice: (215) 947-9900, FAX: (215) 938-0235
-