home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!wupost!crcnis1.unl.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!matt.ksu.ksu.edu!news
- From: holland@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Rich Holland)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
- Subject: Re: Comparing record types
- Message-ID: <1e6s51INNp16@matt.ksu.ksu.edu>
- Date: 15 Nov 92 13:05:37 GMT
- Article-I.D.: matt.1e6s51INNp16
- References: <92316.095144F0O@psuvm.psu.edu> <BxLM1t.841@cs.vu.nl> <1992Nov13.115158.18062@jyu.fi>
- Organization: Kansas State University
- Lines: 15
- NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu
-
- sakkinen@jyu.fi (Markku Sakkinen) writes:
-
- >>That's right. '=' only applies to atomic types (scalar, floating point,
- >>string, set).
-
- >I wouldn't call sets and strings 'atomic', but that's nit-picking.
-
- Okay, someone wanna clue me in here? What's an "atomic" type? I'd only
- heard of ordinal and scalar until now...
-
- --
- Rich Holland | INTERNET: holland@matt.ksu.ksu.edu
- 100 Jardine Terr, Apt A7 | BITNET : holland@ksuvm
- Manhattan, KS 66502-3357 | UUCP : ...!rutgers!matt.ksu.ksu.edu!holland
- char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
-