home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!pop.stat.purdue.edu!hrubin
- From: hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin)
- Subject: Indirection
- Message-ID: <Bxyut0.Jo@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (USENET News)
- Organization: Purdue University Statistics Department
- References: <id.6S0V.FKH@ferranti.com> <Bxv2t2.4FH@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <id.GT2V.7OE@ferranti.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:58:11 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <id.GT2V.7OE@ferranti.com> peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes:
-
- ..........................
-
- >Personally, I think that making indirection a prefix operator was a bigger
- >mistake than any of these.
-
- Certainly not from the standpoint of English speakers. As I understand it,
- *x in C denotes the object referred to by x, the object "found" AT x. Thus,
- @x would have been at least a somewhat logical notation, at least relatively
- easily understood by users, as well as easy for parsing, etc.
- --
- Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN47907-1399
- Phone: (317)494-6054
- hrubin@snap.stat.purdue.edu (Internet, bitnet)
- {purdue,pur-ee}!snap.stat!hrubin(UUCP)
-