home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- From: nikki@trmphrst.demon.co.uk (Nikki Locke)
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!trmphrst.demon.co.uk!nikki
- Subject: Re: Self Deletion
- Reply-To: nikki@trmphrst.demon.co.uk
- Distribution: world
- X-Mailer: cppnews $Revision: 1.20 $
- Organization: Trumphurst Ltd.
- Lines: 16
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:13:41 +0000
- Message-ID: <722549621snx@trmphrst.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@gate.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <By1Hwt.22p@cs.uiuc.edu> pjl@cs.uiuc.edu (Paul Lucas) writes:
- > *****> Self-deletion is (will-be) a no-no; static members are another
- > work-around.
- Really ?
-
- Tell me more !
-
- There is no reason at present, with any of the C++ compilers I have used,
- to prohibit self-deletion, provided that it is only done in certain
- places, viz at a point after which no members will be accessed.
-
- I expect Paul knows better - perhaps he would care to explain ?
-
- --
- Nikki Locke,Trumphurst Ltd.(PC and Unix consultancy) nikki@trmphrst.demon.co.uk
- trmphrst.demon.co.uk is NOT affiliated with ANY other sites at demon.co.uk.
-