home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.lang.c++:16413 comp.std.c++:1582
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!mole-end!mat
- From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
- Subject: Re: Proposal - enhancement for switch statement.
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.063845.26958@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
- Summary: ! ~break !!!!
- Organization: :
- References: <1992Nov16.004558.9855@muddcs.claremont.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 06:38:45 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Nov16.004558.9855@muddcs.claremont.edu>, dfoster@jarthur.claremont.edu (Derek R. Foster) writes:
- > In article <MCGRANT.92Nov15132747@rascals.stanford.edu> mcgrant@rascals.stanford.edu (Michael C. Grant) writes:
- > >In article <1992Nov15.190830.11622@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au>
- > >pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Peter Alexander Merel) writes:
-
- > 1) ... Make a 'break' the default, rather than fallthrough
- > being the default. Add a 'fallthrough' keyword (or extend the
- > meaning of the 'continue' keyword perhaps?) ...
-
- Please don't suggest ~break . I can imagine the (ahem) consternation
- in x3j16/WG21 at another ~-punned keyword.
- --
- (This man's opinions are his own.)
- From mole-end Mark Terribile
-
- mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
-