home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / comp / graphics / 11934 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-16  |  829 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!acf3!reznick
  2. From: reznick@acf3.nyu.edu (Daniel Reznick)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.graphics
  4. Subject: VOGL vs. VOGLE
  5. Message-ID: <BxtDx2.IJ6@cmcl2.nyu.edu>
  6. Date: 16 Nov 92 15:05:24 GMT
  7. Sender: notes@cmcl2.nyu.edu (Notes Person)
  8. Organization: New York University
  9. Lines: 14
  10. Nntp-Posting-Host: acf3.nyu.edu
  11.  
  12. What are the differences between VOGL and VOGLE?
  13.  
  14. I know that VOGL is meant to be a subset of the normal GL, but beyond
  15. this, is one of the two (VOGL/VOGLE) more complete, function wise?
  16. Does one perform better than another?
  17.  
  18. I am interested in working with one of these libraries on a PC with
  19. Borland C++ 3.1.  Does anyone have any experience/feedback or comments
  20. that would be pertinent to this combination?
  21.  
  22. Thanks much,
  23.  
  24. Daniel Reznick
  25. reznick@acf3.nyu.edu
  26.