home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: co.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!ucsu.Colorado.EDU!fcrary
- From: fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Frank Crary)
- Subject: Re: Don't boycott all of Colorado
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.200217.14655@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ucsu.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <1992Nov22.001635.11596@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> <Nov23.023035.1362@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 20:02:17 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <Nov23.023035.1362@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> freedman@cs.colostate.edu writes:
- >>>prior to the ammendment, if he were to fire an employee based upon sexual
- >>>orientation, the employee would have had a valid legal claim of descrimination.
-
- >>And, without any specific laws to support the claim, an almost impossible
- >>job of willing such a suit.
-
- >regardless of how difficult it would be to win, they would have been able to at
- >least have their case heard. Now, it is illegal to listen!
-
- Actually, the real barrier would be "standing", a legal basis to sue, which
- courts require _before_ they hear a case.
-
- Frank Crary
- CU Boulder
-
-