home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: co.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!ucsu.Colorado.EDU!fcrary
- From: fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Frank Crary)
- Subject: Re: interesting thought (ammendment 2)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.074431.200@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ucsu.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <1992Nov19.201953.15295@col.hp.com> <Nov20.185127.67010@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 07:44:31 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <Nov20.185127.67010@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> freedman@cs.colostate.edu writes:
- >> Criteria originally instituted for special protection under
- >> Civil Rights Act of 1964:
- >> 1) Economic disadvantage,
- >> 2) Educational/
- >> 3) Cultural deprivation
- >> 4) Political Powerlessness.
-
- >If you continue telling us that homosexuality is a lifestyle, then wouldn't that
- >lifestyle be considered a culture? Isn't ammendment 2 Cultural deprivation?
-
- Even accepting the assertion, Amendment 2 isn't cultural deprivation:
- It doesn't directly do anything.
-
- Frank Crary
- CU Boulder
-
-