home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / co / general / 1793 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-17  |  1.2 KB  |  26 lines
  1. Newsgroups: co.general
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!ucsu.Colorado.EDU!fcrary
  3. From: fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Frank Crary)
  4. Subject: Re: Local beers (was: Info on local tavern.
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov17.030415.28843@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
  6. Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: ucsu.colorado.edu
  8. Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
  9. References: <1992Nov13.000427.19620@advtech.uswest.com> <1992Nov16.153947.5567@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Nov16.162621.7034@advtech.uswest.com>
  10. Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:04:15 GMT
  11. Lines: 13
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Nov16.162621.7034@advtech.uswest.com> mgooley@advtech.uswest.com (Mark. Gooley) writes:
  14. >Opinions?  Does anyone else think that the bottled Boulder Beer products
  15. >are bad, and are the ones they have on tap really better?
  16.  
  17. I'm not sure I'd call their bottled beers "bad." I define "bad" in terms
  18. of the popular brands: Miller, Budweiser, etc... Boulder's bottled
  19. beers are _much_ better than that. The're also no where close to, say,
  20. Anchor's Liberty Ale. I think "unexceptional" is a better lable than
  21. "bad"...
  22.  
  23.                                                  Frank Crary
  24.                                                  CU Boulder
  25.  
  26.