home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!snake.cs.uidaho.edu!dean
- From: dean@snake.cs.uidaho.edu (Dean Collins)
- Subject: Re: Brains of Models
- Keywords: beauty and brains
- References: <1992Nov13.102525.8843@ac.dal.ca> <92Nov14.174551.28725@acs.ucalgary.ca> <1992Nov15.185231.17480@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Sender: nobody@ctr.columbia.edu
- Organization: none
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 01:19:52 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.011952.18855@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- Reply-To: dean@snake.cs.uidaho.edu (Dean Collins)
- Distribution: na
- X-Posted-From: clearwater.cs.uidaho.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu
- Lines: 19
-
- Handsome David Chou writes:
- |> Well, I don't think the equation beautiful = dumb is an iron law, but in
- |> general, I've found that humans tend to be average overall, and if that
- |> means you are very smart, another aspect of you (ie. looks) tends to suffer.
- |>
- [stuff deleted for brevity]
- |> -Dave
-
- Him: "Gee, you're beautiful."
- Her: "Are you calling me stupid?!"
- --
- (from the movie "The Quiet Earth" :-)
-
-
- I disagree completly with this concept. It's the whole "dumb blonde" thing
- all over. It is impossible to make assumptions about intelligence based on
- looks.
- --
- (Dashing :-) Dean
-