home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
- Path: sparky!uunet!well!moon!pixar!good
- From: good@pixar.com (If you tell the truth you won't have to remember anything.)
- Subject: Re: Brains of Models
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.183326.1452@pixar.com>
- Keywords: beauty and brains
- Sender: news@pixar.com (Usenet Newsmaster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hogey.pixar.com
- Organization: Pixar - Pt. Richmond, CA USA
- References: <1992Nov13.102525.8843@ac.dal.ca> <92Nov14.174551.28725@acs.ucalgary.ca> <1992Nov15.185231.17480@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:33:26 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov15.185231.17480@husc3.harvard.edu> dchou@husc11.harvard.edu (David Chou) writes:
- :
- :Anyone else want to debunk the myth of beautiful = dumb? I'm now
- :quite tired of being the only person in this group who speaks out
- :along these lines.
-
- You're not the only one. A few weeks ago I posted the remarks of a model,
- who was a NASA computer scientist, stating that it made it hard to do her
- job when people treated her as though she were stupid.
-
- Face it. Anybody who can generalize the intelligence of a person by their
- appearance is at best a poor observer and most likely stupid themselves. I
- haven't found any correlation, and I doubt there is one.
-
- Anybody with that kind of attitude is unlikely to find work photographing
- models, and if they do their pictures aren't likely to be much good. Even
- if the model you're working with is as thick as two short planks, you aren't
- going to get much cooperation by treating her that way.
-
- --Craig
- --
- good@pixar.com
- Make Welfare as hard to get as Bulding Permits
-