home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!spcvxb!hsh!paul
- From: paul@hsh.com
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: Re: Expansion of alt.fan.rush-limbaugh proposed
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.175846.268@hsh.com>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 21:58:46 GMT
- References: <1992Nov14.161601.7874@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> <1992Nov16.180352.23544@ryn.mro4.dec.com>
- Organization: HSH Associates
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Nov16.180352.23544@ryn.mro4.dec.com>, shapiro@cfsctc.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro) writes:
- >
- > In article <1992Nov14.161601.7874@anomaly.sbs.risc.net>,
- > kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes...
- >
- >>alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.politics - (Unmoderated)
- >>alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.transcripts - (Moderated)
- >>alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show - (Unmoderated)
- >
- > I am opposed. In fact, I would like to see a SINGLE r-l newsgroup.
- >
- > The argument I have is that when you split up related topics into separate
- > groups, people wind up expanding their cross-posting and so we wind up with
- > even more redundancy to wade through.
- >
- > For example, when John posts the transcript, there are quite a few responses to
- > them. So, someone responding to his post would probably cross post it into one
- > other (if not all) newsgroups. This will 'snowball' and I perceive that all
- > that this would do is create a lot of redundancy.
-
- You're right, of course. So which should now be removed: alt.politics.clinton
- or alt.president.clinton? <g> (Now *there's* a straight line for somebody...)
-
- ------
-
- Paul Havemann, VP HSH Associates (201) 838-3330
- Internet: paul@hsh.com Compuserve: 70410,3507 AOL: HSH Assoc
- "Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the company."
-
- "He walks again by night! Out of the fog, into the smog -- doggedly...
- relentlessly... ruthlessly... toward his weekly meeting with The Unknown..."
-