home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9940 sci.physics:19146
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!uni-heidelberg!lauren!gsmith
- From: gsmith@lauren.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
- Subject: Re: ENGLE: up to his old tricks (>)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.140834.5349@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
- Keywords: Engle
- Sender: news@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (NetNews)
- Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
- References: <nate.814@psygate.psych.indiana.edu> <ged1.721807950@crux1.cit.cornell.edu> <nate.827@psygate.psych.indiana.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 14:08:34 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <nate.827@psygate.psych.indiana.edu>
- nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
-
- >Wasn't Dirac's relativistic QM a direct response to Einstein's
- >criticism?
-
- In what way was Dirac's stuff a response to criticism by Einstein?
- Anybody know about this?
-
- --
- Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University
- gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
-