home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / rushlim / 9935 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-18  |  943 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!clesun!dbernard
  2. From: dbernard@clesun.Central.Sun.COM (Dave Bernard)
  3. Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
  4. Subject: Re: Religious Right (was Re: Rush Limbaugh: Victory from Defeat)
  5. Message-ID: <13855@texsun.Central.Sun.COM>
  6. Date: 18 Nov 92 12:42:46 GMT
  7. References: <9799@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
  8. Sender: news@texsun.Central.Sun.COM
  9. Reply-To: dbernard@clesun.Central.Sun.COM
  10. Organization: Sun Microsystems
  11. Lines: 11
  12.  
  13.  
  14. >I've never heard anyone say "feminist left," either, but haven't you
  15. >heard of "radical feminists"? 
  16.  
  17. >I'm sorry, I just don't understand what your objection is here.
  18.  
  19. The point was the media's use of "religious right" and not "feminist left,"
  20. for example.  Nor does the media ever use the word "radical feminist" when
  21. referring to organizations like NOW, for example.  Can't a feminist be of
  22. a rightist slant also, or does "feminist"="feminist left?"
  23.  
  24.