home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9759 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8642
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!charnel!olivea!spool.mu.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu!pitt.edu!dejst5
- From: dejst5+@pitt.edu (David E Joslin)
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: Name calling (Was: If character isn't an issue ...)
- Message-ID: <9680@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
- Date: 15 Nov 92 18:24:12 GMT
- References: <1992Oct28.065803.1769@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1122@bug.UUCP> <Bxqsoo.Cy8@ns1.nodak.edu>
- Sender: news+@pitt.edu
- Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: University of Pittsburgh
- Lines: 24
-
- green@plains.NoDak.edu (Brad Green) writes:
- >Have you noticed the clowns that supported Clinton so rabidly still haven't
- ^^^^^^
- >heard the election's over? They still keep up the childish namecalling like
- >a bunch of spoiled brats. Come on children, you're supposed to be more
- >mature than that, at least discuss your objections like adults.
-
- I see. Now that Clinton has won, the liberals should stand back
- and let the conservatives do all the name calling?
-
- But what about those of us who, although Republicans, were so disgusted
- by Pat Puke-cannon and his ilk that we voted for Clinton? Can we be name
- callers or not? What about those of us who are conservative without
- being followers of Pat Rawburpson and the Coercion Coalition? What about
- those Republicans who just couldn't stomach a President Dan Quayle? Or
- those of us who listen to Retch Lymphnode, but are not Limbots?
-
- You can see why I'm confused about whether or not I am allowed to indulge
- in name calling or not. I'm anxiously awaiting your clarification.
-
- David
- Anagrams:
- Presiddent Dan Quuaaiyl ==> End USA Quality and Pride.
- Rush Limbaugh Fans ==> Laugh, F------ Mush Brains!
-