home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!bradley.bradley.edu!camelot!grendel
- From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
- Subject: Re: Malcom the Tenth
- Message-ID: <grendel.722394958@camelot>
- Sender: news@bradley.bradley.edu
- Organization: Bradley University
- References: <1992Nov17.162322.24709@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> <grendel.722306819@camelot> <1992Nov21.031837.16924@seq.uncwil.edu> <By20DM.ErK@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <1992Nov21.230953.14125@seq.uncwil.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: 22 Nov 92 01:15:58 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In <1992Nov21.230953.14125@seq.uncwil.edu> session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions) writes:
-
- >greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) writes:
-
- >>You are correct. Lee is not a racist on the same level with Helms. But
- >>Malcolm X was. We can thank (?) Lee for not bringing that racist attitude
- >>into the 90s with his film.
-
- >It is debatable that the label "racist" can properly be applied to
- >Malcolm X.
-
- He spent a good deal of his time as leader of the Panthers railing against
- the "White devils". Though he later recanted, X was undoubtedly a racist
- during most of his career. The only way you could fail to acknowledge this
- is if you made the case that "there is no such thing as a black racist",
- a statement with which I strongly disagree.
-
-
-
-