home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:10132 talk.abortion:48934
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!news
- From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
- Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.014719.112785@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:47:19 GMT
- Distribution: usa
- News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.15 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
- Lines: 19
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <1992Nov17.171306.1666@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <Ef2zRZq00WBLE4rVkJ@andrew.cmu.edu> <sj45478@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1ejn23INN6vd@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: margoli.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
-
- In <1ejn23INN6vd@agate.berkeley.edu> don@ocf.berkeley.edu (Don Bromley) writes:
- >>[followups to talk.abortion]
- >
- >>Do you really think it's reasonable to ask all the married
- >>couples in the world to refrain from having sex if they don't
- >>want any more children? Do you really think you will succeed in
- >>convincing people not to have sex? Or could it be that you're
- >>recommending a course that is totally unworkable & unrealistic,
- >>and therefore ridiculous?
- >
- > This is classic liberal intellectual dishonesty. What fraction of
- > women who get abortions are married? Maybe 1%??
-
- This is classic ignorant stupidity. More like 20 - 30%, depending on
- what year you look at. And of what relevance is that, anyway? Saying
- that people who don't want to have [any more] children should refrain from
- sex *is* including *all* the married couples who don't want [more] kids.
- --
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-