home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:10004 alt.politics.bush:13951 alt.politics.clinton:17436 talk.politics.misc:60831
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!concert!duke!news.duke.edu!acpub.duke.edu!eyc
- From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: CHRONICLE editorial: Wed Nov 18 92
- Summary: Never settle for comfortable; always explore originality
- Message-ID: <7140@news.duke.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 04:55:31 GMT
- Sender: news@news.duke.edu
- Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
- Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.
- Lines: 112
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bio3.acpub.duke.edu
-
- Another Duke _Chronicle_ editorial
-
- Wed Nov 18 92
- Never settle for comfortable; always explore originality
- Dean Moyar (Trinity College -- arts and sciences -- Junior)
- "Cyprus Avenue" column
-
- When confronted with an important decision, we often must choose which
- of several considerations influencing the decision takes precedent over
- the rest. Many writers over the past two centuries have promoted the
- idea that our most important consideration should entail that we be true
- to ourselves; roughly speaking, to do what we will feel good about
- doing.
-
- We were recently offered an example of one such action when in a letter
- written from England during the Vietnam War, Bill Clinton wrote that by
- organizing protests he was doing what he felt was right. Clinton was
- trying to be true to himself, and admirably did what he felt was right
- despite the possible harm to his political career. What George Bush
- assumed and wanted us to assume is that Clinton's self had not changed
- in the intervening twenty-odd years -- that the same person who had felt
- compelled to protest against our country would now be leading it.
-
- The danger with this argument lies in attempting to use Clinton's prior
- decision as a clear indication of how he would act as president. Clinton
- would not admit that his actions were a mistake, but in doing so he was
- not saying that his actions now are governed by the same beliefs that
- motivated him in England. Implicit in his response was the idea that one
- cannot abstract a person's decision from half a lifetime ago and apply
- those decisions to the radically different here and now. The question
- arises, though, if Clinton now believes (this is purely hypothetical)
- that one shouldn't protest against the U.S. on foreign soil, should be
- call him a waffler and condemn him for inconsistency?
-
- How should we see the possibility of change over time of a person's
- beliefs and corresponding actions? If the person is at one time true to
- themselves in acting one way, and then some time later acts another way,
- should we insist that the latter action is phony?
-
- Some have said that our college years are the most important years of
- our lives. The main justification for this claim is that during college
- we are said to make substantial progress in our quest to "find
- ourselves." The idea is that over no definite span of time do we see
- such a change in our understanding of ourselves as we do in these
- critically formative years. That is, many who enter college with no idea
- where their lives are going leave with a firm sense of their occupation
- and how they wish to spend their adult lives.
-
- Regardless of how clear such a picture is for each of us, we all at some
- point have thought of what life will be like when each of us finds our
- so-called place in the world. The danger of this kind of thinking, and
- the danger of emphasizing college in this sense as the most crucial
- years of our lives, is that we tend to see our adult lives as static; we
- think of (and perhaps look forward to) a time when we will be satisfied
- with life, content to remain as we are.
-
- Fyodor Dostoevsky in his novel _The Idiot_ alludes to the embrace of
- such a life: "There is, indeed, nothing more annoying than to be, for
- instance, wealthy, of good family, nice-looking, fairly intelligent, and
- even good-natured, and yet to have ... not one idea of one's own, to be
- precisely 'like other people.'" Dostoevsky speaks of the person who is
- satisfied with being comfortable in life, not wanting to put an original
- imprint on the world. In addition, in writing of being 'like other
- people,' Dostoevsky invokes the idea that such a person tends to conform
- to the societal norm, thereby losing anything resembling individuality.
- In thus linking the notions of the static life and conforming to a
- generic form of existence, Dostoevsky points out the tendency of humans
- to be satisfied with themselves, resisting change because remaining the
- same is often the easiest way to exist.
-
- But it is an impoverished existence which upon finding happiness, sees
- itself as the be all and end all of life. We should not see the desire
- for personal growth as an admittance of weakness or unhappiness with how
- life is going. The maxim, "if it's not broken, don't fix it," does not
- imply for us that if we are happy with life we should not try to enlarge
- our experience of it.
-
- What Dostoevsky asks us to do is to never see our lives as complete, but
- to be aware that we can always create new aspects of ourselves.
- Originality need not be conceived of as doing things no one has ever
- done, but rather we can see it as doing things that we have never done
- and that we are doing for ourselves (and not simply to be "like other
- people"). Dostoevsky's stress on originality can then be seen as a call
- for us to constantly strive to go beyond our normal thoughts and
- actions. That is, we should see personal growth as a goal in itself, not
- allowing ourselves to become stale in our unwillingness to see the world
- in new ways.
-
- And significantly, this concept is especially relevant for those older
- than us. For it is precisely when we feel we are settled that we tend to
- be content with our lives and close ourselves to becoming more than we
- already are. And I would hope that our president-elect is not the same
- person he was 20 years ago, for an unoriginal person could hardly be a
- good president.
-
- Perhaps college is the most important time in our lives; for it is in
- college that we learn to see ourselves as capable of changing the ways
- we think and act. And as we strive to become independent adults, we
- should remember that those older than us often have as much to learn
- from us as we do from them, and that the ideal of the openness of the
- college mind should be an ideal extended into full-fledged adulthood.
-
- Happiness and unoriginality should not be correlative; we owe it to
- ourselves to explore the richness of originality of which the human
- spirit is capable.
- *** END ***
-
- --
- Emil Thomas Chuck eyc@acpub.duke.edu Biomedical Engineering 1993
- THANK GOD IT'S BASKETBALL SEASON!!!!!
- I don't have to have a 4.0 GPA to succeed in life because I'm
- good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.
-