home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.postmodern:2725 alt.cyberpunk:5864 talk.politics.theory:4956 alt.society.anarchy:738
- Newsgroups: alt.postmodern,alt.cyberpunk,talk.politics.theory,alt.society.anarchy
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!netnews
- From: nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson)
- Subject: Re: Singularity (Gordon's idea)
- Sender: usenet@apollo.hp.com (Usenet News)
- Message-ID: <BxvnAF.5HE@apollo.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:23:03 GMT
- References: <Bxo2E5.9sw@apollo.hp.com> <mXPauB5w165w@korova.freeside.com> <cvoidis.722029885@yorku.ca>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: c.ch.apollo.hp.com
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <cvoidis.722029885@yorku.ca> cvoidis@nexus.yorku.ca (Chris Voidis) writes:
-
- > The main point is not the subjective or objective points of view,
- >but the happening of truth in the work of art.
-
- Sometimes I refrain from ad hominem comments; sometimes I don't.
-
- But this posting is just calling out, "hit me, hit me".
-
- Amidst a series of postings about epistemology, how can anyone
- post anything like the above, using a term like "happening of
- truth" without even a suggestion of what they mean by "truth"?
- That IS after all, what we're discussing. What a dope.
-
- Let's suppose a painting contains a great truth. How do you
- tell?
-
-
- ---peter
-
-
-
-
-
-