home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.personals:22588 alt.personals.ads:2979
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!lupine!pepper!mellon
- From: mellon@ncd.com (Ted Lemon)
- Newsgroups: alt.personals,alt.personals.ads
- Subject: Re: REASON no Girls
- Message-ID: <mellon.722124121@pepper>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 22:02:01 GMT
- References: <BxA1CH.H94@access.digex.com> <1992Nov9.222551.26910@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> <1992Nov11.194304.26993@udel.edu> <1992Nov16.183445.3115@phx.mcd.mot.com>
- Sender: news@NCD.COM
- Followup-To: alt.personals
- Lines: 17
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pepper
-
- sherm@phx.mcd.mot.com (cassie) writes:
- >There is one difference I have found between women in
- >Computer Science/Engineering and the ``art'' subjects.
- >In GENERAL the women in Computer Science/Engineering
- >are smarter. Perhaps Hamid has a problem with smart women.
-
- Perhaps Hamid does have such a problem, but I find your statement quite
- offensive, nonetheless. My sister is working on her PhD in Art History
- right now, and she's definitely _not_ less intelligent than my Computer
- Science/Engineering friends. Less practical, maybe, but that's not the
- same thing. Shame on you for your bigotry.
-
- _MelloN_
- --
- mellon@ncd.com uunet!lupine!mellon
- Member of the League for Programming Freedom - to find out how software
- patents may cost you your right to program, contact lpf@uunet.uu.net
-