home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!att-out!oucsboss!oucsace!bwhite
- From: bwhite@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (William E. White )
- Newsgroups: alt.pagan
- Subject: Re: Who are we kidding?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.211953.27474@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 21:19:53 GMT
- References: <2B0A8245.16232@news.service.uci.edu> <1992Nov19.021352.25696@leela.cs.orst.edu> <2B0B3079.358@news.service.uci.edu>
- Organization: O.U., Harvard on the Hocking, Berkeley in the Boondocks!
- Lines: 85
-
- In article <2B0B3079.358@news.service.uci.edu> cortese@skid.ps.uci.edu (Janis Maria Cortese) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov19.021352.25696@leela.cs.orst.edu> casspa@atlantis.CS.ORST.EDU (Paul Cass) writes:
- >>In article <2B0A8245.16232@news.service.uci.edu> cortese@skid.ps.uci.edu (Janis Maria Cortese) writes:
- >>>
- >>>It's finished, people. We're just not going to change in thirty years,
- >>>face up to it. We're not the first evolutionary cul-de-sac that's ever
- >>>come down the pike. The dice rolled, and we came out, and it just
- >>>didn't work out. If we had 150 years or 200, maybe. But we are NOT
- >>>GOING TO CHANGE IN TIME. Think about it. Do you honestly think that
- >>>today's 10-year olds are going to suddenly have this mass jump in
- >>>consciousness despite being reared by today's 40-year olds and rise up
- >>>as one and go back to living in thatched-roof houses or at least give up
- >>>their Nintendos long enough to find out what's happening?
-
- >>Janis; You just have to do something about this pollyanna attitude of
- >>yours. |B{) Your article sounds like I felt after spending a summer
- >>of reading and researching environmental science. It took the better
- >>part of a month to regain my equilibrium and to decide that if the
- >>biosphere was going to go down the shitter at least I wouldn't flush.
-
- >How did you? I'm wondering and getting worried about how *I*'m going
- >to. This just really knocked me for a loop and had me off-kilter for
- >the whole day; it still does. I hope it doesn't last for a month, but I
- >wonder if it's ever going to go away.
-
- I remember when I stopped to look at the truth about exponential growth
- (notice how all predictions of population, food, natural resources, etc.,
- all say things like "at current rates of usage, oil will last for 300
- years"? Ever consider that "current rates of usage" go up exponentially
- each year? Do a little calculus and you'll be a bit surprised). I felt
- pretty awful about it all. Coupled with research into the environment,
- I too felt like the world was going to Hell in a Pinto.
-
- But there are some other things to consider. First off, anyone who tells
- you that any environmental change will happen suddenly is trying to sell
- you something. Depletion of natural resources, changes in birth rates,
- etc., will all happen slowly. Extraction of oil, for example, will simply
- become increasingly expensive; we'll never "run out" the way most people
- think. There will never be one day when we wake up and the ozone layer
- is gone; it'll happen gradually.
-
- Plus which, I don't believe in the "point of no return" philosophy. I do
- believe that, the longer we delay, the more it's going to cost us (both
- economically and socially). I really do believe in the wonder of modern
- science, I just think it's the negative aspects which have gotten all the
- publicity in the past, say, 2000 years. Yes, it'll be a long time before
- things get bad enough to the point where people all look and say, oh yes
- I want to do something about it. By then it'll take a lot of effort and
- a lot of time. But I think most problems are solvable.
-
- I believe we could exist right now on a solar-hydrogen economy (we can't
- *switch* to it now, but if we somehow were magically given the infra-
- structure for it, it would be feasible). We could probably also get rid
- of most of the radioactive waste, if we sat down and took the time and
- money to do it (I'm personally in favor of gravity torpedoes into a
- subduction zone). Similarly, I'm also a believer in biodegradation of
- toxins -- one of the possible positive benefits of genetics research
- may come in better engineered or bred biodegrading microbes.
-
- In short, what's needed is committment. Feeling disempowered about it
- is precisely what you *should not* do -- because then you just want to
- curl up and sleep, hoping it will all go away. This solves nothing, it
- helps nothing. If you really want to try and make things better for our
- descendents, work now to convince people that a) there is a problem, and
- b) it probably is solvable, but will require of work and research. On the
- other hand, I'm terrified to think of what would happen if everyone does
- nothing, until it's painfully obvious that we're on the road to extinction,
- and then some neofascist decides to blame the scientists, the thinkers, the
- different people among us, etc.
-
- Religion should be empowering, it should enforce one's connection with the
- surrounding physical environment and one's ability to influence it. The
- fact that most major religions today are precisely the opposite is, in my
- not-so-humble opinion, a big problem. We may be digging our own grave,
- but we're the ones doing it, not some abstract force, and we can undo it
- given the time and effort. This time and effort will happen sooner or
- later, I'd just prefer it sooner.
-
- >Janis
-
-
- --
- | Bill White +1-614-594-3434 | bwhite@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu |
- | 31 Curran Dr., Athens OH 45701 | bwhite@bigbird.cs.ohiou.edu (alternate) |
- | SCA: Erasmus Marwick, Dernehealde Pursuivant, Dernehealde, Middle Kingdom |
-