home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!mrgreen
- From: mrgreen@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (matthew green)
- Subject: Re: A better idea than most was (Re: People who take VR too seriously...)
- Message-ID: <mrgreen.722418925@munagin>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
- References: <9211201347.AA00270@hrt213.brooks.af.mil> <1992Nov22.013125.128339@zeus.calpoly.edu> <1992Nov22.021508.24360@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 07:55:25 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov22.013125.128339@zeus.calpoly.edu> asamonte@hertz.elee.calpoly.edu (Just some loser...) writes:
-
- >>In my opinion it's just called quality control. There are already tons
- >>of operators who are just given ops on a whim so they can me one, and
- >>/kill people or whatever.
-
- >So why create more? IRC only needs one or two sane operators on-line
- >to deal with routing problems, so there's no reason why csd needs one
- >at all. It doesn't matter how high the quality is if it's a useless
- >job.
-
- One or two sane ones in each hostmask.. We don't really want people
- trying to squit behind hostmasks do we..
-
- ..
-