home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!bnrgate!nott!torn!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!poe.acc.Virginia.EDU!rwd4f
- From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
- Subject: Re: The Moral Majority is Neither
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.154208.24885@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia
- References: <1992Nov11.064114.15827@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Nov11.15154 <1992Nov17.054027.29839@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:42:08 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- i must admit, a discussion about whether pictures of naked 10 year olds
- belong on a.p.b.erotica is more interesting than your typical alt.flame
- thread. So lets take a little survey, ed anger style:
-
- [ ] Yes, Rob, I agree with you and all the other God-fearing [tm] people
- in this country and on this net who say that there is no place for
- pictures of naked 10 year olds ANYWHERE in this great country. i think
- perverts who post such pictures should be strung up by their balls.
-
- [ ] No, Rob, I agree with Atheists of America and all the other namby-
- pamby liberals who think that ANYTHING, even fucking 10 year olds, is
- ok as long as it doesnt represent traditional, fmaily oriented,
- christian values.
-
-
-
-