home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!dunix.drake.edu!acad.drake.edu!vsg001
- From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
- Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.230226.1@acad.drake.edu>
- Lines: 26
- Sender: news@dunix.drake.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: acad.drake.edu
- Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
- References: <1992Nov13.042230.1@acad.drake.edu> <1409@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 05:02:26 GMT
-
- In article <1409@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
- > You guys have been arguing this "Bush didn't say that" horseshit
-
- "horseshit" Ah. Bill has enlarged his vocabulary. Excellent Bill. You have been
- listening to those "Power Tapes" by Tony Robbins haven't you?
-
- > What else could he have meant, Casper
- > the Phriendly Phantom? C'mon, give it a try.
-
- Ok. Here's a try: You have the attentionspan of an old man fornicating. You see
- wilbur, HE DIDN'T SAY THAT. That was in the original post. And if he did... so
- what? He's not president any more! You won ok? By continuing this pathetic
- attempt at wit and Socratic reasoning, you only further the point that you can
- only manage baseless arguements. So which is it, Billy Boy? Are you a moron or
- do you have the attentionspan of an old man fornicating? You decide... but
- alas, choose well for it is a decision that will stick for the rest of your
- life.
-
- > Oh, and while yer at it, enlighten us with your wonderful views
- > on original intent.
-
- Now, original intent, well, you just bring some point in the Constitution that
- you already are so willing to point at, and a Supreme Court decision, and I
- will happily debate it. Happy Hunting.
-
- --The Phantom
-