home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.callahans
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!ellis!mss2
- From: mss2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Michael S. Schiffer)
- Subject: Re: God and Science: The Ramblings of The Nightstalker
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.032801.16360@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: mss2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <1ea09rINNolh@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Nov17.174943.3622@data-io.com> <STEVE.92Nov17171300@styx.crc.ricoh.COM>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 03:28:01 GMT
- Lines: 66
-
- In article <STEVE.92Nov17171300@styx.crc.ricoh.COM> steve@crc.ricoh.COM (Stephen R. Savitzky) writes:
- >"Here's another shot at the 'moral relativism' debate," says the
- >Mandelbear. "Some folks believe that killing people is wrong, Period.
- >Some folks believe that killing people is ok sometimes, like if their
- >government tells them to. The conditions under which people will
- >allow their government to kill people vary from country to country as
- >well as from person to person. If that isn't moral relativism, I'm
- >not sure what is."
-
- "That can either be viewed as moral relativism or as nearer or
- farther approaches to true morality. The ancient Hebrews approximated
- Pi as 3. The Egyptians used another figure, I think 22/7. Different
- cultures have used differing approximations. Does that mean that the
- ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter has varied from
- culture to culture? No, it means that people have approximated it
- with greater or less success. A `mathematical relativist' might say
- that each of those values was right for his culture-- a mathematical
- absolutist would say that in Euclidean space there is only one value
- for Pi. `Write it out,' the relativist might demand-- but the
- absolutist can give only an approximation, however close.
-
- `Of course, this doesn't prove anything either way-- some
- things _are_ relative. `Man' and `homme' and `ish' and `andros' are
- not different approximations of the true word for male human being--
- they are simply different words from different, equal languages. But
- the existence of different moral standards among different people does
- not _disprove_ absolute morality either." Michael wonders if this
- topic is being revived, and hopes that the peace of exhaustion on the
- subject will continue to hold.
-
- >"Admittedly the Catholic Church has changed some since the days of the
- >Inquisition, but on the whole not very much. The belief structure is
- >still essentially the same, even if the practices have changed. Other
- >Christian sects differ in various ways that (again, as seen from
- >outside) don't matter very much.
-
- "Depends who you ask. Apparently, the question of whether or
- not they proselytize matters _very_ much to a number of outsiders
- hereabouts. Similarly, outsiders might care about the difference
- between a sect which called for the deaths of heretics and infidels
- and one which preached coexistence. And, of course, the differences
- are _supposed_ to be primarily important to those who are inside--
- they're over issues which outsiders don't even agree with them about
- the principles involved. Would a dictatorship care about whether
- proportional representation or `first past the post' geographic
- apportionment was the best way to choose a democratic legislature? Or
- conversely, would a democracy care whether an ideological dictatorship
- can better impose its will by directly controlling industry or by
- striking a deal with industrial leaders?"
-
- >"And many members of these various sects then have the gall to say
- >that their religion is the *only* valid source of morality! That if I
- >don't believe in their deity, I must have no morals at all. Now
- >*that's* what I call evil!
-
- "Sigh. People say lots of stupid things. But please note
- that there is a difference between claiming that God is the only
- source of morality and that a particular set of beliefs is."
-
- Michael
-
- --
- Michael S. Schiffer, LHN, FCS "Indeed I tremble for my country
- mss2@midway.uchicago.edu when I reflect that God is just."
- mike.schiffer@um.cc.umich.edu -- Thomas Jefferson, Notes on
- mss2@amber.uchicago.edu Virginia (1784)
-