home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.bbs
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!news.service.uci.edu!network.ucsd.edu!qualcom.qualcomm.com!qualcom!rdippold
- From: rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
- Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
- Message-ID: <rdippold.722482830@qualcom>
- Sender: news@qualcomm.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: qualcom.qualcomm.com
- Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
- References: <1992Nov11.134133.24287@uvm.edu> <721643537snx@sound.demon.co.uk> <1992Nov17.184131.60943@cc.usu.edu> <1992Nov20.085632.1@ttd.teradyne.com> <By4M4B.7pq@gator.rn.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 01:40:30 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
- >rice@ttd.teradyne.com writes:
- >>TBBS has much flexibility in presenting menus/screens/file areas/etc.
- >I wouldn't go that far -- you for example, can't put the time/date
- >in the menus
-
- Totally wrong.
-
- > nor can you have the menus spawn external applications.
-
- Correct for multiline.
-
- --
- A sick mind is not necessarily the sign of a clean desk.
-