home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!qualcom.qualcomm.com!network.ucsd.edu!usc!wupost!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!kludge!therat!spud!tom
- From: tom@spud.kludge.com (Tom Lemos)
- Newsgroups: alt.bbs
- Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
- Message-ID: <XsLauB4w165w@spud.kludge.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 10:13:20 PST
- References: <721643537snx@sound.demon.co.uk>
- Organization: T.T.L.F. San Francisco, CA
- Lines: 23
-
- Rob@sound.demon.co.uk (Robert J Barth) writes:
-
- > > TBBS is a commercial BBS package for MS/DR-DOS machines. It's primary
- > >strength is that it is written in 100% assembly language and is arguably
- > >o The only other limitation I can think of is Price.
- >
- > OK, here's my situation:
- > I'm running RemoteAccess (great s/w!), and I have:
- > 2 lines, both Courier Dual Standard V32bis/HST,
- > and they both run under desqview = 1 machine
- > Upgrading to 3 lines would mean either...
- > a. Netware, with Server, CDrom Server, 3 nodes = 5 machines
- > b. Netware Lite, Lantastic etc, 3 peer-peer nodes = 3 machines
- > c. TBBS ??? = 1 machine <grin>
- >
- > What would I need ? Multiplexors ? I've got the 2 external DSs, and
-
- Digiboards if you're gonna use TBBS. Turns one slot into 8. Real nice.
-
-
- Tom@spud.kludge.COM Tater Tot Liberation Front
- "People should be taught what is, not what should be." San Francisco,CA
- -Lenny Bruce +1.415.255.8340
-