home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.bbs
- Path: sparky!uunet!ornl!sunova!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!ssturgis
- From: ssturgis@netcom.com (Scott Sturgis)
- Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.182908.6261@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Nov11.134133.24287@uvm.edu> <721643537snx@sound.demon.co.uk> <Bxq2n6.AHt@gator.rn.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 18:29:08 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <Bxq2n6.AHt@gator.rn.com> larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
- >Rob@sound.demon.co.uk (Robert J Barth) writes:
- >
- >Can't you run more than 2 lines under Desview? There are drivers
- >for smartboards (DIgiboard for example) for DOS?
-
- On a single 486 it is possible but with the overhead of Desqview there may
- be performance penalties >
-
- >How about UNIX? You could run a multiuser operating systems
- >designed from the ground up to support multiple users tasks?
- >
- >With many UNIX based BBS's you get complete source code, and you
- >get the ability to support the operating of applications from
- >the bbs.
- >
-
- Larry not everyone is interested in UNIX
-
-