home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1997-11-26 | 154.9 KB | 4,036 lines |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group C. Newman
- Request for Comments: 2244 Innosoft
- Category: Standards Track J. G. Myers
- Netscape
- November 1997
-
-
- ACAP -- Application Configuration Access Protocol
-
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
- Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
- improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
- Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
- and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
-
- Copyright Notice
-
- Copyright (C) The Internet Society 1997. All Rights Reserved.
-
- Abstract
-
- The Application Configuration Access Protocol (ACAP) is designed to
- support remote storage and access of program option, configuration
- and preference information. The data store model is designed to
- allow a client relatively simple access to interesting data, to allow
- new information to be easily added without server re-configuration,
- and to promote the use of both standardized data and custom or
- proprietary data. Key features include "inheritance" which can be
- used to manage default values for configuration settings and access
- control lists which allow interesting personal information to be
- shared and group information to be restricted.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page i]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
-
-
-
- Table of Contents
-
-
-
- Status of this Memo ............................................... i
- Copyright Notice .................................................. i
- Abstract .......................................................... i
- ACAP Protocol Specification ....................................... 1
- 1. Introduction ............................................. 1
- 1.1. Conventions Used in this Document ........................ 1
- 1.2. ACAP Data Model .......................................... 1
- 1.3. ACAP Design Goals ........................................ 1
- 1.4. Validation ............................................... 2
- 1.5. Definitions .............................................. 2
- 1.6. ACAP Command Overview .................................... 4
- 2. Protocol Framework ....................................... 4
- 2.1. Link Level ............................................... 4
- 2.2. Commands and Responses ................................... 4
- 2.2.1. Client Protocol Sender and Server Protocol Receiver ...... 4
- 2.2.2. Server Protocol Sender and Client Protocol Receiver ...... 5
- 2.3. Server States ............................................ 6
- 2.3.1. Non-Authenticated State .................................. 6
- 2.3.2. Authenticated State ...................................... 6
- 2.3.3. Logout State ............................................. 6
- 2.4. Operational Considerations ............................... 7
- 2.4.1. Untagged Status Updates .................................. 7
- 2.4.2. Response when No Command in Progress ..................... 7
- 2.4.3. Auto-logout Timer ........................................ 7
- 2.4.4. Multiple Commands in Progress ............................ 8
- 2.5. Server Command Continuation Request ...................... 8
- 2.6. Data Formats ............................................. 8
- 2.6.1. Atom ..................................................... 9
- 2.6.2. Number ................................................... 9
- 2.6.3. String ................................................... 9
- 2.6.3.1. 8-bit and Binary Strings ................................. 10
- 2.6.4. Parenthesized List ....................................... 10
- 2.6.5. NIL ...................................................... 10
- 3. Protocol Elements ........................................ 10
- 3.1. Entries and Attributes ................................... 10
- 3.1.1. Predefined Attributes .................................... 11
- 3.1.2. Attribute Metadata ....................................... 12
- 3.2. ACAP URL scheme .......................................... 13
- 3.2.1. ACAP URL User Name and Authentication Mechanism .......... 13
- 3.2.2. Relative ACAP URLs ....................................... 14
- 3.3. Contexts ................................................. 14
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page ii]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 3.4. Comparators .............................................. 15
- 3.5. Access Control Lists (ACLs) .............................. 17
- 3.6. Server Response Codes .................................... 18
- 4. Namespace Conventions .................................... 21
- 4.1. Dataset Namespace ........................................ 21
- 4.2. Attribute Namespace ...................................... 21
- 4.3. Formal Syntax for Dataset and Attribute Namespace ........ 22
- 5. Dataset Management ....................................... 23
- 5.1. Dataset Inheritance ...................................... 23
- 5.2. Dataset Attributes ....................................... 24
- 5.3. Dataset Creation ......................................... 25
- 5.4. Dataset Class Capabilities ............................... 25
- 5.5. Dataset Quotas ........................................... 26
- 6. Command and Response Specifications ...................... 26
- 6.1. Initial Connection ....................................... 26
- 6.1.1. ACAP Untagged Response ................................... 26
- 6.2. Any State ................................................ 27
- 6.2.1. NOOP Command ............................................. 27
- 6.2.2. LANG Command ............................................. 28
- 6.2.3. LANG Intermediate Response ............................... 28
- 6.2.4. LOGOUT Command ........................................... 29
- 6.2.5. OK Response .............................................. 29
- 6.2.6. NO Response .............................................. 29
- 6.2.7. BAD Response ............................................. 30
- 6.2.8. BYE Untagged Response .................................... 30
- 6.2.9. ALERT Untagged Response .................................. 31
- 6.3. Non-Authenticated State .................................. 31
- 6.3.1. AUTHENTICATE Command ..................................... 31
- 6.4. Searching ................................................ 33
- 6.4.1. SEARCH Command ........................................... 33
- 6.4.2. ENTRY Intermediate Response .............................. 37
- 6.4.3. MODTIME Intermediate Response ............................ 38
- 6.4.4. REFER Intermediate Response .............................. 38
- 6.4.5. Search Examples .......................................... 38
- 6.5. Contexts ................................................. 39
- 6.5.1. FREECONTEXT Command ...................................... 39
- 6.5.2. UPDATECONTEXT Command .................................... 40
- 6.5.3. ADDTO Untagged Response .................................. 40
- 6.5.4. REMOVEFROM Untagged Response ............................. 41
- 6.5.5. CHANGE Untagged Response ................................. 41
- 6.5.6. MODTIME Untagged Response ................................ 42
- 6.6. Dataset modification ..................................... 42
- 6.6.1. STORE Command ............................................ 42
- 6.6.2. DELETEDSINCE Command ..................................... 45
- 6.6.3. DELETED Intermediate Response ............................ 45
- 6.7. Access Control List Commands ............................. 45
- 6.7.1. SETACL Command ........................................... 46
- 6.7.2. DELETEACL Command ........................................ 46
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page iii]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 6.7.3. MYRIGHTS Command ......................................... 47
- 6.7.4. MYRIGHTS Intermediate Response ........................... 47
- 6.7.5. LISTRIGHTS Command ....................................... 47
- 6.7.6. LISTRIGHTS Intermediate Response ......................... 48
- 6.8. Quotas ................................................... 48
- 6.8.1. GETQUOTA Command ......................................... 48
- 6.8.3. QUOTA Untagged Response .................................. 49
- 6.9. Extensions ............................................... 49
- 7. Registration Procedures .................................. 49
- 7.1. ACAP Capabilities ........................................ 50
- 7.2. ACAP Response Codes ...................................... 50
- 7.3. Dataset Classes .......................................... 51
- 7.4. Vendor Subtree ........................................... 51
- 8. Formal Syntax ............................................ 52
- 9. Multi-lingual Considerations ............................. 61
- 10. Security Considerations .................................. 62
- 11. Acknowledgments .......................................... 63
- 12. Authors' Addresses ....................................... 63
- Appendices ........................................................ 64
- A. References ............................................... 64
- B. ACAP Keyword Index ....................................... 66
- C. Full Copyright Statement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page iv]
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- ACAP Protocol Specification
-
- 1. Introduction
-
- 1.1. Conventions Used in this Document
-
- In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
- server respectively. If such lines are wrapped without a new "C:" or
- "S:" label, then the wrapping is for editorial clarity and is not
- part of the command.
-
- The key words "REQUIRED", "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
- and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in "Key
- words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" [KEYWORDS].
-
- 1.2. ACAP Data Model
-
- An ACAP server exports a hierarchical tree of entries. Each level of
- the tree is called a dataset, and each dataset is made up of a list
- of entries. Each entry has a unique name and may contain any number
- of named attributes. Each attribute within an entry may be single
- valued or multi-valued and may have associated metadata to assist
- access and interpretation of the value.
-
- The rules with which a client interprets the data within a portion of
- ACAP's tree of entries are called a dataset class.
-
- 1.3. ACAP Design Goals
-
- ACAP's primary purpose is to allow users access to their
- configuration data from multiple network-connected computers. Users
- can then sit down in front of any network-connected computer, run any
- ACAP-enabled application and have access to their own configuration
- data. Because it is hoped that many applications will become ACAP-
- enabled, client simplicity was preferred to server or protocol
- simplicity whenever reasonable.
-
- ACAP is designed to be easily manageable. For this reason, it
- includes "inheritance" which allows one dataset to inherit default
- attributes from another dataset. In addition, access control lists
- are included to permit delegation of management and quotas are
- included to control storage. Finally, an ACAP server which is
- conformant to this base specification should be able to support most
- dataset classes defined in the future without requiring a server
- reconfiguration or upgrade.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 1]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- ACAP is designed to operate well with a client that only has
- intermittent access to an ACAP server. For this reason, each entry
- has a server maintained modification time so that the client may
- detect changes. In addition, the client may ask the server for a
- list of entries which have been removed since it last accessed the
- server.
-
- ACAP presumes that a dataset may be potentially large and/or the
- client's network connection may be slow, and thus offers server
- sorting, selective fetching and change notification for entries
- within a dataset.
-
- As required for most Internet protocols, security, scalability and
- internationalization were important design goals.
-
- Given these design goals, an attempt was made to keep ACAP as simple
- as possible. It is a traditional Internet text based protocol which
- massively simplifies protocol debugging. It was designed based on
- the successful IMAP [IMAP4] protocol framework, with a few
- refinements.
-
- 1.4. Validation
-
- By default, any value may be stored in any attribute for which the
- user has appropriate permission and quota. This rule is necessary to
- allow the addition of new simple dataset classes without
- reconfiguring or upgrading the server.
-
- In some cases, such as when the value has special meaning to the
- server, it is useful to have the server enforce validation by
- returning the INVALID response code to a STORE command. These cases
- MUST be explicitly identified in the dataset class specification
- which SHOULD include specific fixed rules for validation. Since a
- given ACAP server may be unaware of any particular dataset class
- specification, clients MUST NOT depend on the presence of enforced
- validation on the server.
-
- 1.5. Definitions
-
-
- access control list (ACL)
- A set of identifier, rights pairs associated with an object. An
- ACL is used to determine which operations a user is permitted to
- perform on that object. See section 3.5.
-
- attribute
- A named value within an entry. See section 3.1.
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 2]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- comparator
- A named function which can be used to perform one or more of
- three comparison operations: ordering, equality and substring
- matching. See section 3.4.
-
- context
- An ordered subset of entries in a dataset, created by a SEARCH
- command with a MAKECONTEXT modifier. See section 3.3.
-
- dataset
- One level of hierarchy in ACAP's tree of entries.
-
- dataset class specification
- The rules which allow a client to interpret the data within a
- portion of ACAP's tree of entries.
-
- entry
- A set of attributes with a unique entry name. See section 3.1.
-
- metadata
- Information describing an attribute, its value and any access
- controls associated with that attribute. See section 3.1.2.
-
- NIL This represents the non-existence of a particular data item.
-
- NUL A control character encoded as 0 in US-ASCII [US-ASCII].
-
- octet
- An 8-bit value. On most modern computer systems, an octet is
- one byte.
-
- SASL Simple Authentication and Security Layer [SASL].
-
- UTC Universal Coordinated Time as maintained by the Bureau
- International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM).
-
- UTF-8
- An 8-bit transformation format of the Universal Character Set
- [UTF8]. Note that an incompatible change was made to the coded
- character set referenced by [UTF8], so for the purpose of this
- document, UTF-8 refers to the UTF-8 encoding as defined by
- version 2.0 of Unicode [UNICODE-2], or ISO 10646 [ISO-10646]
- including amendments one through seven.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 3]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 1.6. ACAP Command Overview
-
- The AUTHENTICATE, NOOP, LANG and LOGOUT commands provide basic
- protocol services. The SEARCH command is used to select, sort, fetch
- and monitor changes to attribute values and metadata. The
- UPDATECONTEXT and FREECONTEXT commands are also used to assist in
- monitoring changes in attribute values and metadata. The STORE
- command is used to add, modify and delete entries and attributes.
- The DELETEDSINCE command is used to assist a client in
- re-synchronizing a cache with the server. The GETQUOTA, SETACL,
- DELETEACL, LISTRIGHTS and MYRIGHTS commands are used to examine
- storage quotas and examine or modify access permissions.
-
- 2. Protocol Framework
-
- 2.1. Link Level
-
- The ACAP protocol assumes a reliable data stream such as provided by
- TCP. When TCP is used, an ACAP server listens on port 674.
-
- 2.2. Commands and Responses
-
- An ACAP session consists of the establishment of a client/server
- connection, an initial greeting from the server, and client/server
- interactions. These client/server interactions consist of a client
- command, server data, and a server completion result.
-
- ACAP is a text-based line-oriented protocol. In general,
- interactions transmitted by clients and servers are in the form of
- lines; that is, sequences of characters that end with a CRLF. The
- protocol receiver of an ACAP client or server is either reading a
- line, or is reading a sequence of octets with a known count (a
- literal) followed by a line. Both clients and servers must be
- capable of handling lines of arbitrary length.
-
- 2.2.1. Client Protocol Sender and Server Protocol Receiver
-
- The client command begins an operation. Each client command is
- prefixed with a identifier (an alphanumeric string of no more than 32
- characters, e.g., A0001, A0002, etc.) called a "tag". A different
- tag SHOULD be generated by the client for each command.
-
- There are two cases in which a line from the client does not
- represent a complete command. In one case, a command argument is
- quoted with an octet count (see the description of literal in section
- 2.6.3); in the other case, the command arguments require server
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 4]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- feedback (see the AUTHENTICATE command). In some of these cases, the
- server sends a command continuation request if it is ready for the
- next part of the command. This response is prefixed with the token
- "+".
-
- Note: If, instead, the server detected an error in a
- command, it sends a BAD completion response with tag
- matching the command (as described below) to reject the
- command and prevent the client from sending any more of the
- command.
-
- It is also possible for the server to send a completion or
- intermediate response for some other command (if multiple
- commands are in progress), or untagged data. In either
- case, the command continuation request is still pending;
- the client takes the appropriate action for the response,
- and reads another response from the server.
-
- The ACAP server reads a command line from the client, parses the
- command and its arguments, and transmits server data and a server
- command completion result.
-
- 2.2.2. Server Protocol Sender and Client Protocol Receiver
-
- Data transmitted by the server to the client come in four forms:
- command continuation requests, command completion results,
- intermediate responses, and untagged responses.
-
- A command continuation request is prefixed with the token "+".
-
- A command completion result indicates the success or failure of the
- operation. It is tagged with the same tag as the client command
- which began the operation. Thus, if more than one command is in
- progress, the tag in a server completion response identifies the
- command to which the response applies. There are three possible
- server completion responses: OK (indicating success), NO (indicating
- failure), or BAD (indicating protocol error such as unrecognized
- command or command syntax error).
-
- An intermediate response returns data which can only be interpreted
- within the context of a command in progress. It is tagged with the
- same tag as the client command which began the operation. Thus, if
- more than one command is in progress, the tag in an intermediate
- response identifies the command to which the response applies. A
- tagged response other than "OK", "NO", or "BAD" is an intermediate
- response.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 5]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- An untagged response returns data or status messages which may be
- interpreted outside the context of a command in progress. It is
- prefixed with the token "*". Untagged data may be sent as a result
- of a client command, or may be sent unilaterally by the server.
- There is no syntactic difference between untagged data that resulted
- from a specific command and untagged data that were sent
- unilaterally.
-
- The protocol receiver of an ACAP client reads a response line from
- the server. It then takes action on the response based upon the
- first token of the response, which may be a tag, a "*", or a "+" as
- described above.
-
- A client MUST be prepared to accept any server response at all times.
- This includes untagged data that it may not have requested.
-
- This topic is discussed in greater detail in the Server Responses
- section.
-
- 2.3. Server States
-
- An ACAP server is in one of three states. Most commands are valid in
- only certain states. It is a protocol error for the client to
- attempt a command while the server is in an inappropriate state for
- that command. In this case, a server will respond with a BAD command
- completion result.
-
- 2.3.1. Non-Authenticated State
-
- In non-authenticated state, the user must supply authentication
- credentials before most commands will be permitted. This state is
- entered when a connection starts.
-
- 2.3.2. Authenticated State
-
- In authenticated state, the user is authenticated and most commands
- will be permitted. This state is entered when acceptable
- authentication credentials have been provided.
-
- 2.3.3. Logout State
-
- In logout state, the session is being terminated, and the server will
- close the connection. This state can be entered as a result of a
- client request or by unilateral server decision.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 6]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- +--------------------------------------+
- |initial connection and server greeting|
- +--------------------------------------+
- || (1) || (2)
- VV ||
- +-----------------+ ||
- |non-authenticated| ||
- +-----------------+ ||
- || (4) || (3) ||
- || VV ||
- || +----------------+ ||
- || | authenticated | ||
- || +----------------+ ||
- || || (4) ||
- VV VV VV
- +--------------------------------------+
- | logout and close connection |
- +--------------------------------------+
-
- (1) connection (ACAP greeting)
- (2) rejected connection (BYE greeting)
- (3) successful AUTHENTICATE command
- (4) LOGOUT command, server shutdown, or connection closed
-
- 2.4. Operational Considerations
-
- 2.4.1. Untagged Status Updates
-
- At any time, a server can send data that the client did not request.
-
- 2.4.2. Response when No Command in Progress
-
- Server implementations are permitted to send an untagged response
- while there is no command in progress. Server implementations that
- send such responses MUST deal with flow control considerations.
- Specifically, they must either (1) verify that the size of the data
- does not exceed the underlying transport's available window size, or
- (2) use non-blocking writes.
-
- 2.4.3. Auto-logout Timer
-
- If a server has an inactivity auto-logout timer, that timer MUST be
- of at least 30 minutes duration. The receipt of ANY command from the
- client during that interval MUST suffice to reset the auto-logout
- timer.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 7]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 2.4.4. Multiple Commands in Progress
-
- The client is not required to wait for the completion result of a
- command before sending another command, subject to flow control
- constraints on the underlying data stream. Similarly, a server is
- not required to process a command to completion before beginning
- processing of the next command, unless an ambiguity would result
- because of a command that would affect the results of other commands.
- If there is such an ambiguity, the server executes commands to
- completion in the order given by the client.
-
- 2.5. Server Command Continuation Request
-
- The command continuation request is indicated by a "+" token instead
- of a tag. This indicates that the server is ready to accept the
- continuation of a command from the client.
-
- This response is used in the AUTHENTICATE command to transmit server
- data to the client, and request additional client data. This
- response is also used if an argument to any command is a
- synchronizing literal (see section 2.6.3).
-
- The client is not permitted to send the octets of a synchronizing
- literal unless the server indicates that it expects it. This permits
- the server to process commands and reject errors on a line-by-line
- basis, assuming it checks for non-synchronizing literals at the end
- of each line. The remainder of the command, including the CRLF that
- terminates a command, follows the octets of the literal. If there
- are any additional command arguments the literal octets are followed
- by a space and those arguments.
-
- Example: C: A099 FREECONTEXT {10}
- S: + "Ready for additional command text"
- C: FRED
- C: FOOB
- S: A099 OK "FREECONTEXT completed"
- C: A044 BLURDYBLOOP {102856}
- S: A044 BAD "No such command as 'BLURDYBLOOP'"
-
-
- 2.6. Data Formats
-
- ACAP uses textual commands and responses. Data in ACAP can be in one
- of five forms: atom, number, string, parenthesized list or NIL.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 8]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 2.6.1. Atom
-
- An atom consists of one to 1024 non-special characters. It must
- begin with a letter. Atoms are used for protocol keywords.
-
- 2.6.2. Number
-
- A number consists of one or more digit characters, and represents a
- numeric value. Numbers are restricted to the range of an unsigned
- 32-bit integer: 0 < number < 4,294,967,296.
-
- 2.6.3. String
-
- A string is in one of two forms: literal and quoted string. The
- literal form is the general form of string. The quoted string form
- is an alternative that avoids the overhead of processing a literal at
- the cost of restrictions of what may be in a quoted string.
-
- A literal is a sequence of zero or more octets (including CR and LF),
- prefix-quoted with an octet count in the form of an open brace ("{"),
- the number of octets, close brace ("}"), and CRLF. In the case of
- literals transmitted from server to client, the CRLF is immediately
- followed by the octet data.
-
- There are two forms of literals transmitted from client to server.
- The form where the open brace ("{") and number of octets is
- immediately followed by a close brace ("}") and CRLF is called a
- synchronizing literal. When sending a synchronizing literal, the
- client must wait to receive a command continuation request before
- sending the octet data (and the remainder of the command). The other
- form of literal, the non-synchronizing literal, is used to transmit a
- string from client to server without waiting for a command
- continuation request. The non-synchronizing literal differs from the
- synchronizing literal by having a plus ("+") between the number of
- octets and the close brace ("}") and by having the octet data
- immediately following the CRLF.
-
- A quoted string is a sequence of zero to 1024 octets excluding NUL,
- CR and LF, with double quote (<">) characters at each end.
-
- The empty string is represented as "" (a quoted string with zero
- characters between double quotes), as {0} followed by CRLF (a
- synchronizing literal with an octet count of 0), or as {0+} followed
- by a CRLF (a non-synchronizing literal with an octet count of 0).
-
- Note: Even if the octet count is 0, a client transmitting a
- synchronizing literal must wait to receive a command
- continuation request.
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 9]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 2.6.3.1. 8-bit and Binary Strings
-
- Most strings in ACAP are restricted to UTF-8 characters and may not
- contain NUL octets. Attribute values MAY contain any octets
- including NUL.
-
- 2.6.4. Parenthesized List
-
- Data structures are represented as a "parenthesized list"; a sequence
- of data items, delimited by space, and bounded at each end by
- parentheses. A parenthesized list can contain other parenthesized
- lists, using multiple levels of parentheses to indicate nesting.
-
- The empty list is represented as () -- a parenthesized list with no
- members.
-
- 2.6.5. NIL
-
- The special atom "NIL" represents the non-existence of a particular
- data item that is represented as a string or parenthesized list, as
- distinct from the empty string "" or the empty parenthesized list ().
-
- 3. Protocol Elements
-
- This section defines data formats and other protocol elements used
- throughout the ACAP protocol.
-
- 3.1. Entries and Attributes
-
- Within a dataset, each entry name is made up of zero or more UTF-8
- characters other than slash ("/"). A slash separated list of
- entries, one at each level of the hierarchy, forms the full path to
- an entry.
-
- Each entry is made up of a set of attributes. Each attribute has a
- hierarchical name in UTF-8, with each component of the name separated
- by a period (".").
-
- The value of an attribute is either single or multi-valued. A single
- value is NIL (has no value), or a string of zero or more octets. A
- multi-value is a list of zero or more strings, each of zero or more
- octets.
-
- Attribute names are not permitted to contain asterisk ("*") or
- percent ("%") and MUST be valid UTF-8 strings which do not contain
- NUL. Invalid attribute names result in a BAD response. Entry names
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 10]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- are not permitted to begin with "." or contain slash ("/") and MUST
- be valid UTF-8 strings which do not contain NUL. Invalid entry names
- in the entry field of a command result in a BAD response.
-
- Use of non-visible UTF-8 characters in attribute and entry names is
- discouraged.
-
- 3.1.1. Predefined Attributes
-
- Attribute names which do not contain a dot (".") are reserved for
- standardized attributes which have meaning in any dataset. The
- following attributes are defined by the ACAP protocol.
-
- entry
- Contains the name of the entry. MUST be single valued.
- Attempts to use illegal or multi-valued values for the entry
- attribute are protocol errors and MUST result in a BAD
- completion response. This is a special case.
-
- modtime
- Contains the date and time any read-write metadata in the entry
- was last modified. This value MUST be in UTC, MUST be
- automatically updated by the server.
-
- The value consists of 14 or more US-ASCII digits. The first
- four indicate the year, the next two indicate the month, the
- next two indicate the day of month, the next two indicate the
- hour (0 - 23), the next two indicate the minute, and the next
- two indicate the second. Any further digits indicate fractions
- of a second.
-
- The time, particularly fractions of a second, need not be
- accurate. It is REQUIRED, however, that any two entries in a
- dataset changed by successive modifications have strictly
- ascending modtime values. In addition, each STORE command
- within a dataset (including simultaneous stores from different
- connections) MUST use different modtime values.
-
- This attribute has enforced validation, so any attempt to STORE
- a value in this attribute MAY result in a NO response with an
- INVALID response code.
-
- subdataset
- If this attribute is set, it indicates the existence of a sub-
- dataset of this entry.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 11]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The value consists of a list of relative ACAP URLs (see section
- 3.2) which may be used to locate the sub-dataset. The base URL
- is the full path to the entry followed by a slash ("/"). The
- value "." indicates a subdataset is located directly under this
- one. Multiple values indicate replicated copies of the
- subdataset.
-
- For example, if the dataset "/folder/site/" has an entry
- "public-folder" with a subdataset attribute of ".", then there
- exists a dataset "/folder/site/public-folder/". If the value of
- the subdataset attribute was instead
- "//other.acap.domain//folder/site/public-folder/", that would
- indicate the dataset is actually located on a different ACAP
- server.
-
- A dataset can be created by storing a "subdataset" attribute
- including ".", and a sub-hierarchy of datasets is deleted by
- storing a NIL value to the "subdataset" attribute on the entry
- in the parent dataset.
-
- This attribute has enforced syntax validation. Specifically, if
- an attempt is made to STORE a non-list value (other than NIL),
- an empty list, or one of the values does not follow the URL
- syntax rules [BASIC-URL, REL-URL], then this will result in a NO
- response with an INVALID response code.
-
- 3.1.2. Attribute Metadata
-
- Each attribute is made up of metadata items which describe that
- attribute, its value and any associated access controls. Metadata
- items may be either read-only, in which case the client is never
- permitted to modify the item, or read-write, in which case the client
- may modify the item if the access control list (ACL) permits.
-
- The following metadata items are defined in this specification:
-
- acl The access control list for the attribute, if one exists. If
- the attribute does not have an ACL, NIL is returned.
- Read-write. See section 3.5 for the contents of an ACL.
-
- attribute
- The attribute name. Read-only.
-
- myrights
- The set of rights that the client has to the attribute.
- Read-only. See section 3.5 for the possible rights.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 12]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- size This is the length of the value. In the case of a
- multi-value, this is a list of lengths for each of the values.
- Read-only.
-
- value The value. For a multi-value, this is a list of single
- values. Read-write.
-
- Additional items of metadata may be defined in extensions to this
- protocol. Servers MUST respond to unrecognized metadata by returning
- a BAD command completion result.
-
- 3.2. ACAP URL scheme
-
- ACAP URLs are used within the ACAP protocol for the "subdataset"
- attribute, referrals and inheritance. They provide a convenient
- syntax for referring to other ACAP datasets. The ACAP URL follows
- the common Internet scheme syntax as defined in [BASIC-URL] except
- that plaintext passwords are not permitted. If :<port> is omitted,
- the port defaults to 674.
-
- An ACAP URL has the following general form:
-
- url-acap = "acap://" url-server "/" url-enc-entry [url-filter]
- [url-extension]
-
- The <url-server> element includes the hostname, and optional user
- name, authentication mechanism and port number. The <url-enc-entry>
- element contains the name of an entry path encoded according to the
- rules in [BASIC-URL].
-
- The <url-filter> element is an optional list of interesting attribute
- names. If omitted, the URL refers to all attributes of the named
- entry. The <url-extension> element is reserved for extensions to
- this URL scheme.
-
- Note that unsafe or reserved characters such as " " or "?" MUST be
- hex encoded as described in the URL specification [BASIC-URL]. Hex
- encoded octets are interpreted according to UTF-8 [UTF8].
-
- 3.2.1. ACAP URL User Name and Authentication Mechanism
-
- A user name and/or authentication mechanism may be supplied. They
- are used in the "AUTHENTICATE" command after making the connection to
- the ACAP server. If no user name or authentication mechanism is
- supplied, then the SASL ANONYMOUS [SASL-ANON] mechanism is used by
- default. If an authentication mechanism is supplied without a user
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 13]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- name, then one SHOULD be obtained from the specified mechanism or
- requested from the user as appropriate. If a user name is supplied
- without an authentication mechanism then ";AUTH=*" is assumed.
-
- The ";AUTH=" authentication parameter is interpreted as described in
- the IMAP URL Scheme [IMAP-URL].
-
- Note that if unsafe or reserved characters such as " " or ";" are
- present in the user name or authentication mechanism, they MUST be
- encoded as described in the URL specification [BASIC-URL].
-
- 3.2.2. Relative ACAP URLs
-
- Because ACAP uses "/" as the hierarchy separator for dataset paths,
- it works well with the relative URL rules defined in the relative URL
- specification [REL-URL].
-
- The <aauth> grammar element is considered part of the user name for
- purposes of resolving relative ACAP URLs.
-
- The base URL for a relative URL stored in an attribute's value is
- formed by taking the path to the dataset containing that attribute,
- appending a "/" followed by the entry name of the entry containing
- that attribute followed by "/".
-
- 3.3. Contexts
-
- A context is subset of entries in a dataset or datasets, created by a
- SEARCH command with a MAKECONTEXT modifier. Context names are
- client-generated strings and must not start with the slash ('/')
- character.
-
- When a client creates a context, it may request automatic
- notification of changes. A client may also request enumeration of
- entries within a context. Enumeration simplifies the implementation
- of a "virtual scrollbar" by the client.
-
- A context exists only within the ACAP session in which it was
- created. When the connection is closed, all contexts associated with
- that connection are automatically discarded. A server is required to
- support at least 100 active contexts within a session. If the server
- supports a larger limit it must advertise it in a CONTEXTLIMIT
- capability.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 14]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 3.4. Comparators
-
- A comparator is a named function which takes two input values and can
- be used to perform one or more of four comparison operations:
- ordering, equality, prefix and substring matching.
-
- The ordering operation is used both for the SORT search modifier and
- the COMPARE and COMPARESTRICT search keys. Ordering comparators can
- determine the ordinal precedence of any two values. When used for
- ordering, a comparator's name can be prefixed with "+" or "-" to
- indicate that the ordering should be normal order or reversed order
- respectively. If no prefix is included, "+" is assumed.
-
- For the purpose of ordering, a comparator may designate certain
- values as having an undefined ordinal precedence. Such values always
- collate with equal value after all other values regardless of whether
- normal or reversed ordering is used. Unless the comparator
- definition specifies otherwise, multi-values and NIL values have an
- undefined ordinal precedence.
-
- The equality operation is used for the EQUAL search modifier, and
- simply determines if the two values are considered equal under the
- comparator function. When comparing a single value to a multi-value,
- the two are considered equal if any one of the multiple values is
- equal to the single value.
-
- The prefix match operation is used for the PREFIX search modifier,
- and simply determines if the search value is a prefix of the item
- being searched. In the case of prefix search on a multi-value, the
- match is successful if the value is a prefix of any one of the
- multiple values.
-
- The substring match operation is used for the SUBSTRING search
- modifier, and simply determines if search value is a substring of the
- item being searched. In the case of substring search on a multi-
- value, the match is successful if the value is a substring of any one
- of the multiple values.
-
- Rules for naming and registering comparators will be defined in a
- future specification. Servers MUST respond to unknown or improperly
- used comparators with a BAD command completion result.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 15]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The following comparators are defined by this standard and MUST be
- implemented:
-
- i;octet
- Operations: Ordering, Equality, Prefix match, Substring match
-
- For collation, the i;octet comparator interprets the value of
- an attribute as a series of unsigned octets with ordinal
- values from 0 to 255. When ordering two strings, each octet
- pair is compared in sequence until the octets are unequal or
- the end of the string is reached. When collating two strings
- where the shorter is a prefix of the longer, the shorter
- string is interpreted as having a smaller ordinal value. The
- "i;octet" or "+i;octet" forms collate smaller ordinal values
- earlier, and the "-i;octet" form collates larger ordinal
- values earlier.
-
- For the equality function, two strings are equal if they are
- the same length and contain the same octets in the same
- order. NIL is equal only to itself.
-
- For non-binary, non-nil single values, i;octet ordering is
- equivalent to the ANSI C [ISO-C] strcmp() function applied to
- C string representations of the values. For non-binary,
- non-nil single values, i;octet substring match is equivalent
- to the ANSI C strstr() function applied to the C string
- representations of the values.
-
- i;ascii-casemap
- Operations: Ordering, Equality, Prefix match, Substring match
-
- The i;ascii-casemap comparator first applies a mapping to the
- attribute values which translates all US-ASCII letters to
- uppercase (octet values 0x61 to 0x7A are translated to octet
- values 0x41 to 0x5A respectively), then applies the i;octet
- comparator as described above. With this function the values
- "hello" and "HELLO" have the same ordinal value and are
- considered equal.
-
- i;ascii-numeric
- Operations: Ordering, Equality
-
- The i;ascii-numeric comparator interprets strings as decimal
- positive integers represented as US-ASCII digits. All values
- which do not begin with a US-ASCII digit are considered equal
- with an ordinal value higher than all non-NIL single-valued
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 16]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- attributes. Otherwise, all US-ASCII digits (octet values
- 0x30 to 0x39) are interpreted starting from the beginning of
- the string to the first non-digit or the end of the string.
-
-
- 3.5. Access Control Lists (ACLs)
-
- An access control list is a set of identifier, rights pairs used to
- restrict access to a given dataset, attribute or attribute within an
- entry. An ACL is represented by a multi-value with each value
- containing an identifier followed by a tab character followed by the
- rights. The syntax is defined by the "acl" rule in the formal syntax
- in section 8.
-
- Identifier is a UTF-8 string. The identifier "anyone" is reserved to
- refer to the universal identity (all authentications, including
- anonymous). All user name strings accepted by the AUTHENTICATE
- command to authenticate to the ACAP server are reserved as
- identifiers for the corresponding user. Identifiers starting with a
- slash ("/") character are reserved for authorization groups which
- will be defined in a future specification. Identifiers MAY be
- prefixed with a dash ("-") to indicate a revocation of rights. All
- other identifiers have implementation-defined meanings.
-
- Rights is a string listing a (possibly empty) set of alphanumeric
- characters, each character listing a set of operations which is being
- controlled. Letters are reserved for "standard" rights, listed
- below. The set of standard rights may only be extended by a
- standards-track or IESG approved experimental RFC. Digits are
- reserved for implementation or site defined rights. The currently
- defined standard rights are:
-
- x - search (use EQUAL search key with i;octet comparator)
- r - read (access with SEARCH command)
- w - write (modify with STORE command)
- i - insert (perform STORE on a previously NIL value)
- a - administer (perform SETACL or STORE on ACL attribute/metadata)
-
- An implementation may force rights to always or never be granted. In
- particular, implementations are expected to grant implicit read and
- administer rights to a user's personal dataset storage in order to
- avoid denial of service problems. Rights are never tied, unlike the
- IMAP ACL extension [IMAP-ACL].
-
- It is possible for multiple identifiers in an access control list to
- apply to a given user (or other authentication identity). For
- example, an ACL may include rights to be granted to the identifier
- matching the user, one or more implementation-defined identifiers
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 17]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- matching groups which include the user, and/or the identifier
- "anyone". These rights are combined by taking the union of all
- positive rights which apply to a given user and subtracting the union
- of all negative rights which apply to that user. A client MAY avoid
- this calculation by using the MYRIGHTS command and metadata items.
-
- Each attribute of each entry of a dataset may potentially have an
- ACL. If an attribute in an entry does not have an ACL, then access
- is controlled by a default ACL for that attribute in the dataset, if
- it exists. If there is no default ACL for that attribute in the
- dataset, access is controlled by a default ACL for that dataset. The
- default ACL for a dataset must exist.
-
- In order to perform any access or manipulation on an entry in a
- dataset, the client must have 'r' rights on the "entry" attribute of
- the entry. Implementations should take care not to reveal via error
- messages the existence of an entry for which the client does not have
- 'r' rights. A client does not need access to the "subdataset"
- attribute of the parent dataset in order to access the contents of a
- dataset.
-
- Many of the ACL commands and responses include an "acl object"
- parameter, for specifying what the ACL applies to. This is a
- parenthesized list. The list contains just the dataset name when
- referring to the default ACL for a dataset. The list contains a
- dataset name and an attribute name when referring to the default ACL
- for an attribute in a dataset. The list contains a dataset name, an
- attribute name, and an entry name when referring to the ACL for an
- attribute of an entry of a dataset.
-
-
- 3.6. Server Response Codes
-
- An OK, NO, BAD, ALERT or BYE response from the server MAY contain a
- response code to describe the event in a more detailed machine
- parsable fashion. A response code consists of data inside
- parentheses in the form of an atom, possibly followed by a space and
- arguments. Response codes are defined when there is a specific
- action that a client can take based upon the additional information.
- In order to support future extension, the response code is
- represented as a slash-separated hierarchy with each level of
- hierarchy representing increasing detail about the error. Clients
- MUST tolerate additional hierarchical response code detail which they
- don't understand.
-
- The currently defined response codes are:
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 18]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- AUTH-TOO-WEAK
- This response code is returned on a tagged NO result from an
- AUTHENTICATE command. It indicates that site security policy
- forbids the use of the requested mechanism for the specified
- authentication identity.
-
- ENCRYPT-NEEDED
- This response code is returned on a tagged NO result from an
- AUTHENTICATE command. It indicates that site security policy
- requires the use of a strong encryption mechanism for the
- specified authentication identity and mechanism.
-
- INVALID
- This response code indicates that a STORE command included
- data which the server implementation does not permit. It
- MUST NOT be used unless the dataset class specification for
- the attribute in question explicitly permits enforced server
- validation. The argument is the attribute which was invalid.
-
- MODIFIED
- This response code indicates that a conditional store failed
- because the modtime on the entry is later than the modtime
- specified with the STORE command UNCHANGEDSINCE modifier.
- The argument is the entry which had been modified.
-
- NOEXIST
- This response code indicates that a search or NOCREATE store
- failed because a specified dataset did not exist. The
- argument is the dataset which does not exist.
-
- PERMISSION
- A command failed due to insufficient permission based on the
- access control list or implicit rights. The argument is the
- acl-object which caused the permission failure.
-
- QUOTA
- A STORE or SETACL command which would have increased the size
- of the dataset failed due to insufficient quota.
-
- REFER
- This response code may be returned in a tagged NO response to
- any command that takes a dataset name as a parameter. It has
- one or more arguments with the syntax of relative URLs. It
- is a referral, indicating that the command should be retried
- using one of the relative URLs.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 19]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- SASL This response code can occur in the tagged OK response to a
- successful AUTHENTICATE command and includes the optional
- final server response data from the server as specified by
- SASL [SASL].
-
- TOOMANY
- This response code may be returned in a tagged OK response to
- a SEARCH command which includes the LIMIT modifier. The
- argument returns the total number of matching entries.
-
- TOOOLD
- The modtime specified in the DELETEDSINCE command is too old,
- so deletedsince information is no longer available.
-
- TRANSITION-NEEDED
- This response code occurs on a NO response to an AUTHENTICATE
- command. It indicates that the user name is valid, but the
- entry in the authentication database needs to be updated in
- order to permit authentication with the specified mechanism.
- This can happen if a user has an entry in a system
- authentication database such as Unix /etc/passwd, but does
- not have credentials suitable for use by the specified
- mechanism.
-
- TRYLATER
- A command failed due to a temporary server failure. The
- client MAY continue using local information and try the
- command later.
-
- TRYFREECONTEXT
- This response code may be returned in a tagged NO response to
- a SEARCH command which includes the MAKECONTEXT modifier. It
- indicates that a new context may not be created due to the
- server's limit on the number of existing contexts.
-
- WAYTOOMANY
- This response code may be returned in a tagged NO response to
- a SEARCH command which includes a HARDLIMIT search modifier.
- It indicates that the SEARCH would have returned more entries
- than the HARDLIMIT permitted.
-
- Additional response codes MUST be registered with IANA according
- to the proceedures in section 7.2. Client implementations MUST
- tolerate response codes that they do not recognize.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 20]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 4. Namespace Conventions
-
- 4.1. Dataset Namespace
-
- The dataset namespace is a slash-separated hierarchy. The first
- component of the dataset namespace is a dataset class. Dataset
- classes MUST have a vendor prefix (vendor.<vendor/product>) or be
- specified in a standards track or IESG approved experimental RFC.
- See section 7.3 for the registration template.
-
- The second component of the dataset name is "site", "group", "host",
- or "user" referring to server-wide data, administrative group data,
- per-host data and per-user data respectively.
-
- For "group", "host", and "user" areas, the third component of the
- path is the group name, the fully qualified host domain name, or the
- user name. A path of the form "/<dataset-class>/~/" is a convenient
- abbreviation for "/<dataset-class>/user/<current-user>/".
-
- Dataset names which begin with "/byowner/" are reserved as an
- alternate view of the namespace. This provides a way to see all the
- dataset classes which a particular owner uses. For example,
- "/byowner/~/<dataset-class>/" is an alternate name for
- "/<dataset-class>/~/". Byowner provides a way to view a list of
- dataset classes owned by a given user; this is done using the dataset
- "/byowner/user/<current-user>/" with the NOINHERIT SEARCH modifier.
-
- The dataset "/" may be used to find all dataset classes visible to
- the current user. A dataset of the form "/<dataset-class>/user/" may
- be used to find all users which have made a dataset or entry of that
- class visible to the current user.
-
- The formal syntax for a dataset name is defined by the "dataset-name"
- rule in section 4.3.
-
- 4.2. Attribute Namespace
-
- Attribute names which do not contain a dot (".") are reserved for
- standardized attributes which have meaning in any dataset. In order
- to simplify client implementations, the attribute namespace is
- intended to be unique across all datasets. To achieve this,
- attribute names are prefixed with the dataset class name followed by
- a dot ("."). Attributes which affect management of the dataset are
- prefixed with "dataset.". In addition, a subtree of the "vendor."
- attribute namespace may be registered with IANA according to the
- rules in section 7.4. ACAP implementors are encouraged to help
- define interoperable dataset classes specifications rather than using
- the private attribute namespace.
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 21]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- Some users or sites may wish to add their own private attributes to
- certain dataset classes. In order to enable this, the "user.<user-
- name>." and "site." subtrees of the attribute namespace are reserved
- for user-specific and site-specific attributes respectively and will
- not be standardized. Such attributes are not interoperable so are
- discouraged in favor of defining standard attributes. A future
- extension is expected to permit discovery of syntax for user or
- site-specific attributes. Clients wishing to support display of user
- or site-specific attributes should display the value of any non-NIL
- single-valued "user.<user-name>." or "site." attribute which has
- valid UTF-8 syntax.
-
- The formal syntax for an attribute name is defined by the
- "attribute-name" rule in the next section.
-
- 4.3. Formal Syntax for Dataset and Attribute Namespace
-
- The naming conventions for datasets and attributes are defined by the
- following ABNF. Note that this grammar is not part of the ACAP
- protocol syntax in section 8, as dataset names and attribute names
- are encoded as strings within the ACAP protocol.
-
- attribute-dacl = "dataset.acl" *("." name-component)
-
- attribute-dset = dataset-std 1*("." name-component)
- ;; MUST be defined in a dataset class specification
-
- attribute-name = attribute-std / attr-site / attr-user / vendor-name
-
- attribute-std = "entry" / "subdataset" / "modtime" /
- "dataset.inherit" / attribute-dacl / attribute-dset
-
- attr-site = "site" 1*("." name-component)
-
- attr-user = "user." name-component 1*("." name-component)
-
- byowner = "/byowner/" owner "/"
- [dataset-class "/" dataset-sub]
-
- dataset-class = dataset-std / vendor-name
-
- dataset-normal = "/" [dataset-class "/"
- (owner-prefix / dataset-tail)]
-
- dataset-name = byowner / dataset-normal
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 22]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- dataset-std = name-component
- ;; MUST be registered with IANA and the spec MUST
- ;; be published as a standards track or
- ;; IESG-approved experimental RFC
-
- dataset-sub = *(dname-component "/")
- ;; The rules for this portion of the namespace may
- ;; be further restricted by the dataset class
- ;; specification.
-
- dataset-tail = owner "/" dataset-sub
-
- dname-component = 1*UTF8-CHAR
- ;; MUST NOT begin with "." or contain "/"
-
- name-component = 1*UTF8-CHAR
- ;; MUST NOT contain ".", "/", "%", or "*"
-
- owner = "site" / owner-host / owner-group /
- owner-user / "~"
-
- owner-group = "group/" dname-component
-
- owner-host = "host/" dname-component
-
- owner-prefix = "group/" / "host/" / "user/"
-
- owner-user = "user/" dname-component
-
- vendor-name = vendor-token *("." name-component)
-
- vendor-token = "vendor." name-component
- ;; MUST be registered with IANA
-
- 5. Dataset Management
-
- The entry with an empty name ("") in the dataset is used to hold
- management information for the dataset as a whole.
-
- 5.1. Dataset Inheritance
-
- It is possible for one dataset to inherit data from another. The
- dataset from which the data is inherited is called the base dataset.
- Data in the base dataset appears in the inheriting dataset, except
- when overridden by a STORE to the inheriting dataset.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 23]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The base dataset is usually a system-wide or group-wide set of
- defaults. A system-wide dataset usually has one inheriting dataset
- per user, allowing each user to add to or modify the defaults as
- appropriate.
-
- An entry which exists in both the inheriting and base dataset
- inherits a modtime equal to the greater of the two modtimes. An
- attribute in such an entry is inherited from the base dataset if it
- was never modified by a STORE command in the inheriting dataset or if
- DEFAULT was stored to that attribute. This permits default entries
- to be amended rather than replaced in the inheriting dataset.
-
- The "subdataset" attribute is not directly inherited. If the base
- dataset includes a "subdataset" attribute and the inheriting dataset
- does not, then the "subdataset" attribute will inherit a virtual
- value of a list containing a ".". The subdataset at that node is
- said to be a "virtual" dataset as it is simply a virtual copy of the
- appropriate base dataset with all "subdataset" attributes changed to
- a list containing a ".". A virtual dataset is not visible if
- NOINHERIT is specified on the SEARCH command.
-
- Servers MUST support at least two levels of inheritance. This
- permits a user's dataset such as "/options/user/fred/common" to
- inherit from a group dataset such as "/options/group/dinosaur
- operators/common" which in turn inherits from a server-wide dataset
- such as "/options/site/common".
-
- 5.2. Dataset Attributes
-
- The following attributes apply to management of the dataset when
- stored in the "" entry of a dataset. These attributes are not
- inherited.
-
- dataset.acl
- This holds the default access control list for the dataset.
- This attribute is validated, so an invalid access control list
- in a STORE command will result in a NO response with an INVALID
- response code.
-
- dataset.acl.<attribute>
- This holds the default access control list for an attribute
- within the dataset. This attribute is validated, so an invalid
- access control list in a STORE command will result in a NO
- response with an INVALID response code.
-
- dataset.inherit
- This holds the name of a dataset from which to inherit according
- to the rules in the previous section. This attribute MAY refer
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 24]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- to a non-existent dataset, in which case nothing is inherited.
- This attribute is validated, so illegal dataset syntax or an
- attempt to store a multi-value will result in a NO response with
- an INVALID response code.
-
- 5.3. Dataset Creation
-
- When a dataset is first created (by storing a "." in the subdataset
- attribute or storing an entry in a previously non-existent dataset),
- the dataset attributes are initialized with the values from the
- parent dataset in the "/byowner/" hierarchy. In the case of the
- "dataset.inherit" attribute, the appropriate hierarchy component is
- added. For example, given the following entry (note that \t refers
- to the US-ASCII horizontal tab character):
-
- entry path "/byowner/user/joe/"
- dataset.acl ("joe\txrwia" "fred\txr")
- dataset.inherit "/byowner/site"
-
- If a new dataset class "/byowner/user/joe/new" is created, it will
- have the following dataset attributes:
-
- entry path "/byowner/user/joe/new/"
- dataset.acl ("joe\txrwia" "fred\txr")
- dataset.inherit "/byowner/site/new"
-
- Note that the dataset "/byowner/user/joe/new/" is equivalent to
- "/new/user/joe/".
-
- 5.4. Dataset Class Capabilities
-
- Certain dataset classes or dataset class features may only be useful
- if there is an active updating client or integrated server support
- for the feature. The dataset class "capability" is reserved to allow
- clients or servers to advertise such features. The "entry" attribute
- within this dataset class is the name of the dataset class whose
- features are being described. The attributes are prefixed with
- "capability.<dataset-class>." and are defined by the appropriate
- dataset class specification.
-
- Since it is possible for an unprivileged user to run an active client
- for himself, a per-user capability dataset is useful. The dataset
- "/capability/~/" holds information about all features available to
- the user (via inheritance), and the dataset "/capability/site/" holds
- information about all features supported by the site.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 25]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 5.5. Dataset Quotas
-
- Management and scope of quotas is implementation dependent. Clients
- can check the applicable quota limit and usage (in bytes) with the
- GETQUOTA command. Servers can notify the client of a low quota
- situation with the QUOTA untagged response.
-
- 6. Command and Response Specifications
-
- ACAP commands and responses are described in this section. Commands
- are organized first by the state in which the command is permitted,
- then by a general category of command type.
-
- Command arguments, identified by "Arguments:" in the command
- descriptions below, are described by function, not by syntax. The
- precise syntax of command arguments is described in the Formal Syntax
- section.
-
- Some commands cause specific server data to be returned; these are
- identified by "Data:" in the command descriptions below. See the
- response descriptions in the Responses section for information on
- these responses, and the Formal Syntax section for the precise syntax
- of these responses. It is possible for server data to be transmitted
- as a result of any command; thus, commands that do not specifically
- require server data specify "no specific data for this command"
- instead of "none".
-
- The "Result:" in the command description refers to the possible
- tagged status responses to a command, and any special interpretation
- of these status responses.
-
- 6.1. Initial Connection
-
- Upon session startup, the server sends one of two untagged responses:
- ACAP or BYE. The untagged BYE response is described in section
- 6.2.8.
-
- 6.1.1. ACAP Untagged Response
-
- Data: capability list
-
- The untagged ACAP response indicates the session is ready to
- accept commands and contains a space-separated listing of
- capabilities that the server supports. Each capability is
- represented by a list containing the capability name optionally
- followed by capability specific string arguments.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 26]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- ACAP capability names MUST be registered with IANA according to
- the rules in section 7.1.
-
- Client implementations SHOULD NOT require any capability name
- beyond those defined in this specification, and MUST tolerate any
- unknown capability names. A client implementation MAY be
- configurable to require SASL mechanisms other than CRAM-MD5
- [CRAM-MD5] for site security policy reasons.
-
- The following initial capabilities are defined:
-
- CONTEXTLIMIT
- The CONTEXTLIMIT capability has one argument which is a
- number describing the maximum number of contexts the server
- supports per connection. The number 0 indicates the server
- has no limit, otherwise this number MUST be greater than
- 100.
-
- IMPLEMENTATION
- The IMPLEMENTATION capability has one argument which is a
- string describing the server implementation. ACAP clients
- MUST NOT alter their behavior based on this value. It is
- intended primarily for debugging purposes.
-
- SASL The SASL capability includes a list of the authentication
- mechanisms supported by the server. See section 6.3.1.
-
-
- Example: S: * ACAP (IMPLEMENTATION "ACME v3.5")
- (SASL "CRAM-MD5") (CONTEXTLIMIT "200")
-
- 6.2. Any State
-
- The following commands and responses are valid in any state.
-
- 6.2.1. NOOP Command
-
- Arguments: none
-
- Data: no specific data for this command (but see below)
-
- Result: OK - noop completed
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The NOOP command always succeeds. It does nothing. It can be
- used to reset any inactivity auto-logout timer on the server.
-
- Example: C: a002 NOOP
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 27]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- S: a002 OK "NOOP completed"
-
-
- 6.2.2. LANG Command
-
- Arguments: list of language preferences
-
- Data: intermediate response: LANG
-
- Result: OK - lang completed
- NO - no matching language available
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- One or more arguments are supplied to indicate the client's
- preferred languages [LANG-TAGS] for error messages. The server
- will match each client preference in order against its internal
- table of available error string languages. For a client
- preference to match a server language, the client's language tag
- MUST be a prefix of the server's tag and match up to a "-" or the
- end of string. If a match is found, the server returns an
- intermediate LANG response and an OK response. The LANG response
- indicates the actual language selected and appropriate comparators
- for use with the languages listed in the LANG command.
-
- If no LANG command is issued, all error text strings MUST be in
- the registered language "i-default" [CHARSET-LANG-POLICY],
- intended for an international audience.
-
- Example: C: A003 LANG "fr-ca" "fr" "en-ca" "en-uk"
- S: A003 LANG "fr-ca" "i;octet" "i;ascii-numeric"
- "i;ascii-casemap" "en;primary" "fr;primary"
- S: A003 OK "Bonjour"
-
-
- 6.2.3. LANG Intermediate Response
-
- Data: language for error responses
- appropriate comparators
-
- The LANG response indicates the language which will be used for
- error responses and the comparators which are appropriate for the
- languages listed in the LANG command. The comparators SHOULD be
- in approximate order from most efficient (usually "i;octet") to
- most appropriate for human text in the preferred language.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 28]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 6.2.4. LOGOUT Command
-
- Arguments: none
-
- Data: mandatory untagged response: BYE
-
- Result: OK - logout completed
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The LOGOUT command informs the server that the client is done with
- the session. The server must send a BYE untagged response before
- the (tagged) OK response, and then close the network connection.
-
- Example: C: A023 LOGOUT
- S: * BYE "ACAP Server logging out"
- S: A023 OK "LOGOUT completed"
- (Server and client then close the connection)
-
-
- 6.2.5. OK Response
-
- Data: optional response code
- human-readable text
-
- The OK response indicates an information message from the server.
- When tagged, it indicates successful completion of the associated
- command. The human-readable text may be presented to the user as
- an information message. The untagged form indicates an
- information-only message; the nature of the information MAY be
- indicated by a response code.
-
- Example: S: * OK "Master ACAP server is back up"
-
-
- 6.2.6. NO Response
-
- Data: optional response code
- human-readable text
-
- The NO response indicates an operational error message from the
- server. When tagged, it indicates unsuccessful completion of the
- associated command. The untagged form indicates a warning; the
- command may still complete successfully. The human-readable text
- describes the condition.
-
- Example: C: A010 SEARCH "/addressbook/" DEPTH 3 RETURN ("*")
- EQUAL "entry" "+i;octet" "bozo"
- S: * NO "Master ACAP server is down, your data may
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 29]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- be out of date."
- S: A010 OK "search done"
- ...
- C: A222 STORE ("/folder/site/comp.mail.misc"
- "folder.creation-time" "19951206103412")
- S: A222 NO (PERMISSION ("/folder/site/")) "Permission
- denied"
-
-
- 6.2.7. BAD Response
-
- Data: optional response code
- human-readable text
-
- The BAD response indicates an error message from the server. When
- tagged, it reports a protocol-level error in the client's command;
- the tag indicates the command that caused the error. The untagged
- form indicates a protocol-level error for which the associated
- command can not be determined; it may also indicate an internal
- server failure. The human-readable text describes the condition.
-
- Example: C: ...empty line...
- S: * BAD "Empty command line"
- C: A443 BLURDYBLOOP
- S: A443 BAD "Unknown command"
- C: A444 NOOP Hello
- S: A444 BAD "invalid arguments"
-
-
- 6.2.8. BYE Untagged Response
-
- Data: optional response code
- human-readable text
-
- The untagged BYE response indicates that the server is about to
- close the connection. The human-readable text may be displayed to
- the user in a status report by the client. The BYE response may
- be sent as part of a normal logout sequence, or as a panic
- shutdown announcement by the server. It is also used by some
- server implementations as an announcement of an inactivity auto-
- logout.
-
- This response is also used as one of two possible greetings at
- session startup. It indicates that the server is not willing to
- accept a session from this client.
-
- Example: S: * BYE "Auto-logout; idle for too long"
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 30]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 6.2.9. ALERT Untagged Response
-
- Data: optional response code
- human-readable text
-
- The human-readable text contains a special human generated alert
- message that MUST be presented to the user in a fashion that calls
- the user's attention to the message. This is intended to be used
- for vital messages from the server administrator to the user, such
- as a warning that the server will soon be shut down for
- maintenance.
-
- Example: S: * ALERT "This ACAP server will be shut down in
- 10 minutes for system maintenance."
-
-
- 6.3. Non-Authenticated State
-
- In non-authenticated state, the AUTHENTICATE command establishes
- authentication and enters authenticated state. The AUTHENTICATE
- command provides a general mechanism for a variety of authentication
- techniques.
-
- Server implementations may allow non-authenticated access to certain
- information by supporting the SASL ANONYMOUS [SASL-ANON] mechanism.
-
- Once authenticated (including as anonymous), it is not possible to
- re-enter non-authenticated state.
-
- Only the any-state commands (NOOP, LANG and LOGOUT) and the
- AUTHENTICATE command are valid in non-authenticated state.
-
-
- 6.3.1. AUTHENTICATE Command
-
- Arguments: SASL mechanism name
- optional initial response
-
- Data: continuation data may be requested
-
- Result: OK - authenticate completed, now in authenticated state
- NO - authenticate failure: unsupported authentication
- mechanism, credentials rejected
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid,
- authentication exchange cancelled
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 31]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The AUTHENTICATE command indicates a SASL [SASL] authentication
- mechanism to the server. If the server supports the requested
- authentication mechanism, it performs an authentication protocol
- exchange to authenticate and identify the user. Optionally, it
- also negotiates a security layer for subsequent protocol
- interactions. If the requested authentication mechanism is not
- supported, the server rejects the AUTHENTICATE command by sending
- a tagged NO response.
-
- The authentication protocol exchange consists of a series of
- server challenges and client answers that are specific to the
- authentication mechanism. A server challenge consists of a
- command continuation request with the "+" token followed by a
- string. The client answer consists of a line consisting of a
- string. If the client wishes to cancel an authentication
- exchange, it should issue a line with a single unquoted "*". If
- the server receives such an answer, it must reject the
- AUTHENTICATE command by sending a tagged BAD response.
-
- The optional initial-response argument to the AUTHENTICATE command
- is used to save a round trip when using authentication mechanisms
- that are defined to send no data in the initial challenge. When
- the initial-response argument is used with such a mechanism, the
- initial empty challenge is not sent to the client and the server
- uses the data in the initial-response argument as if it were sent
- in response to the empty challenge. If the initial-response
- argument to the AUTHENTICATE command is used with a mechanism that
- sends data in the initial challenge, the server rejects the
- AUTHENTICATE command by sending a tagged NO response.
-
- The service name specified by this protocol's profile of SASL is
- "acap".
-
- If a security layer is negotiated through the SASL authentication
- exchange, it takes effect immediately following the CRLF that
- concludes the authentication exchange for the client, and the CRLF
- of the tagged OK response for the server.
-
- All ACAP implementations MUST implement the CRAM-MD5 SASL
- mechanism [CRAM-MD5], although they MAY offer a configuration
- option to disable it if site security policy dictates. The
- example below is the same example described in the CRAM-MD5
- specification.
-
- If an AUTHENTICATE command fails with a NO response, the client
- may try another authentication mechanism by issuing another
- AUTHENTICATE command. In other words, the client may request
- authentication types in decreasing order of preference.
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 32]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- Example: S: * ACAP (IMPLEMENTATION "Blorfysoft v3.5")
- (SASL "CRAM-MD5" "KERBEROS_V4")
- C: A001 AUTHENTICATE "CRAM-MD5"
- S: + "<1896.697170952@postoffice.reston.mci.net>"
- C: "tim b913a602c7eda7a495b4e6e7334d3890"
- S: A001 OK "CRAM-MD5 authentication successful"
-
-
- 6.4. Searching
-
- This section describes the SEARCH command, for retrieving data from
- datasets.
-
-
- 6.4.1. SEARCH Command
-
- Arguments: dataset or context name
- optional list of modifiers
- search criteria
-
- Data: intermediate responses: ENTRY, MODTIME, REFER
- untagged responses: ADDTO, REMOVEFROM, CHANGE, MODTIME
-
- Result: OK - search completed
- NO - search failure: can't perform search
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The SEARCH command identifies a subset of entries in a dataset and
- returns information on that subset to the client. Inherited
- entries and attributes are included in the search unless the
- NOINHERIT search modifier is included or the user does not have
- permission to read the attributes in the base dataset.
-
- The first argument to SEARCH identifies what is to be searched.
- If the string begins with a slash ("/"), it is the name of a
- dataset to be searched, otherwise it is a name of a context that
- was created by a SEARCH command given previously in the session.
-
- A successful SEARCH command MAY result in intermediate ENTRY
- responses and MUST result in a MODTIME intermediate response.
-
- Following that are zero or more modifiers to the search. Each
- modifier may be specified at most once. The defined modifiers
- are:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 33]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- DEPTH number
- The SEARCH command will traverse the dataset tree up to the
- specified depth. ENTRY responses will include the full path
- to the entry. A value of "0" indicates that the search
- should traverse the entire tree. A value of "1" is the
- default and indicates only the specified dataset should be
- searched. If a dataset is traversed which is not located on
- the current server, then a REFER intermediate response is
- returned for that subtree and the search continues.
-
- HARDLIMIT number
- If the SEARCH command would result in more than number
- entries, the SEARCH fails with a NO completion result with a
- WAYTOOMANY response code.
-
- LIMIT number number
- Limits the number of intermediate ENTRY responses that the
- search may generate. The first numeric argument specifies
- the limit, the second number specifies the number of entries
- to return if the number of matches exceeds the limit. If the
- limit is exceeded, the SEARCH command still succeeds,
- returning the total number of matches in a TOOMANY response
- code in the tagged OK response.
-
- MAKECONTEXT [ENUMERATE] [NOTIFY] context
- Causes the SEARCH command to create a context with the name
- given in the argument to refer to the matching entries. If
- the SEARCH is successful, the context name may then be given
- as an argument to subsequent SEARCH commands to search the
- set of matching entries. If a context with the specified
- name already exists, it is first freed. If a new context may
- not be created due to the server's limit on the number of
- existing contexts, the command fails, returning a
- TRYFREECONTEXT response code in the NO completion response.
-
- The optional "ENUMERATE" and "NOTIFY" arguments may be
- included to request enumeration of the context (for virtual
- scroll bars) or change notifications for the context. If
- "NOTIFY" is not requested, the context represents a snapshot
- of the entries at the time the SEARCH was issued.
-
- ENUMERATE requests that the contents of the context be
- ordered according to the SORT modifier and that sequential
- numbers, starting with one, be assigned to the entries in the
- context. This permits the RANGE modifier to be used to fetch
- portions of the ordered context.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 34]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- NOTIFY requests that the server send untagged ADDTO,
- REMOVEFROM, CHANGE, and MODTIME responses while the context
- created by this SEARCH command exists. The server MAY issue
- untagged ADDTO, REMOVEFROM, CHANGE and MODTIME notifications
- for a context at any time between the issuing of the SEARCH
- command with MAKECONTEXT NOTIFY and the completion of a
- FREECONTEXT command for the context. Notifications are only
- issued for changes which occur after the server receives the
- SEARCH command which created the context. After issuing a
- sequence of ADDTO, REMOVEFROM or CHANGE notifications, the
- server MUST issue an untagged MODTIME notification indicating
- that the client has all updates to the entries in the context
- up to and including the given modtime value. Servers are
- permitted a reasonable delay to batch change notifications
- before sending them to the client.
-
- The position arguments of the ADDTO, REMOVEFROM and CHANGE
- notifications are 0 if ENUMERATE is not requested.
-
- NOINHERIT
- This causes the SEARCH command to operate without
- inheritance. It can be used to tell which values are
- explicit overrides. If MAKECONTEXT is also specified, the
- created context is also not affected by inheritance.
-
- RETURN (metadata...)
- Specifies what is to be returned in intermediate ENTRY
- responses. If this modifier is not specified, no
- intermediate ENTRY responses are returned.
-
- Inside the parentheses is an optional list of attributes,
- each optionally followed by a parenthesized list of metadata.
- If the parenthesized list of metadata is not specified, it
- defaults to "(value)".
-
- An attribute name with a trailing "*" requests all attributes
- with that prefix. A "*" by itself requests all attributes.
- If the parenthesized list of metadata is not specified for an
- attribute with a trailing "*", it defaults to "(attribute
- value)". Results matching such an attribute pattern are
- grouped in parentheses.
-
- Following the last intermediate ENTRY response, the server
- returns a single intermediate MODTIME response.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 35]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- SORT (attribute comparator ...)
- Specifies the order in which any resulting ENTRY replies are
- to be returned to the client. The SORT modifier takes as an
- argument a parenthesized list of one or more
- attribute/comparator pairs. Attribute lists the attribute to
- sort on, comparator specifies the name of the collation rule
- to apply to the values of the attribute. Successive
- attribute/comparator pairs are used to order two entries only
- when all preceding pairs indicate the two entries collate the
- same.
-
- If the SORT modifier is used in conjunction with the
- MAKECONTEXT modifier, the SORT modifier specifies the
- ordering of entries in the created context.
-
- If no SORT modifier is specified, or none of the
- attribute/comparator pairs indicates an order for the two
- entries, the server uses the order of the entries that exists
- in the context or dataset being searched.
-
-
- Following the modifiers is the search criteria. Searching
- criteria consist of one or more search keys. Search keys may be
- combined using the AND, and OR search keys. For example, the
- criteria (the newline is for readability and not part of the
- criteria):
- AND COMPARE "modtime" "+i;octet" "19951206103400"
- COMPARE "modtime" "-i;octet" "19960112000000"
- refers to all entries modified between 10:34 December 6 1995 and
- midnight January 12, 1996 UTC.
-
- The currently defined search keys are as follows.
-
- ALL This matches all entries.
-
- AND search-key1 search-key2
- Entries that match both search keys.
-
- COMPARE attribute comparator value
- Entries for which the value of the specified attribute
- collates using the specified comparator the same or later
- than the specified value.
-
- COMPARESTRICT attribute comparator value
- Entries for which the specified attribute collates using the
- specified comparator later than the specified value.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 36]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- EQUAL attribute comparator value
- Entries for which the value of the attribute is equal to the
- specified value using the specified comparator.
-
- NOT search-key
- Entries that do not match the specified search key.
-
- OR search-key1 search-key2
- Entries that match either search key.
-
- PREFIX attribute comparator value
- Entries which begin with the specified value using the
- specified comparator. If the specified comparator doesn't
- support substring matching, a BAD response is returned.
-
- RANGE start end time
- Entries which are within the specified range of the
- enumerated context's ordering. The lowest-ordered entry in
- the context is assigned number one, the next lowest entry is
- assigned number two, and so on. The numeric arguments
- specify the lowest and highest numbers to match. The time
- specifies that the client has processed notifications for the
- context up to the specified time. If the context has been
- modified since then, the server MUST either return a NO with
- a MODIFIED response code, or return the results that the
- SEARCH would have returned if none of the changes since that
- time had been made.
-
- RANGE is only permitted on enumerated contexts. If RANGE is
- used with a dataset or non-enumerated context, the server
- MUST return a BAD response.
-
- SUBSTRING attribute comparator value
- Entries which contain the specified value, using the
- specified comparator. If the specified comparator doesn't
- support substring matching, a BAD response is returned.
-
-
- 6.4.2. ENTRY Intermediate Response
-
- Data: entry name
- entry data
-
- The ENTRY intermediate response occurs as a result of a SEARCH or
- STORE command. This is the means by which dataset entries are
- returned to the client.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 37]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The ENTRY response begins with the entry name, if a SEARCH command
- without the DEPTH modifier was issued, or the entry path in other
- cases. This is followed by a set of zero or more items, one for
- each metadata item in the RETURN search modifier. Results
- matching an attribute pattern or returning multiple metadata items
- are grouped in parentheses.
-
- 6.4.3. MODTIME Intermediate Response
-
- Data: modtime value
-
- The MODTIME intermediate response occurs as a result of a SEARCH
- command. It indicates that the just created context or the
- previously returned ENTRY responses include all updates to the
- returned entries up to and including the modtime value in the
- argument.
-
- 6.4.4. REFER Intermediate Response
-
- Data: dataset path
- relative ACAP URLs
-
- The REFER intermediate response occurs as a result of a
- multi-level SEARCH where one of the levels is located on a
- different server. The response indicates the dataset which is not
- located on the current server and one or more relative ACAP URLs
- for where that dataset may be found.
-
- 6.4.5. Search Examples
-
- Here are some SEARCH command exchanges between the client and server:
-
- C: A046 SEARCH "/addressbook/" DEPTH 3 RETURN ("addressbook.Alias"
- "addressbook.Email" "addressbook.List") OR NOT EQUAL
- "addressbook.Email" "i;octet" NIL NOT EQUAL
- "addressbook.List" "i;octet" NIL
- S: A046 ENTRY "/addressbook/user/joe/A0345" "fred"
- "fred@stone.org" NIL
- S: A046 ENTRY "/addressbook/user/fred/A0537" "joe" "joe@stone.org"
- NIL
- S: A046 ENTRY "/addressbook/group/Dinosaur Operators/A423"
- "saurians" NIL "1"
- S: A046 MODTIME "19970728105252"
- S: A046 OK "SEARCH completed"
-
- C: A047 SEARCH "/addressbook/user/fred/" RETURN ("*") EQUAL "entry"
- "i;octet" "A0345"
- S: A047 ENTRY "A0345" (("modtime" "19970728102226")
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 38]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- ("addressbook.Alias" "fred") ("addressbook.Email"
- "fred@stone.org") ("addressbook.CommonName"
- "Fred Flintstone") ("addressbook.Surname" "Flintstone")
- ("addressbook.GivenName" "Fred"))
- S: A047 MODTIME "19970728105258"
- S: A047 OK "SEARCH completed"
-
- C: A048 SEARCH "/options/~/vendor.example/" RETURN
- ("option.value"("size" "value" "myrights"))
- SORT ("entry" "i;octet") COMPARE "modtime" "i;octet"
- "19970727123225"
- S: A048 ENTRY "blurdybloop" (5 "ghoti" "rwia")
- S: A048 ENTRY "buckybits" (2 "10" "rwia")
- S: A048 ENTRY "windowSize" (7 "100x100" "rwia")
- S: A048 MODTIME "19970728105304"
- S: A048 OK "SEARCH completed"
-
- C: A049 SEARCH "/addressbook/~/public" RETURN ("addressbook.Alias"
- "addressbook.Email") MAKECONTEXT ENUMERATE "blob" LIMIT 100 1
- SORT ("addressbook.Alias" "i;octet") NOT EQUAL
- "addressbook.Email" NIL
- S: A049 ENTRY "A437" "aaguy" "aaguy@stone.org"
- S: A049 MODTIME "19970728105308"
- S: A049 OK (TOOMANY 347) "Context 'blob' created"
-
- C: A050 SEARCH "blob" RANGE 2 2 "19970728105308" ALL
- S: A050 ENTRY "A238" "abguy" "abguy@stone.org"
- S: A050 MODTIME "19970728105310"
- S: A050 OK "SEARCH Completed"
-
- 6.5. Contexts
-
- The following commands use contexts created by a SEARCH command with
- a MAKECONTEXT modifier.
-
-
- 6.5.1. FREECONTEXT Command
-
- Arguments: context name
-
- Data: no specific data for this command
-
- Result: OK - freecontext completed
- NO - freecontext failure: no such context
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 39]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The FREECONTEXT command causes the server to free all state
- associated with the named context. The context may no longer be
- searched and the server will no longer issue any untagged
- responses for the context. The context is no longer counted
- against the server's limit on the number of contexts.
-
- Example: C: A683 FREECONTEXT "blurdybloop"
- S: A683 OK "Freecontext completed"
-
-
- 6.5.2. UPDATECONTEXT Command
-
- Arguments: list of context names
-
- Data: untagged responses: ADDTO REMOVEFROM CHANGE MODTIME
-
- Result: OK - Updatecontext completed: all updates completed
- NO - Updatecontext failed: no such context
- not a notify context
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The UPDATECONTEXT command causes the server to ensure that the
- client is notified of all changes known to the server for the
- contexts listed as arguments up to the current time. The contexts
- listed in the arguments must have been previously given to a
- successful SEARCH command with a MAKECONTEXT NOTIFY modifier. A
- MODTIME untagged response MUST be returned if any read-write
- metadata in the context changed since the last MODTIME for that
- context. This includes metadata which is not listed in the RETURN
- modifier for the context.
-
- While a server may issue untagged ADDTO, REMOVEFROM, CHANGE, and
- MODTIME at any time, the UPDATECONTEXT command is used to "prod"
- the server to send any notifications it has not sent yet.
-
- The UPDATECONTEXT command SHOULD NOT be used to poll for updates.
-
- Example: C: Z4S9 UPDATECONTEXT "blurdybloop" "blarfl"
- S: Z4S9 OK "client has been notified of all changes"
-
-
- 6.5.3. ADDTO Untagged Response
-
- Data: context name
- entry name
- position
- metadata list
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 40]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The untagged ADDTO response informs the client that an entry has
- been added to a context. The response includes the position
- number of the added entry (the first entry in the context is
- numbered 1) and those metadata contained in the entry which match
- the RETURN statement when the context was created.
-
- For enumerated contexts, the ADDTO response implicitly adds one to
- the position of all members of the context which had position
- numbers that were greater than or equal to the ADDTO position
- number. For non-enumerated contexts, the position field is always
- 0.
-
- Example: S: * ADDTO "blurdybloop" "fred" 15
- ("addressbook.Email" "fred@stone.org")
-
-
- 6.5.4. REMOVEFROM Untagged Response
-
- Data: context name
- entry name
- old position
-
- The untagged REMOVEFROM response informs the client that an entry
- has been removed from a context. The response includes the
- position number that the removed entry used to have (the first
- entry in the context is numbered 1).
-
- For enumerated contexts, the REMOVEFROM response implicitly
- subtracts one from the position numbers of all members of the
- context which had position numbers greater than the REMOVEFROM
- position number. For non-enumerated contexts, the position field
- is always 0.
-
- Example: S: * REMOVEFROM "blurdybloop" "fred" 15
-
-
- 6.5.5. CHANGE Untagged Response
-
- Data: context name
- entry name
- old position
- new position
- metadata list
-
- The untagged CHANGE response informs the client that an entry in a
- context has either changed position in the context or has changed
- the values of one or more of the attributes specified in the
- RETURN modifier when the context was created.
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 41]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The response includes the previous and current position numbers of
- the entry (which are 0 if ENUMERATE was not specified on the
- context) and the attribute metadata requested in the RETURN
- modifier when the context was created.
-
- For enumerated contexts, the CHANGE response implicitly changes
- the position numbers of all entries which had position numbers
- between the old and new position. If old position is less than
- new position, than one is subtracted from all entries which had
- position numbers in that range. Otherwise one is added to all
- entries which had position numbers in that range. If the old
- position and new position are the same, then no implicit position
- renumbering occurs.
-
- CHANGE responses are not issued for entries which have changed
- position implicitly due to another ADDTO, REMOVEFROM or CHANGE
- response.
-
- Example: S: * CHANGE "blurdybloop" "fred" 15 10
- ("addressbook.Email" "fred@stone.org")
-
-
- 6.5.6. MODTIME Untagged Response
-
- Data: context name
- modtime value
-
- The untagged MODTIME response informs the client that it has
- received all updates to entries in the context which have modtime
- values less than or equal to the modtime value in the argument.
-
- Example: S: * MODTIME mycontext "19970320162338"
-
- 6.6. Dataset modification
-
- The following commands and responses handle modification of datasets.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 42]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 6.6.1. STORE Command
-
- Arguments: entry store list
-
- Data: intermediate responses: ENTRY
-
- Result: OK - store completed
- NO - store failure: can't store that name
- UNCHANGEDSINCE specified and entry changed
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
- invalid UTF-8 syntax in attribute name
-
-
- Creates, modifies, or deletes the named entries in the named
- datasets. The values of metadata not specified in the command are
- not changed. Setting the "value" metadata of an attribute to NIL
- removes that attribute from the entry. Setting the "value" of the
- "entry" attribute to NIL removes that entry from the dataset and
- cancels inheritance for the entire entry. Setting the "value" of
- the "entry" attribute to DEFAULT removes that entry from the
- inheriting dataset and reverts the entry and its attributes to
- inherited values, if any. Changing the value of the "entry"
- attribute renames the entry.
-
- Storing DEFAULT to the "value" metadata of an attribute is
- equivalent to storing NIL, except that inheritance is enabled for
- that attribute. If a non-NIL value is inherited then an ENTRY
- intermediate response is generated to notify the client of the
- this change. The ENTRY response includes the entry-path and the
- attribute name and value metadata for each attribute which
- reverted to a non-NIL inherited setting.
-
- Storing NIL to the "value" metadata of an attribute MAY be treated
- equivalent to storing DEFAULT to that "value" if there is a NIL
- value in the base dataset.
-
- The STORE command is followed by one or more entry store lists.
- Each entry store list begins with an entry path followed by STORE
- modifiers, followed by zero or more attribute store items. Each
- attribute store item is made up of the attribute name followed by
- NIL (to remove the attribute's value), DEFAULT (to revert the item
- to any inherited value), a single value (to set the attribute's
- single value), or a list of metadata items to modify. The
- following STORE modifiers may be specified:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 43]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- NOCREATE
- By default, the server MUST create any datasets necessary to
- store the entry, including multiple hierarchy levels. If
- NOCREATE is specified, the STORE command will fail with a
- NOEXIST error unless the parent dataset already exists.
-
- UNCHANGEDSINCE
- If the "modtime" of the entry is later than the
- unchangedsince time, then the store fails with a MODIFIED
- response code. Use of UNCHANGEDSINCE with a time of
- "00000101000000" will always fail if the entry exists.
- Clients writing to a shared dataset are encouraged to use
- UNCHANGEDSINCE when modifying an existing entry.
-
-
- The server MUST either make all the changes specified in a single
- STORE command or make none of them. If successful, the server
- MUST update the "modtime" attribute for every entry which was
- changed.
-
- It is illegal to list any metadata item within an attribute twice,
- any attribute within an entry twice or any entry path twice. The
- server MUST return a BAD response if this happens.
-
- The server MAY re-order the strings in a multi-value on STORE and
- MAY remove duplicate strings. However, SEARCH MUST return multi-
- values and the associated size list metadata in a consistant
- order.
-
-
- Example: C: A342 STORE ("/addressbook/user/fred/ABC547"
- "addressbook.TelephoneNumber" "555-1234"
- "addressbook.CommonName" "Barney Rubble"
- "addressbook.AlternateNames" ("value"
- ("Barnacus Rubble" "Coco Puffs Thief"))
- "addressbook.Email" NIL)
- S: A342 OK "Store completed"
- C: A343 STORE ("/addressbook/user/joe/ABD42"
- UNCHANGEDSINCE "19970320162338"
- "user.joe.hair-length" "10 inches")
- S: A343 NO (MODIFIED) "'ABD42' has been changed
- by somebody else."
- C: A344 STORE ("/addressbook/group/Developers/ACD54"
- "entry" NIL)
- S: A344 OK "Store completed"
- C: A345 STORE ("/option/~/common/SMTPserver"
- "option.value" DEFAULT)
- S: A345 ENTRY "/option/~/common/SMTPserver"
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 44]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- "option.value" "smtp.server.do.main"
- S: A345 OK "Store completed"
- C: A347 STORE ("/addressbook/~/" "dataset.inherit"
- "/addressbook/group/Developers")
- S: A347 OK "Store completed"
-
-
- 6.6.2. DELETEDSINCE Command
-
- Arguments: dataset name
- time
-
- Data: intermediate response: DELETED
-
- Result: OK - DELETEDSINCE completed
- NO - DELETEDSINCE failure: can't read dataset
- date too far in the past
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The DELETEDSINCE command returns in intermediate DELETED replies
- the names of entries that have been deleted from the named dataset
- since the given time.
-
- Servers may impose a limit on the number or age of deleted entry
- names they keep track of. If the server does not have information
- going back to the specified time, the command fails, returning a
- TOOOLD response code in the tagged NO response.
-
- Example: C: Z4S9 DELETEDSINCE "/folder/site/" 19951205103412
- S: Z4S9 DELETED "blurdybloop"
- S: Z4S9 DELETED "anteaters"
- S: Z4S9 OK "DELETEDSINCE completed"
- C: Z4U3 DELETEDSINCE "/folder/site/" 19951009040854
- S: Z4U3 NO (TOOOLD) "Don't have that information"
-
-
- 6.6.3. DELETED Intermediate Response
-
- Data: entry name
-
- The intermediate DELETED response occurs as a result of a
- DELETEDSINCE command. It returns an entry that has been deleted
- from the dataset specified in the DELETEDSINCE command.
-
- 6.7. Access Control List Commands
-
- The commands in this section are used to manage access control lists.
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 45]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- 6.7.1. SETACL Command
-
- Arguments: acl object
- authentication identifier
- access rights
-
- Data: no specific data for this command
-
- Result: OK - setacl completed
- NO - setacl failure: can't set acl
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The SETACL command changes the access control list on the
- specified object so that the specified identifier is granted the
- permissions enumerated in rights. If the object did not
- previously have an access control list, one is created.
-
-
- Example: C: A123 SETACL ("/addressbook/~/public/") "anyone" "r"
- S: A123 OK "Setacl complete"
- C: A124 SETACL ("/folder/site/") "B1FF" "rwa"
- S: A124 NO (PERMISSION ("/folder/site/")) "'B1FF' not
- permitted to modify access rights
- for '/folder/site/'"
-
-
-
- 6.7.2. DELETEACL Command
-
- Arguments: acl object
- optional authentication identifier
-
- Data: no specific data for this command
-
- Result: OK - deleteacl completed
- NO - deleteacl failure: can't delete acl
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- If given the optional identifier argument, the DELETEACL command
- removes any portion of the access control list on the specified
- object for the specified identifier.
-
- If not given the optional identifier argument, the DELETEACL
- command removes the ACL from the object entirely, causing access
- to be controlled by a higher-level default ACL. This form of the
- DELETEACL command is not permitted on the default ACL for a
- dataset and servers MUST return a BAD.
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 46]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- Example: C: A223 DELETEACL ("/addressbook/~/public") "anyone"
- S: A223 OK "Deleteacl complete"
- C: A224 DELETEACL ("/folder/site")
- S: A224 BAD "Can't delete ACL from dataset"
- C: A225 DELETEACL ("/addressbook/user/fred"
- "addressbook.Email" "barney")
- S: A225 OK "Deleteacl complete"
-
-
- 6.7.3. MYRIGHTS Command
-
- Arguments: acl object
-
- Data: intermediate responses: MYRIGHTS
-
- Result: OK - myrights completed
- NO - myrights failure: can't get rights
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
- The MYRIGHTS command returns the set of rights that the client has
- to the given dataset or dataset attribute.
-
-
- Example: C: A003 MYRIGHTS ("/folder/site")
- S: A003 MYRIGHTS "r"
- S: A003 OK "Myrights complete"
-
-
- 6.7.4. MYRIGHTS Intermediate Response
-
- Data: rights
-
- The MYRIGHTS response occurs as a result of a MYRIGHTS command.
- The argument is the set of rights that the client has for the
- object referred to in the MYRIGHTS command.
-
- 6.7.5. LISTRIGHTS Command
-
- Arguments: acl object
- authentication identifier
-
- Data: untagged responses: LISTRIGHTS
-
- Result: OK - listrights completed
- NO - listrights failure: can't get rights list
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 47]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The LISTRIGHTS command takes an object and an identifier and
- returns information about what rights the current user may revoke
- or grant to that identifier in the ACL for that object.
-
- Example: C: a001 LISTRIGHTS ("/folder/~/") "smith"
- S: a001 LISTRIGHTS "xra" "w" "i"
- S: a001 OK Listrights completed
- C: a005 LISTRIGHTS ("/folder/site/archive/imap") "anyone"
- S: a005 LISTRIGHTS "" "x" "r" "w" "i"
- S: a005 OK Listrights completed
-
-
-
- 6.7.6. LISTRIGHTS Intermediate Response
-
- Data: required rights
- list of optional rights
-
- The LISTRIGHTS response occurs as a result of a LISTRIGHTS
- command. The first argument is a string containing the (possibly
- empty) set of rights the identifier will always be granted on the
- dataset or attribute.
-
- Following this are zero or more strings each containing a single
- right which the current user may revoke or grant to the identifier
- in the dataset or attribute.
-
- The same right MUST NOT be listed more than once in the LISTRIGHTS
- response.
-
-
- 6.8. Quotas
-
- The section defines the commands and responses relating to quotas.
-
-
- 6.8.1. GETQUOTA Command
-
- Arguments: dataset
-
- Data: untagged responses: QUOTA
-
- Result: OK - Quota information returned
- NO - Quota failure: can't access resource limit
- no resource limit
- BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 48]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- The GETQUOTA command takes the name of a dataset, and returns in
- an untagged QUOTA response the name of the dataset, quota limit in
- bytes that applies to that dataset and the quota usage within that
- limit. The scope of a quota limit is implementation dependent.
-
- Example: C: A043 GETQUOTA "/option/user/fred/common"
- S: * QUOTA "/option/user/fred/common" 1048576 2475
- S: A043 OK "Getquota completed"
-
-
- 6.8.3. QUOTA Untagged Response
-
- Data: dataset
- quota limit in bytes
- amount of quota limit used
- extension data
-
- The QUOTA untagged response is generated as a result of a GETQUOTA
- command or MAY be generated by the server in response to a SEARCH
- or STORE command to warn about high usage of a quota. It includes
- the name of the applicable dataset, the quota limit in bytes, the
- quota usage and some optional extension data. Clients MUST
- tolerate the extension data as its use is reserved for a future
- extension.
-
- 6.9. Extensions
-
- In order to simplify the process of extending the protocol, clients
- MUST tolerate unknown server responses which meet the syntax of
- response-extend. In addition, clients MUST tolerate unknown server
- response codes which meet the syntax of resp-code-ext. Availability
- of new commands MUST be announced via a capability on the initial
- greeting line and such commands SHOULD meet the syntax of
- command-extend.
-
- Servers MUST respond to unknown commands with a BAD command
- completion result. Servers MUST skip over non-synchronizing literals
- contained in an unknown command. This may be done by assuming the
- unknown command matches the command-extend syntax, or by reading a
- line at a time and checking for the non-synchronizing literal syntax
- at the end of the line.
-
- 7. Registration Procedures
-
- ACAP's usefulness comes from providing a structured storage model for
- all sorts of configuration data. However, for its potential to be
- achieved, it is important that the Internet community strives for the
- following goals:
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 49]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- (1) Standardization. It is very important to standardize dataset
- classes. The authors hope that ACAP achieves the success that SNMP
- has seen with the definition of numerous standards track MIBs.
-
- (2) Community Review. In the absence of standardization, it is
- important to get community review on a proposal to improve its
- engineering quality. Community review is strongly recommended prior
- to registration. The ACAP implementors mailing list
- <ietf-acap@andrew.cmu.edu> should be used for this purpose.
-
- (3) Registration. Registration serves a two-fold purpose. First it
- prevents use of the same name for different purposes, and second it
- provides a one-stop list which can be used to locate existing
- extensions or dataset classes to prevent duplicate work.
-
- The following registration templates may be used to register ACAP
- protocol elements with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
- (IANA).
-
- 7.1. ACAP Capabilities
-
- New ACAP capabilities MUST be registered prior to use. Careful
- consideration should be made before extending the protocol, as it can
- lead to complexity or interoperability problems. Review of proposals
- on the acap implementors mailing list is strongly encouraged prior to
- registration.
-
- To: iana@iana.org
- Subject: Registration of ACAP capability
-
- Capability name:
-
- Capability keyword:
-
- Capability arguments:
-
- Published Specification(s):
-
- (Optional, but strongly encouraged)
-
- Person and email address to contact for further information:
-
- 7.2. ACAP Response Codes
-
- ACAP response codes are registered on a first come, first served
- basis. Review of proposals on the acap implementors mailing list is
- strongly encouraged prior to registration.
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 50]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- To: iana@iana.org
- Subject: Registration of ACAP response code
-
- Response Code:
-
- Arguments (use ABNF to specify syntax):
-
- Purpose:
-
- Published Specification(s):
-
- (Optional, but strongly encouraged)
-
- Person and email address to contact for further information:
-
- 7.3. Dataset Classes
-
- A dataset class provides a core set of attributes for use in a
- specified hierarchy. It may also define rules for the dataset
- hierarchy underneath that class. Dataset class specifications must
- be standards track or IESG approved experimental RFCs.
-
- To: iana@iana.org
- Subject: Registration of ACAP dataset class
-
- Dataset class name/attribute prefix:
-
- Purpose:
-
- Published Specification(s):
-
- (Standards track or IESG approved experimental RFC)
-
- Person and email address to contact for further information:
-
- 7.4. Vendor Subtree
-
- Vendors may reserve a portion of the ACAP namespace for private use.
- Dataset class names beginning with "vendor.<company/product name>."
- are reserved for use by that company or product. In addition, all
- attribute names beginning with "vendor.<company/product name>." are
- reserved for use by that company or product once registered.
- Registration is on a first come, first served basis. Whenever
- possible, private attributes and dataset classes should be avoided in
- favor of improving interoperable dataset class definitions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 51]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- To: iana@iana.org
- Subject: Registration of ACAP vendor subtree
-
- Private Prefix: vendor.<company/product name>.
-
- Person and email address to contact for further information:
-
- (company names and addresses should be included when appropriate)
-
- 8. Formal Syntax
-
- The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur
- Form (BNF) notation as specified in [ABNF]. This uses the ABNF core
- rules as specified in Appendix A of the ABNF specification [ABNF].
-
- Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are
- case-insensitive. The use of upper or lower case characters to
- define token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations
- MUST accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.
-
- The "initial-greeting" rule below defines the initial ACAP greeting
- from the server. The "command" rule below defines the syntax for
- commands sent by the client. The "response" rule below defines the
- syntax for responses sent by the server.
-
- ATOM-CHAR = "!" / %x23-27 / %x2A-5B / %x5D-7A / %x7C-7E
- ;; Any CHAR except ATOM-SPECIALS
-
- ATOM-SPECIALS = "(" / ")" / "{" / SP / CTL / QUOTED-SPECIALS
-
- CHAR = %x01-7F
-
- DIGIT-NZ = %x31-39
- ; non-zero digits ("1" - "9")
-
- QUOTED-CHAR = SAFE-UTF8-CHAR / "\" QUOTED-SPECIALS
-
- QUOTED-SPECIALS = <"> / "\"
-
- SAFE-CHAR = %x01-09 / %x0B-0C / %x0E-21 /
- %x23-5B / %x5D-7F
- ;; any TEXT-CHAR except QUOTED-SPECIALS
-
- SAFE-UTF8-CHAR = SAFE-CHAR / UTF8-2 / UTF8-3 / UTF8-4 /
- UTF8-5 / UTF8-6
-
- TAG-CHAR = %x21 / %x23-27 / %x2C-5B / %x5D-7A / %x7C-7E
- ;; Any ATOM-CHAR except "*" or "+"
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 52]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- TEXT-CHAR = %x01-09 / %x0B-0C / %x0E-7F
- ;; any CHAR except CR and LF
-
- TEXT-UTF8-CHAR = SAFE-UTF8-CHAR / QUOTED-SPECIALS
-
- UTF8-1 = %x80-BF
-
- UTF8-2 = %xC0-DF UTF8-1
-
- UTF8-3 = %xE0-EF 2UTF8-1
-
- UTF8-4 = %xF0-F7 3UTF8-1
-
- UTF8-5 = %xF8-FB 4UTF8-1
-
- UTF8-6 = %xFC-FD 5UTF8-1
-
- UTF8-CHAR = TEXT-UTF8-CHAR / CR / LF
-
- acl = "(" [acl-identrights *(SP acl-identrights)] ")"
- *(SPACE acl-identrights)] ")"
-
- acl-identifier = string-utf8
- ;; MUST NOT contain HTAB
-
- acl-identrights = string-utf8
- ;; The identifier followed by a HTAB,
- ;; followed by the rights.
-
- acl-delobject = "(" dataset SP attribute [SP entry-name] ")"
-
- acl-object = "(" dataset [SP attribute [SP entry-name]] ")"
-
- acl-rights = quoted
-
- atom = ALPHA *1023ATOM-CHAR
-
- attribute = string-utf8
- ;; dot-separated attribute name
- ;; MUST NOT contain "*" or "%"
-
- attribute-store = attribute SP (value-nildef /
- "(" 1*(metadata-write-q SP value-store) ")")
- ;; MUST NOT include the same metadata twice
-
- auth-type = <"> auth-type-name <">
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 53]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- auth-type-name = iana-token
- ;; as defined in SASL [SASL]
-
- command = tag SP (command-any / command-auth /
- command-nonauth) CRLF
- ;; Modal based on state
-
- command-authent = "AUTHENTICATE" SP auth-type
- [SP string] *(CRLF string)
-
- command-any = "NOOP" / command-lang / "LOGOUT" /
- command-extend
-
- command-auth = command-delacl / command-dsince /
- command-freectx / command-getquota /
- command-lrights / command-myrights /
- command-search / command-setacl /
- command-store
- ;; only valid in authenticated state
-
- command-delacl = "DELETEACL" SP acl-delobject [SP acl-identifier]
-
- command-dsince = "DELETEDSINCE" SP dataset SP time
-
- command-extend = extend-token [SP extension-data]
-
- command-freectx = "FREECONTEXT" SP context
-
- command-getquota = "GETQUOTA" SP dataset
-
- command-lang = "LANG" *(SP lang-tag)
-
- command-lrights = "LISTRIGHTS" SP acl-object
-
- command-myrights = "MYRIGHTS" SP acl-object
-
- command-nonauth = command-authent
- ;; only valid in non-authenticated state
-
- command-search = "SEARCH" SP (dataset / context)
- *(SP search-modifier) SP search-criteria
- ;; MUST NOT include same search-modifier twice
-
- command-setacl = "SETACL" SP acl-object SP acl-identifier
- SP acl-rights
-
- command-store = "STORE" SP store-entry-list
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 54]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- comparator = <"> comparator-name <">
-
- comparator-name = ["+" / "-"] iana-token
-
- context = string-utf8
- ;; MUST NOT begin with slash ("/")
-
- dataset = string-utf8
- ;; slash-separated dataset name
- ;; begins with slash
-
- entry = entry-name / entry-path
-
- entry-name = string-utf8
- ;; entry name MUST NOT contain slash
- ;; MUST NOT begin with "."
-
- entry-path = string-utf8
- ;; slash-separated path to entry
- ;; begins with slash
-
- entry-relative = string-utf8
- ;; potentially relative path to entry
-
- extend-token = atom
- ;; MUST be defined by a standards track or
- ;; IESG approved experimental protocol extension
-
- extension-data = extension-item *(SP extension-item)
-
- extension-item = extend-token / string / number /
- "(" [extension-data] ")"
-
- iana-token = atom
- ;; MUST be registered with IANA
-
- initial-greeting = "*" SP "ACAP" *(SP "(" init-capability ")") CRLF
-
- init-capability = init-cap-context / init-cap-extend /
- init-cap-implem / init-cap-sasl
-
- init-cap-context = "CONTEXTLIMIT" SP string
-
- init-cap-extend = iana-token [SP string-list]
-
- init-cap-implem = "IMPLEMENTATION" SP string
-
- init-cap-sasl = "SASL" SP string-list
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 55]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- lang-tag = <"> Language-Tag <">
- ;; Language-Tag rule is defined in [LANG-TAGS]
-
- literal = "{" number [ "+" ] "}" CRLF *OCTET
- ;; The number represents the number of octets
- ;; MUST be literal-utf8 except for values
-
- literal-utf8 = "{" number [ "+" ] "}" CRLF *UTF8-CHAR
- ;; The number represents the number of octets
- ;; not the number of characters
-
- metadata = attribute [ "(" metadata-type-list ")" ]
- ;; attribute MAY end in "*" as wildcard.
-
- metadata-list = metadata *(SP metadata)
-
- metadata-type = "attribute" / "myrights" / "size" /
- "count" / metadata-write
-
- metadata-type-q = <"> metadata-type <">
-
- metadata-type-list = metadata-type-q *(SP metadata-type-q)
-
- metadata-write = "value" / "acl"
-
- metadata-write-q = <"> metadata-write <">
-
- nil = "NIL"
-
- number = *DIGIT
- ;; A 32-bit unsigned number.
- ;; (0 <= n < 4,294,967,296)
-
- nz-number = DIGIT-NZ *DIGIT
- ;; A 32-bit unsigned non-zero number.
- ;; (0 < n < 4,294,967,296)
-
- position = number
- ;; "0" if context is not enumerated
- ;; otherwise this is non-zero
-
- quota-limit = number
-
- quota-usage = number
-
- quoted = <"> *QUOTED-CHAR <">
- ;; limited to 1024 octets between the <">s
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 56]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- response = response-addto / response-alert / response-bye /
- response-change / response-cont /
- response-deleted / response-done /
- response-entry / response-extend /
- response-listr / response-lang /
- response-mtimei / response-mtimeu /
- response-myright / response-quota /
- response-refer / response-remove / response-stat
-
- response-addto = "*" SP "ADDTO" SP context SP entry-name
- SP position SP return-data-list
-
- response-alert = "*" SP "ALERT" SP resp-body CRLF
- ;; Client MUST display alert text to user
-
- response-bye = "*" SP "BYE" SP resp-body CRLF
- ;; Server will disconnect condition
-
- response-change = "*" SP "CHANGE" SP context SP entry-name
- SP position SP position SP return-data-list
-
- response-cont = "+" SP string
-
- response-deleted = tag SP "DELETED" SP entry-name
-
- response-done = tag SP resp-cond-state CRLF
-
- response-entry = tag SP "ENTRY" SP entry SP return-data-list
-
- response-extend = (tag / "*") SP extend-token [SP extension-data]
-
- response-lang = "*" SP "LANG" SP lang-tag 1*(SP comparator)
-
- response-listr = tag SP "LISTRIGHTS" SP acl-rights
- *(SP acl-rights)
-
- response-mtimei = tag SP "MODTIME" SP time
-
- response-mtimeu = "*" SP "MODTIME" SP context SP time
-
- response-myright = tag SP "MYRIGHTS" SP acl-rights
-
- response-quota = "*" SP "QUOTA" SP dataset SP quota-limit
- SP quota-usage [SP extension-data]
-
- response-refer = tag SP "REFER" SP dataset
- 1*(SP <"> url-relative <">)
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 57]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- response-remove = "*" SP "REMOVEFROM" SP context SP
- entry-name SP position
-
- response-stat = "*" SP resp-cond-state CRLF
-
- resp-body = ["(" resp-code ")" SP] quoted
-
- resp-code = "AUTH-TOO-WEAK" / "ENCRYPT-NEEDED" /
- resp-code-inval / resp-code-mod /
- resp-code-noexist / resp-code-perm / "QUOTA" /
- resp-code-refer / resp-code-sasl /
- resp-code-toomany / "TOOOLD" /
- "TRANSITION-NEEDED" / "TRYFREECONTEXT" /
- "TRYLATER" / "WAYTOOMANY" / resp-code-ext
-
- resp-code-ext = iana-token [SP extension-data]
- ;; unknown codes MUST be tolerated by the client
-
- resp-code-inval = "INVALID" 1*(SP entry-path SP attribute)
-
- resp-code-mod = "MODIFIED" SP entry-path
-
- resp-code-noexist = "NOEXIST" SP dataset
-
- resp-code-perm = "PERMISSION" SP acl-object
-
- resp-code-refer = "REFER" 1*(SP <"> url-relative <">)
-
- resp-code-sasl = "SASL" SP string
-
- resp-code-toomany = "TOOMANY" SP nz-number
-
- resp-cond-state = ("OK" / "NO" / "BAD") SP resp-body
- ;; Status condition
-
- return-attr-list = "(" return-metalist *(SP return-metalist) ")"
- ;; occurs when "*" in RETURN pattern on SEARCH
-
- return-data = return-metadata / return-metalist /
- return-attr-list
-
- return-data-list = return-data *(SP return-data)
-
- return-metalist = "(" return-metadata *(SP return-metadata) ")"
- ;; occurs when multiple metadata items requested
-
- return-metadata = nil / string / value-list / acl
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 58]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- searchkey-equal = "EQUAL" SP attribute SP comparator SP value-nil
-
- searchkey-comp = "COMPARE" SP attribute SP comparator SP value
-
- searchkey-prefix = "PREFIX" SP attribute SP comparator SP value
-
- searchkey-range = "RANGE" SP nz-number SP nz-number SP time
-
- searchkey-strict = "COMPARESTRICT" SP attribute SP comparator
- SP value
-
- searchkey-substr = "SUBSTRING" SP attribute SP comparator SP value
-
- searchmod-depth = "DEPTH" SP number
-
- searchmod-hard = "HARDLIMIT" SP nz-number
-
- searchmod-limit = "LIMIT" SP number SP number
-
- searchmod-make = "MAKECONTEXT" [SP "ENUMERATE"]
- [SP "NOTIFY"] SP context
-
- searchmod-ninh = "NOINHERIT"
-
- searchmod-return = "RETURN" SP "(" [metadata-list] ")"
-
- searchmod-sort = "SORT" SP "(" sort-list ")"
-
- search-criteria = "ALL" / searchkey-equal / searchkey-comp /
- searchkey-strict / searchkey-range /
- searchkey-prefix / searchkey-substr /
- "NOT" SP search-criteria /
- "OR" SP search-criteria SP search-criteria /
- "AND" SP search-criteria SP search-criteria
-
- search-modifier = searchmod-depth / searchmod-hard /
- searchmod-limit / searchmod-make /
- searchmod-ninh / searchmod-return /
- searchmod-sort
-
- sort-list = sort-item *(SP sort-item)
-
- sort-item = attribute SP comparator
-
- store-entry = "(" entry-path *(SP store-modifier)
- *(SP attribute-store) ")"
- ;; MUST NOT include same store-modifier twice
- ;; MUST NOT include same attribute twice
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 59]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- store-entry-list = store-entry *(SP store-entry)
- ;; MUST NOT include same entry twice
-
- store-modifier = store-mod-unchang / store-mod-nocreate
-
- store-mod-nocreate = "NOCREATE"
-
- store-mod-unchang = "UNCHANGEDSINCE" SP time
-
- string = quoted / literal
-
- string-list = string *(SP string)
-
- string-utf8 = quoted / literal-utf8
-
- tag = 1*32TAG-CHAR
-
- time = <"> time-year time-month time-day time-hour
- time-minute time-second time-subsecond <">
- ;; Timestamp in UTC
-
- time-day = 2DIGIT ;; 01-31
-
- time-hour = 2DIGIT ;; 00-23
-
- time-minute = 2DIGIT ;; 00-59
-
- time-month = 2DIGIT ;; 01-12
-
- time-second = 2DIGIT ;; 00-60
-
- time-subsecond = *DIGIT
-
- time-year = 4DIGIT
-
- value = string
-
- value-list = "(" [value *(SP value)] ")"
-
- value-nil = value / nil
-
- value-nildef = value-nil / "DEFAULT"
-
- value-store = value-nildef / value-list / acl
-
- url-acap = "acap://" url-server "/" url-enc-entry
- [url-filter] [url-extension]
- ;; url-enc-entry interpreted relative to "/"
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 60]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- url-attr-list = url-enc-attr *("&" url-enc-attr)
-
- url-auth = ";AUTH=" ("*" / url-enc-auth)
-
- url-achar = uchar / "&" / "=" / "~"
- ;; See RFC 1738 for definition of "uchar"
-
- url-char = uchar / "=" / "~" / ":" / "@" / "/"
- ;; See RFC 1738 for definition of "uchar"
-
- url-enc-attr = 1*url-char
- ;; encoded version of attribute name
-
- url-enc-auth = 1*url-achar
- ;; encoded version of auth-type-name above
-
- url-enc-entry = 1*url-char
- ;; encoded version of entry-relative above
-
- url-enc-user = *url-achar
- ;; encoded version of login userid
-
- url-extension = *("?" 1*url-char)
-
- url-filter = "?" url-attr-list
-
- url-relative = url-acap / [url-enc-entry] [url-filter]
- ;; url-enc-entry is relative to base URL
-
- url-server = [url-enc-user [url-auth] "@"] hostport
- ;; See RFC 1738 for definition of "hostport"
-
- 9. Multi-lingual Considerations
-
- The IAB charset workshop [IAB-CHARSET] came to a number of
- conclusions which influenced the design of ACAP. The decision to use
- UTF-8 as the character encoding scheme was based on that work. The
- LANG command to negotiate a language for error messages is also
- included.
-
- Section 3.4.5 of the IAB charset workshop report states that there
- should be a way to identify the natural language for human readable
- strings. Several promising proposals have been made for use within
- ACAP, but no clear consensus on a single method is apparent at this
- stage. The following rules are likely to permit the addition of
- multi-lingual support in the future:
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 61]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- (1) A work in progress called Multi-Lingual String Format (MLSF)
- proposes a layer on top of UTF-8 which uses otherwise illegal UTF-8
- sequences to store language tags. In order to permit its addition to
- a future version of this standard, client-side UTF-8 interpreters
- MUST be able to silently ignore illegal multi-byte UTF-8 characters,
- and treat illegal single-byte UTF-8 characters as end of string
- markers. Servers, for the time being, MUST be able to silently
- accept illegal UTF-8 characters, except in attribute names and entry
- names. Clients MUST NOT send illegal UTF-8 characters to the server
- unless a future standard changes this rule.
-
- (2) There is a proposal to add language tags to Unicode. To support
- this, servers MUST be able to store UTF-8 characters of up to 20 bits
- of data.
-
- (3) The metadata item "language" is reserved for future use.
-
- 10. Security Considerations
-
- The AUTHENTICATE command uses SASL [SASL] to provide basic
- authentication, authorization, integrity and privacy services. This
- is described in section 6.3.1.
-
- When the CRAM-MD5 mechanism is used, the security considerations for
- the CRAM-MD5 SASL mechanism [CRAM-MD5] apply. The CRAM-MD5 mechanism
- is also susceptible to passive dictionary attacks. This means that
- if an authentication session is recorded by a passive observer, that
- observer can try common passwords through the CRAM-MD5 mechanism and
- see if the results match. This attack is reduced by using hard to
- guess passwords. Sites are encouraged to educate users and have the
- password change service test candidate passwords against a
- dictionary. ACAP implementations of CRAM-MD5 SHOULD permit passwords
- of at least 64 characters in length.
-
- ACAP protocol transactions are susceptible to passive observers or
- man in the middle attacks which alter the data, unless the optional
- encryption and integrity services of the AUTHENTICATE command are
- enabled, or an external security mechanism is used for protection.
- It may be useful to allow configuration of both clients and servers
- to refuse to transfer sensitive information in the absence of strong
- encryption.
-
- ACAP access control lists provide fine grained authorization for
- access to attributes. A number of related security issues are
- described in section 3.5.
-
- ACAP URLs have the same security considerations as IMAP URLs
- [IMAP-URL].
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 62]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- ACAP clients are encouraged to consider the security problems
- involved with a lab computer situation. Specifically, a client cache
- of ACAP configuration information MUST NOT allow access by an
- unauthorized user. One way to assure this is for an ACAP client to
- be able to completely flush any non-public cached configuration data
- when a user leaves.
-
- As laptop computers can be easily stolen and a cache of configuration
- data may contain sensitive information, a disconnected mode ACAP
- client may wish to encrypt and password protect cached configuration
- information.
-
- 11. Acknowledgments
-
- Many thanks to the follow people who have contributed to ACAP over
- the past four years: Wallace Colyer, Mark Crispin, Jack DeWinter, Rob
- Earhart, Ned Freed, Randy Gellens, Terry Gray, J. S. Greenfield,
- Steve Dorner, Steve Hole, Steve Hubert, Dave Roberts, Bart Schaefer,
- Matt Wall and other participants of the IETF ACAP working group.
-
- 12. Authors' Addresses
-
- Chris Newman
- Innosoft International, Inc.
- 1050 Lakes Drive
- West Covina, CA 91790 USA
-
- Email: chris.newman@innosoft.com
-
-
- John Gardiner Myers
- Netscape Communications
- 501 East Middlefield Road
- Mail Stop MV-029
- Mountain View, CA 94043
-
- Email: jgmyers@netscape.com
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 63]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- Appendices
-
- A. References
-
- [ABNF] Crocker, Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications:
- ABNF", RFC 2234, Internet Mail Consortium, Demon Internet Ltd,
- November 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2234.txt>
-
- [BASIC-URL] Berners-Lee, Masinter, McCahill, "Uniform Resource
- Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, CERN, Xerox Coproration, University of
- Minnesota, December 1994.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1738.txt>
-
- [CHARSET-LANG-POLICY] Alvestrand, "IETF Policy on Character Sets and
- Languages", work in progress.
-
- [CRAM-MD5] Klensin, Catoe, Krumviede, "IMAP/POP AUTHorize Extension
- for Simple Challenge/Response", RFC 2195, MCI, September 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2195.txt>
-
- [IAB-CHARSET] Weider, Preston, Simonsen, Alvestrand, Atkinson,
- Crispin, Svanberg, "The Report of the IAB Character Set Workshop held
- 29 February - 1 March, 1996", RFC 2130, April 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2130.txt>
-
- [IMAP4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version
- 4rev1", RFC 2060, University of Washington, December 1996.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2060.txt>
-
- [IMAP-ACL] Myers, J., "IMAP4 ACL extension", RFC 2086, Carnegie
- Mellon, January 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2086.txt>
-
- [IMAP-URL] Newman, "IMAP URL Scheme", RFC 2192, Innosoft, July 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2192.txt>
-
- [ISO-10646] ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993(E) "Information Technology--
- Universal Multiple-octet Coded Character Set (UCS)." See also
- amendments 1 through 7, plus editorial corrections.
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 64]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- [ISO-C] "Programming languages -- C", ISO/IEC 9899:1990,
- International Organization for Standardization. This is effectively
- the same as ANSI C standard X3.159-1989.
-
- [KEYWORDS] Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
- Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, Harvard University, March 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2119.txt>
-
- [LANG-TAGS] Alvestrand, H., "Tags for the Identification of
- Languages", RFC 1766.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1766.txt>
-
- [REL-URL] Fielding, "Relative Uniform Resource Locators", RFC 1808,
- UC Irvine, June 1995.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1808.txt>
-
- [SASL] Myers, J., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)",
- RFC 2222, Netscape Communications, October 1997.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2222.txt>
-
- [SASL-ANON] Newman, C., "Anonymous SASL Mechanism", RFC 2245,
- November 1997.
-
- [UNICODE-2] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version
- 2.0", Addison-Wesley, 1996. ISBN 0-201-48345-9.
-
- [US-ASCII] "USA Standard Code for Information Interchange," X3.4.
- American National Standards Institute: New York (1968).
-
- [UTF8] Yergeau, F. "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO
- 10646", RFC 2044, Alis Technologies, October 1996.
-
- <ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2044.txt>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 65]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- B. ACAP Keyword Index
-
-
- ACAP (untagged response) ................................... 26
- ADDTO (untagged response) .................................. 40
- ALERT (untagged response) .................................. 31
- ALL (search keyword) ....................................... 36
- AND (search keyword) ....................................... 36
- AUTH-TOO-WEAK (response code) .............................. 19
- AUTHENTICATE (command) ..................................... 31
- BAD (response) ............................................. 30
- BYE (untagged response) .................................... 30
- CHANGE (untagged response) ................................. 41
- COMPARE (search keyword) ................................... 36
- COMPARESTRICT (search keyword) ............................. 36
- CONTEXTLIMIT (ACAP capability) ............................. 27
- DELETEACL (command) ........................................ 46
- DELETED (intermediate response) ............................ 45
- DELETEDSINCE (command) ..................................... 45
- DEPTH (search modifier) .................................... 34
- ENCRYPT-NEEDED (response code) ............................. 19
- ENTRY (intermediate response) .............................. 37
- EQUAL (search keyword) ..................................... 37
- FREECONTEXT (command) ...................................... 39
- GETQUOTA (command) ......................................... 48
- HARDLIMIT (search modifier) ................................ 34
- IMPLEMENTATION (ACAP capability) ........................... 27
- INVALID (response code) .................................... 19
- LANG (command) ............................................. 28
- LANG (intermediate response) ............................... 28
- LIMIT (search modifier) .................................... 34
- LISTRIGHTS (command) ....................................... 47
- LISTRIGHTS (intermediate response) ......................... 48
- LOGOUT (command) ........................................... 29
- MAKECONTEXT (search modifier) .............................. 34
- MODIFIED (response code) ................................... 19
- MODTIME (intermediate response) ............................ 38
- MODTIME (untagged response) ................................ 42
- MYRIGHTS (command) ......................................... 47
- MYRIGHTS (intermediate response) ........................... 47
- NO (response) .............................................. 29
- NOCREATE (store modifier) .................................. 44
- NOEXIST (response code) .................................... 19
- NOINHERIT (search modifier) ................................ 35
- NOOP (command) ............................................. 27
- NOT (search keyword) ....................................... 37
- OK (response) .............................................. 29
- OR (search keyword) ........................................ 37
- PERMISSION (response code) ................................. 19
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 66]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
-
- PREFIX (search keyword) .................................... 37
- QUOTA (response code) ...................................... 19
- QUOTA (untagged response) .................................. 49
- RANGE (search keyword) ..................................... 37
- REFER (intermediate response) .............................. 38
- REFER (response code) ...................................... 19
- REMOVEFROM (untagged response) ............................. 41
- RETURN (search modifier) ................................... 35
- SASL (ACAP capability) ..................................... 27
- SASL (response code) ....................................... 20
- SEARCH (command) ........................................... 33
- SETACL (command) ........................................... 46
- SORT (search modifier) ..................................... 36
- STORE (command) ............................................ 42
- SUBSTRING (search keyword) ................................. 37
- TOOMANY (response code) .................................... 20
- TOOOLD (response code) ..................................... 20
- TRANSITION-NEEDED (response code) .......................... 20
- TRYFREECONTEXT (response code) ............................. 20
- TRYLATER (response code) ................................... 20
- UNCHANGEDSINCE (store modifier) ............................ 44
- UPDATECONTEXT (command) .................................... 40
- WAYTOOMANY (response code) ................................. 20
- acl (attribute metadata) ................................... 12
- anyone (ACL identifier) .................................... 17
- attribute (attribute metadata) ............................. 12
- dataset.acl (dataset attribute) ............................ 24
- dataset.acl.<attribute> (dataset attribute) ................ 24
- dataset.inherit (dataset attribute) ........................ 24
- entry (predefined attribute) ............................... 11
- i;ascii-casemap (comparator) ............................... 16
- i;ascii-numeric (comparator) ............................... 16
- i;octet (comparator) ....................................... 16
- modtime (predefined attribute) ............................. 11
- myrights (attribute metadata) .............................. 12
- size (attribute metadata) .................................. 13
- subdataset (predefined attribute) .......................... 11
- value (attribute metadata) ................................. 13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 67]
-
- RFC 2244 ACAP November 1997
-
-
- C. Full Copyright Statement
-
- Copyright (C) The Internet Society 1997. All Rights Reserved.
-
- This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
- others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
- or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and
- distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,
- provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
- included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
- document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
- the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
- Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing
- Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined
- in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to
- translate it into languages other than English.
-
- The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
- revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
-
- This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
- "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
- TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT
- NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN
- WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
- MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman & Myers Standards Track [Page 68]
-