=Solstice=

Renewable Energy: A New National Outlook?

Updated July 19, 1996
by Fred J. Sissine
Science Policy Research Division
Congressional Research Service

CONTENTS

Summary

The federal renew¼able energy program includes R&D funding, tax credits, and a regulatory framework ensuring utility purchases of electricity from independent renewable power producers. In constant 1996 dollars, DOE's renewable energy R&D (excluding electric energy and storage) funding declined 91%, from $1.3 billion in FY1979 to $132 million in FY1990. Real spending ($1996) rose steadily thereafter, reaching $340 million for FY1995, but 73% below the FY1979 peak.

The spending history for DOE renewable energy R&D can be viewed within the context of DOE spending for the three other energy R&D programs: nuclear, fossil, and energy efficiency R&D. From FY1948 through FY1972, the federal government spent about $21 billion ($1996 constant) for nuclear (fission and fusion) energy R&D and about $5 billion for fossil energy R&D. From FY1973 through FY1995, the federal government spent $41 billion for nuclear, $20 billion for fossil, $10 billion for renewables, and $6 billion for energy efficiency. Total spending from FY1948⌐FY1995 reached $103 billion, including $62 billion or 60% for nuclear (fission and fusion), $25 billion or 24% for fossil, $10 billion or 10% for renewables, and $6 billion or 6% for energy efficiency.

The passage of the Energy Policy Act (EPACT, P.L. 102⌐486) and a priority commitment to renewables by the Clinton Administration raised the spending levels for FY1994 and FY1995. The Administrati¡on's FY1996 DOE budget request reflected this priority by seeking $372 million, a $28 million increase primarily for export promotion and pollution prevention. Stressing budget deficit concerns, the 104th Congress soundly rejected this bid. The FY1996 appropriation of $254 million is about $77 million or 23% lower than the FY1995 mark.

The FY1997 DOE Budget Request (excluding electric/storage and energy management) seeks $327 million, a $73 million or 22% increase over the FY1996 mark. The Request includes $27 million more for biofuels, $25 million more for photovoltaics, and $18 million more for wind.

The House Appropriations Committee recommends $202 million for DOE's Renewable Energy program (close to the $191 million in the House Budget Resolution). This would be $52 million or 20% lower than the FY1996 level and it is $125 million or 38% lower than the Administration Request. The House mark would cut wind spending by $26 million and photovoltaics by $6 million while terminating deployment and in-house energy management. The Senate Appropriations Committee recommends $215 million, which is about $12 million or 6% higher than the House mark. Relative to the House mark, it increases wind by $9 million, but it would terminate the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and cuts hydrogen by $6 million.

Combining the 23% cut in FY1996 with the House Appropriations Committee recommended 20% cut for FY1997 would reduce the Program to about half (in real terms) its FY1995 capability. If continued, this downsizing trend would bring the Program to an end in FY1999.

A Presidential veto is possible and efforts are underway in both chambers to raise the FY1997 Appropriations Committees' marks in floor action. Floor action to reduce spending further is also possible.

This report is available at ftp://www.crest.org/pub/policy-and-econ/pending-legislation/crs2.txt


Maintained by CREST,
Comments and questions to:
www-content@solst\ ice.crest.org

The Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology
Project of the Solar Energy Research and Education Foundation
URL: http//solstice.crest.org/ policy-and-econ/ crs/ re/crs2.html