| |
12.02.1999
 Kdo l₧e?
(Ivan Vesel²)
Nemam zadneho duvodu pochybovat o tom, ze co James Luko pise o Srebrenici, je pravda. Luko je puvodem Madar z Vojvodiny. Ti nejsou a priori Srbum prilis pratelsky nakloneni. Lze z toho videt jak daleko ta proti-srbska propaganda v novinach zasla, kdyz to bylo i na neho moc. Luko studoval Jugoslavii a prava pred tim, nez byl do Jugoslavie za Kanadu vyslan.
Nevim jaky mel motiv, aby si vymyslel. Bosensti Srbove ho dokonce varovali, aby nevstupoval na jejich uzemi, protoze ho povazovali za proti-srbskeho. On totiz dokumentoval zlociny, kdyz byly skutecne spachany, a nektere z nich byly skutecne spachany Srby (ale ne Milosevicem nebo Karadzicem). O tom, ze Moslemove strileli na svoje vlastni pozice, kdyz se jim to z propagandistickych duvodu hodilo neni pochyb.
General Charles G. Boyd napsal: "...no seasoned observer in Sarajevo doubts for a moment that Muslim forces have found it in their interest to shell friendly targets." [Charles G. Boyd: Making Peace with the Guilty (The Truth about Bosnia), Foreign Affairs, September/October 1995, p. 28] (..zadny zkuseny pozorovatel v Sarajaevu nepochybuje ani na okamzik, ze muslimske sily shledaly, ze je v jejich zajmu strilet na pratelske cile.)
To rekl i kanadsky general McKenzie. Toho se snazili zdiskreditovat a obvinili ho ze znasilneni. OSN ho ze Sarajeva odvolalo kvuli nejake zamince, ale jeho vyroky nepoprelo.
O bobardovani trhu v Sarajevu 5. unora 1994 David Owen napsal: äa senior ballistic expert in Zagreb had studied a map of likely trajectory patterns produced by UN investigators in Sarajevo and believed the angle at which the mortar had hit the roof of the market stall indicated that the firing point was more likely to be 1,100-2,000 meters from the impact than 2,000-3,000 meters, and that this would tend to indicate that the mortar had been fired from a Bosnian army position. When this highly charged information reached the UN in New York on Tuesday everything was done to clamp down on the number of people who saw it so as to reduce the chance of press leak." [David Owen: Balkan Odyssey, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1995, p. 260]. (Zkuseny balisticky expert v Sarajevu studoval mapu pravdepodobnych trajektorii, ke kterym dospeli vysetrovatele OSN v Sarajevu a dospel k zaveru, ze uhel, pod kterym strela zasahla strechu budovy trhu, indikoval, ze bod vystrelu byl spise 1100-1200 od mista dopadu nez 2000-3000 metru a ze toho by vyplyvalo, ze strela byla vystrelena z pozic bosenske armady. Kdyz tato velmi zavazna zprava dosla v utery do OSN v New Yorku, bylo udelano vsechno proto, aby se zuzil pocet lidi, kteri to videli, aby se tak zabranilo uniku do tisku.)
Nakonec i Kofi Annan pripustil, ze zprava o bombardovani byla utajnena. Myslel jsem, ze toto dneska kazdy vi. Nevedel jsem, ze to tady budu muset po lopate prezentovat
James Luko napsal: "Regarding the last Markale massacre bombing in Sarajevo which prompted the US led NATO bombing campaign- the final conclusion of the report was that 6 French investigators believed the shell came from the Muslim side- those investigators were then sent off the case and the new investigators concluded that the shell came from a general direction where either Muslims or Serbs could have fired the shell. At first there were suggestions that the attack was from a RPG- Rocket propelled grenade- but crater analysis proved otherwise- you should know however that the previous Sarajevo market bombing was indeed concluded- by the UN- to be the result of a local RPG and not a shell as commonly believed." (Co se tyce bomboveho masakru v Markale, ktere podnitilo bombardovani NATO - vysledek vysetrovani byl, ze 6 franzouskych vysetrovatelu doslo k zaveru, ze strela prisla z muslimske strany - tech 6 vysetrovatelu pak bylo odvolano a novi vysetrovatele dosli k zaveru, ze strelu mohli vystrelit jak Muslimove tak Srbove. Nejprve se objevil nazor, ze utok byl z raketoveho granatu, ale analyza krateru ukazala opak - meli byste ale vedet, ze o predchozim bombardovani trhu v Sarajevu OSN doslo vskutku k zaveru, ze to byl vysledek lokalniho raketoveho granatu a nikoliv strely z dela, jak se vseobecne veri.) [Raketovy granat znamena, ze jej tezko mohli vypalit Srbove.]
O tech sesti odvolanych franzouskych vystetrovatelich Luko napsal, ze nevi kdo "pulled the strings". No my ale vime, kdo tehdy v OSN ucinkoval - nikdo jiny nez pritelkyne Vaclava Havla a budouci prezidentka Ceske republiky proslula svym vyrokem äMy mind-set is Munich".
Vsichni tito ctyri lide v Bosne skutecne byli na rozdil od novinovych redakci, ketere dostavaly "zpravy" od Ruder-Finna, ktery je mel rovnou od Ustasovcu v Zagrebu. Byl to skutecny medialni atentat, jenomze ne proti jednotlivci, ale celmu narodu.
Proc se tady o tom rozepisuji? Protoze to svedci o tom, ze tech 45 tel v Racaku bylo Albanci naaranzovano. Kdykoliv Muslimove v Bosne s necim takovym prisli, tak se jim podarilo vyvolat vlnu proti-srbske hysterie, tak proc by to nezkusili zase znovu? Mne se to zda dosti pruhledne. Ale najednou na Vas pan Kovanic vybafne s takovym nesmyslem, ze nevite, s ktereho mesice spadl.
Luko dale napsal: "the American bombing commenced "before" a complete UN investigation and the bombing was based on an original investigation that came from the American Embassy in Sarajevo."
(americke bombardovani zacalo "pred" kompletnim vysetrenim OSN a bombardovani bylo zalozano na puvodnim vysetrovani, ktere prislo z Americkeho velvyslanectvi v Sarajevu) Je to podobne "vysetrovani" pana Walkera v Racaku nebo Cervonenka v Praze.
O tom jak bylo zpravodajsvi v Americkych mediich prekroucene svedci tez tento citat z Davida Owena: äMeanwhile in the US the VOPP was coming under further ill informed attack. Time magazine printed a big piece with the sub-headline æMilosevic should be pleased. The WestÆs plan will reward his aggression by giving him almost everything he wants.Æ Disgracefully, the accompanying map bore so little relation to ours that it was unrecognizable. I tried to counter these stories and there was question-and-answer piece in Newsweek under the heading æWeÆve reached the crunchÆ, but the formidable disinformation machine that was operating in the US swamped our small press office in Geneva and we began on public relations grounds alone to think we would do better if we were physically in New York." [Owen, p.100] (Mezitim v USA se Vance-Owen Peace Plan dostal pod neinformovany utok. Time publikoval velky clanek s podtitulkem æMilosevic by mel byt spokojen. Zapadni plan odmeni jeho agresi a da mu skoro vsechno, co si preje.Æ Prilozena mapa mela tak malo spolecneho s nasi, ze jsme ji nemohli rozpoznat. Snazil jsem kontradikovat tyto historky a v Newsweeku byl program otazek a odpovedi pod jmenem æDospeli jsme ke kriziÆ, ale ta mohutna disinformacni masinerie, ktera se rozjela v USA, zaplavila nasi malou tiskovou kancelar v Zeneve a zacali jsme si myslet, ze z hlediska verejnych vztahu bychom radeji meli byt v New Yorku.") Pritom Milosevic, kteremu pan Kovanic spila do hajzlu, Hitleru a Saddamu, Vance-Owen peace plan podporoval, stejne jako ty ctyri ostatni mirove plany, ktere se pred Daytonem objevily.
Pan Kovanic nam ve svem poslednim clanku sdelil: "omezovßnφm lidskΘ svobody, st°φlenφm do neozbrojen²ch lidφ, koncentrßky a masov²mi hroby", "srbsk²m ozbrojenc∙m nic jin²ho, ne₧ vyvra₧dit ty, co se jim nepoda°ilo ut²ct, jo?", "zastßnci panstvφ B∞lehradu nad ostatnφmi mΘn∞cenn²mi pronßrody mluvφ jako Hitler!" atd. To uz jsme slyseli v televizi tisickrat. Nevim proc pan Kovanic povazoval za nutne to zopakovat jeste jednou. Jsou to lzi a prekrouceniny, v nejlepsim pripade selektivni rozhorceni. Pan Kovanic se nejak nezminuje o srbskych detech, ktere pomrzly po vyhnani z uzemi chraneneho OSN, Krajiny. Nezminuje se jak Srbove trpeli pod embargem, ktere bylo na Jugoslavii uvaleno po tzv. breadline massacre, coz byl taky pripad, kdy Muslimove strelili do svych civilistu a obvinili z toho Srby. O tom psal cesky Srb Rajko Dolecek ve "War and Propaganda". Doporucuji k precteni.(815-964-5053) Srbove trpeli v teto valce nejvic.
Kdyz je pan Kovanic konfrontovan s fakty, tak misto aby dostal hystericky zachvat, mel by si priznat, ze na tu propagandu v televizi naletel a ze se nevedomky stal nastrojem tech, kteri ho zmanipulovali, a ze to byl prave on, kdo svym stvanim k utrpeni na Balkane prispival.
|
|
