Synaspismos considers that the outcome of
the Amsterdam Treaty falls short of the needs of the citizens of Europe as well as of the
demands of our times. There are, of course, steps for the improvement of the Maastricht
Treaty in specific areas, especially in the civic rights chapter, but these improvements,
judged as a whole, are marginal and difficult to distinguish for the Citizens of Europe.
On the other hand, the postponement of decisions which would set a course towards a
democratic and social turn in the route of the European Union is both visible and
significant.
The retention of the Community budget at an
unacceptably low level, the delay in the institutional reforms, the non-existence of a
common foreign and security policy, the inadequate steps that were taken at the Luxembourg
Summit on employment, the inability to balance the Central European Bank with an economic
government of the European Union, are the basic elements which serve to substantiate the
above conclusion.
While the Single European Act and the
Maastricht Treaty, in spite of the great problems of the latter which we pointed out from
the beginning, constituted a step in the developmental process of the European Union, the
Amsterdam Treaty does not share this characteristic. This reason, together with the
oncoming enlargement, renders imperative the fastest possible revision of the Amsterdam
Treaty and the relevant thoughts have already started.
At a time when EuropeÆs large social and
democratic deficits demanded a revision for ômore Europeö the Amsterdam Treaty
registered stagnation. Without subscribing to the voices that prophesize doom, without
accepting the defeatist and dead end view that the road to the European integration has
closed, because we believe firmly in this prospect and want to renew the faith of the
European working people and citizens to the European vision, we cannot approve the results
of the Treaty.
It is on these grounds that the Synaspismos
Congress decides that during the discussion in the Greek Parliament the partyÆs position
be expressed with the vote ôpresentö.
This decision includes the following four components:
1.
Synaspismos insists firmly on its European orientation and struggles so that the future of
the necessary European integration carries the seal of a ôLeft Europeanismö and its
ideas.
2.
Synaspismos will struggle together with other forces for the radical revision of the
Amsterdam Treaty
3.
Synaspismos proposes the non-ratification of a treaty which failed to realise the
necessary social and democratic turn in Europe.
4.
Synaspismos will vote ôpresentö in Parliament in order to register its reservations
and its position for non-ratification of the specific Treaty. The political grounds on
which this decision was reached will be contained in a statement that Synaspismos will
submit to Parliament.
These political grounds express our will to
be present and active in the coming developments. It summarises our decision to reject
both passive attitudes and concepts about impasses which end by undermining the route
towards a united, federal and socially just Europe as well as strategies of reverting to
national isolation by the cultivation of dead end anti- European stances.
Synaspismos thinks that it is impossible to
undertake any European action without the necessary funds. The 1,27% of the European GNP
is absolutely insufficient. We ask that the European UnionÆs funds be increased through
a 2,5% reduction in the military expenses of each member û country. These amounts should
be used solely for the fight against unemployment and for development. On this basis it is
possible to create a very strong mass movement inspired by the best traditions of the Left
and the labour movement. If this target is attained it would mean a redoubling of the
EUÆ s ôown fundsö. It is thus that the social Europe will meet with the Europe of
peace and its message to the other people of our planet will be revitalised.
The Congress authorises the Central
Political Committee of Synaspismos and its Members at the European Parliament to convey
this specific proposal to the Greek government and the European Parliament and decides to
promote it with every means possible and available in order to create a broad movement of
support.