[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Anyone been successful at running The new Dark Castle on Executor???
>>>>> "Trev" == Trev <trevoreb@sfo.com> writes:
In article <31c16791.2046532@news.alt.net> trevoreb@sfo.com (Trev) writes:
>> I took a quick look at Dark Castle under the debugger last
>> night. I don't think it's likely to go by the time E2 ships.
>> It did point out a few things that we might fix between now and
>> then, but even with a few simple fixes made there were still
>> problems.
>>
Trev> Thanks for looking in to it. Glad it was helpful in some
Trev> way though I suppose you have a few files like this. Have
Trev> you gotten to the point yet where a list of what doesn't
Trev> work would be shorter then a list of what does?
It all depends on what you count as an application. My guess is that
if you were to list all the freeware, demoware and shareware that is
out there that more than half of it does run under Executor, but when
you weight it by which apps are used the most, Executor probably falls
short since you get things like Word 5.x working but Word 6 not,
etc. (slightly bad choice since most Mac Word users probably prefer
5.x, but hopefully you get the point).
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com
References: