[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Why a Windows 95 version?



At 12:17 PM 22/6/95 -0400, you wrote:
>I, for one, would much rather see a version running under an established OS
>with a proven track record (like OS/2 or even Windows 3.x) than a Windows 95
>version, since I don't see my workplace switching to Win/95 for a year or
>more, and I likely won't use it at home at all.
> 
I would love a win95 version. What I've seen from running win95 for the last
month or two has convinced me to switch. It's a neat and good system. The
E/d version runs (mostly) under it.

Win95 is looking pretty solid already, and certainly seems robust.
...
Mike Jackson