[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Printing on E/L
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Halverson <jeff@umn.edu> writes:
Jeff> Hello, Does anyone get decent printouts from E/L? I think I
Jeff> might not really be= =20 set up right for it, either that or
Jeff> E/L doesn't do the right thing. (I=20 tend to think it may
Jeff> just be my problem, though)...
...
Jeff> It actually is the latest version (1.99o E/L). Let me know
Jeff> if it works on your setup in house... oh, and thanks for
Jeff> telling me about my mailer-- I guess I'll have to find out
Jeff> how to not get it to send as "Quoted Printable"..
Ack. You're right, it looks pretty bad. A quick glance at the output
shows these bugs:
weird word placement and line breaking (suggesting that there
is a problem measuring the text, and that it's *not* purely a
font substitution problem)
improperly placed graphics in "pictures" in the document (e.g.
the Tex-Edit icon on the first page, the overstriking in the
table of contents)
the last portion of the manual isn't printed out
I believe that those three bugs explain all the badness in the
Tex-Edit Reference Executor printed output. I'll look into them fairly
soon. Different programs may have other bugs. I think Word output
prints fairly well if you have fractional widths enabled.
--Cliff
ctm@ardi.com