[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Executor usefulness?



In article <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu>, chenhh@cs.purdue.edu` says...
>
>Does anybody else question the usefulness of Executor?  I like
>macintoshes but have a PC and have used Executor, but I balk at
>buying it because I never actually use a macintosh for any of my
>important tasks these days.  There was a time that I liked Macs
>better for word processing, but these days, I'd rather use windows
>programs because they are native to my machine (and thus faster).
>
>Also, Macs are moving to PowerPC these days... is Executor planning
>on emulating that in the future?
>
>This might sound pretty critical, but I tend to find that most of the
>things I end up running are my old Mac shareware games.
>
>Is there a major flaw in my line of reasoning?
>
>-Howard Chen
>chenhh@cs.purdue.edu
>
>P.S.: I do like Executor and it is very impressive despite my criticisms

	Nothing wrong with your reasoning. I bought executor for three basic 
reasons. 1st)Whenever I see a company like ARDI comming out with something so 
"cool" I like to support them. 2)I like to play around with my old MAC games. 
and 3)It gives me some extra compatibilty with my friends who use MAC's.

Joe



References: