[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: DOS vs 95
On Thu, 07 Mar 1996 09:44:41 -0500 (EST), NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED
<DECLARKG@DEPAUW.EDU> wrote:
>
> I have heard many many people saying that E/D runs faster under
>DOS than under Windows 95... I have no idea why, but the exact opposite
>is true for me. Under DOS, the emulator runs annoyingly slowly, but under
>Windows 95, it's actually quantifiably faster than the Mac IIsi I am using\
>to type in this message.\
>
> Perhaps it's the way Windows 95 is set up to run E/D, or my system
>specs, but I have notably better performance under 95 than under DOS.
>If anyone would like, I could post or send benchmark info.
>
I don't think mine is faster in WIN95, I would say they are about the
same. I think that most of peoples problems with Executor or other DOS
programs (when run in windows) is that they need more RAM. On my
486DX2-66 with 8 megs everything was slower in WIN95. On my P90 with
16 megs there really is NO difference. I know it is faster than my
friends Perfoma 550 with 5 megs.
References:
- Re: DOS vs 95
- From: NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED <DECLARKG@DEPAUW.EDU>