[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: netatalk-style resource forks? (please? :)



> Of course, CAP aufs uses .resource directories, Helios EtherShare and IPT
> uShare use .rsrc directories, Xinet KA-Share uses .HSResource directories, and
> Pacer PacerShare uses afp_resource directories.
> 
> There are corresponding differences for desktop representation.  Many of these
> systems also appear to have files or directories for storing finder
> information.  Fun, eh?

	I'm not sure what DEC Pathworks does.

	Who do we shoot for causing such a massive divergence?  At least some
of these people had to be aware of the other efforts, and could have made
their own work compatible.  Gratuitous difference sucks.


References: