[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Executor 2beta0 runs faster?



According to the benchmark program included with Executor 1.99q/2.0b0, 
Executor v2 beta 0 runs just under four times as fast as Executor 1.99q.  
However, most of you report slower performance with v2 beta 0. Can 
someone explain why.

My system configuration:

AMD 486DX2-80 w/ 128K cache
20M RAM
ATI Mach32 VESA Local-bus video

Windows 95
Univbe 5.1

And I'm running Executor (both 1.99q/2beta0) under Windows 95 DOS prompt.

:->
Rick

PS. don't hit reply, instead send your reply to rick.ho@utoronto.ca


Follow-Ups: