AR-NEWS Digest 469

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) New weapon in the war against super bugs
     by Andrew Gach 
  2) (US) Fishing Ban Urged for Walden Pond
     by allen schubert 
  3) (US) Swine Disease Still a Mystery
     by allen schubert 
  4) (TW) Taiwan pork industry reels as Japan continues import ban
     by Vadivu Govind 
  5) Primates: July-August - Laboratory Awareness Actions
     by baerwolf@tiac.net (baerwolf)
  6) Correcting a correction...
     by Daniel Paulo Martins Ferreira 
  7) RE: Primates: July-August - Laboratory Awareness Actions
     by "D'Amico, AnnMarie" 
  8) Monkey Business
     by Sean Thomas 
  9) Monkey Business
     by Sean Thomas 
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 21:00:31 -0700
From: Andrew Gach 
To: ar-news@envirolink.org
Subject: New weapon in the war against super bugs
Message-ID: <33CEEA5F.3F6D@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Scientists use gene engineering to create new antibiotics

Scripps Howard 

(July 17, 1997 7:45 p.m. EDT) - Researchers looking for novel ways to
fight drug-resistant bacteria have a new weapon, thanks to a bit of
genetic subterfuge. Scientists at Stanford University report Friday in
the journal Science that they have successfully used genetically
engineered enzymes to produce new types of molecules that work as
antibiotics, immuno-suppressants and anti-cancer drugs.

Because bacteria can alter their own genes to resist antibiotics, the
new line of drugs are built with a genetic mutation so early along the
molecular assembly line that the bacteria can't catch up.

Using strep cells, Stanford postdoctoral fellow John Jacobsen found a
way to manipulate the first step in a lengthy chain reaction used to
form more and more complex molecules, actually blocking the chain after
the first step. That stalled the natural assembly line of the cell.

Then the researchers add a synthetic compound and restart the process,
eventually producing a variety of antibiotic molecules that are unlike
anything in nature, and thus harder for bacteria to defeat.

Chaitan Khosla, a Stanford associate professor of chemical engineering,
had feared that the cells might not resume production with the
artificial materials, but they seem to respond well. "We've been
pleasantly surprised by how tolerant the entire system appears to be
toward unnatural (building blocks). The overall process seems to work
remarkably well," he said.

Although the technique remains cumbersome, the ability to produce new
antibiotic compounds in this shotgun fashion offers drug researchers the
opportunity to create hundreds of potentially useful molecules for each
one they have already created.

While drugs based on the new technique may be a decade or more away from
pharmacies, Khosla suggests that if chemists can assemble a library of
thousands of synthetic molecules that can be inserted and grown in this
fashion, they could offer a much larger array of drug candidates.

By LEE BOWMAN, Scripps Howard News Service

=================================================================

The unwise use of anti-biotics, a potent "weapon" in the war against
pathogens led to the rise of drug-resistent strains.

Will the newest "weapon" be more auspicious?

Andy
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 19:25:51 -0400
From: allen schubert 
To: ar-news@envirolink.org
Subject: (US) Fishing Ban Urged for Walden Pond
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970718192548.006e5c70@clark.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Part of a PeTA campaign.........
from AP Wire page:
-----------------------------------
 07/18/1997 02:39 EST

 Fishing Ban Urged for Walden Pond

 By ROBIN ESTRIN
 Associated Press Writer

 CONCORD, Mass. (AP) -- The peaceful woods and clear waters lure Joseph
 Sevigny, with his fishing poles and 12-foot boat, to Walden Pond dozens
 of times a year. He tosses back the bass, but the trout often become
 dinner.

 It's a relaxing ritual enjoyed by countless others at the watering hole
 made famous by transcendentalist writer Henry David Thoreau, an angler
 himself.

 But a campaign is on to reel in the fishermen. The People for the Ethical
 Treatment of Animals have petitioned the state to ban fishing at Walden
 as part of the group's new anti-fishing crusade.

 Even though Thoreau fished on the 60-acre pond, PETA folks say the animal
 lover would have supported the ban.

 ``I cannot fish without falling a little in self-respect,'' Thoreau wrote
 in ``Walden,'' published in 1854.

 For years, the international animal rights group has fought against
 fishing, arguing that fish feel pain and suffer greatly after being
 caught.

 ``Just imagine swimming through the water and all they see is the bait,''
 said Dawn Carr, the coordinator of the campaign. ``By the time they see
 the hook, it's too late. They've already impaled themselves.''

 The organization, which has 500,000 members worldwide and 16,000 in
 Massachusetts, plans to ask parks across America to ban fishing. But the
 campaign is being spawned here at Walden, where the conservation movement
 began with Thoreau nearly 150 years ago.

 ``I really think the PETA people are wacky,'' said Sevigny, 50, of
 Melrose.

 The pond, 16 miles northwest of Boston, and its surrounding woods were
 given to the state in 1922. Today, an estimated 500,000 people a year
 swim, fish, picnic and hike here.

 State environmental officials said they have no intention of banning
 fishing there. The deed to Walden Pond clearly spells out that fishing
 will be allowed, said Susan Hamilton, a spokeswoman for the Department of
 Environmental Management.

 PETA appealed last week to Gov. William F. Weld, himself an angler,
 asking him to step in and institute a ban. PETA insists that Thoreau
 would have wanted the pond he so loved to be a sanctuary for all
 wildlife.

 Thoreau did have a respect for all living creatures, said Tom Blanding, a
 Thoreau scholar and Concord resident.

 ``But for them to represent this as an absolute attitude on his part is
 to take things out of the literary context,'' Blanding said. ``To adopt
 him as an advocate for their position perhaps is out of proportion in a
 way.''

 The very notion of a fishing ban was enough to make one Walden fisherman
 flounder for words to equal his contempt.

 ``Why don't they ban walking here?'' shouted the man, who wouldn't give
 his name but said he has been fishing on Walden for all of his 70 years.
 ``They might as well ban swimming.''

Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 19:36:56 -0400
From: allen schubert 
To: ar-news@envirolink.org
Subject: (US) Swine Disease Still a Mystery
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970718193653.006f3af4@clark.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

from AP Wire page:
------------------------------------
 07/18/1997 02:10 EST

 Swine Disease Still a Mystery

 By TOM SEERY
 Associated Press Writer

 DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- An outbreak of swine disease last year that
 began killing sows and causing them to abort their fetuses still puzzles
 scientists.

 ``I'm not sure we would have anything you would call definitive,'' said
 Larry White, senior staff veterinarian for the Agriculture Department's
 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service in Fort Collins, Colo., which
 is coordinating a nationwide study of the disease.

 Reports of the disease last December prompted quick action by government
 and pork industry officials. More than 40 experts met in January to map
 out the research effort.

 Researchers believe the sows were stricken with a form of ``porcine
 reproductive and respiratory syndrome.'' But the sows had been vaccinated
 for the disease, and some of their symptoms appeared to be more severe
 than previously seen in that syndrome.

 Researchers say an ``acute PRRS'' virus could be causing the latest
 outbreak.

 The outbreak, although not widespread, has caused anxiety in the pork
 industry. As hog-raising shifts from small, family-run farms to large,
 factory-style operations where thousands of hogs are housed in
 confinement buildings, disease control has become increasingly important.

 Farmers are being advised to be patient while the investigation
 continues.

 ``We haven't been able to draw any conclusions about any changes they
 should make,'' White said.

 Veterinary laboratories in seven states are working with the USDA to find
 and study cases of the puzzling disease.

 When an outbreak is identified, researchers go to the farm, take samples
 from the animals and get information about vaccinations, genetic makeup
 of hogs and other factors.

 The researchers also try to identify nearby farms without the disease,
 and look for factors that might explain the isolated outbreak.

 The USDA is studying cases at laboratories in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
 Nebraska, Minnesota, North Carolina and South Dakota. Officials hope to
 do an intensive study of 44 farms with the outbreak and nearby farms that
 do not have the disease.

 ``The original goal was to try to have some summary information available
 by this fall,'' said Kevin Petersburg, a USDA veterinarian working on the
 case in Iowa.

 ``It would be safe to say that the general consensus is that it appears
 to be PRRS,'' he said. ``It may be that we'll find out that there are
 some management factors that play a role in allowing some farms to have
 the acute PRRS outbreak.''

 In Iowa, an outbreak occurred in about 10 herds in the southeast part of
 the state. Officials have not identified farms where the outbreak
 occurred, and say there is no evidence that the disease is spreading
 rapidly.

 ``It's my perception that things have kind of quieted down, based on the
 number of case reports we're getting,'' said Tom Burkgren, a Perry, Iowa,
 veterinarian who is executive director of the American Association of
 Swine Practitioners, a veterinary group working with researchers on the
 outbreak.

 Jim Koch, president of the Iowa Pork Producers Association, said that
 although the ``acute PRRS'' outbreak appears to have stabilized in Iowa,
 common forms of PRRS continue to hit farms.

 ``It can go away and haunt you again,'' Koch said. ``It started out as a
 mystery swine disease and remains a mystery swine disease.''

Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 23:01:23 +0800 (SST)
From: Vadivu Govind 
To: ar-news@envirolink.org
Subject: (TW) Taiwan pork industry reels as Japan continues import ban
Message-ID: <199707181501.XAA13093@eastgate.cyberway.com.sg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



>CNA Daily English News Wire

TAIWAN PORK INDUSTRY REELS AS JAPAN CONTINUES IMPORT BAN 


Taipei, July 17 (CNA) Taiwan stands to lose NT$300 million (US$10.79
million) in export sales owing to Japan's recent refusal to resume import of
Taiwan processed pork, the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) said Thursday. 

Taiwan hog farmers had hoped that after the outbreak of foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD) was brought under control, Taiwan pork exports to Japan would
be allowed to resume. Before Taiwan was declared an FMD-affected area in
March, Japan was the largest importer of Taiwan pork. 

But hog farmer's hopes were dashed by Japan's recent announcement that more
time is needed to evaluate the situation before the sale of Taiwan pork can
resume. 

Local hog farmers have charged Japan with discriminating against Taiwan
pork, with many pointing to Japan's treatment of pork products from mainland
China. Even though the mainland has also been declared an FMD-affected area,
Japan still accepts pork from provinces with no reported cases of FMD. 

IDB officials said the FMD outbreak has taken a heavy toll on Taiwan's hog
industry. Although the government has provided NT$3.16 billion (US$113.26
million) in loans to help bail out six local firms that process frozen pork,
the IDB believes the best solution to the industry's woes would be to
resume exports. 

Taiwan exported NT$42 billion (US$1.51 billion) worth of frozen pork to
Japan in 1996, which included NT$300 million (US$10.79 million) worth of
processed pork. (By Lilian Wu) 

Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 12:17:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: baerwolf@tiac.net (baerwolf)
To: Veg-Boston@waste.org, ar-news@envirolink.org, veg-ne@empire.net
Cc: kvc@OpenMarket.com, hturrisi@tiac.net, hrones@husc.harvard.edu,
        veggie@envirolink.org, mkbrodie@vgernet.net, MINOUADAMS@aol.com,
        Lucy_Tancredi@factset.com, Me1ani@aol.com
Subject: Primates: July-August - Laboratory Awareness Actions
Message-ID: <199707181617.MAA24728@mailrelay.tiac.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Please join the move to focus attention on the plight of primates in 
laboratories and the increasing public sentiment to "Let These Children Go."

The culmanation of this public educational experience will be the 
9 day peaceful demonstration Aug 2 to Aug 10 at the NERPC in Southboro,MA
led by national activist Rick Bogle, and the promotion of the populace's demand 
for the upcoming ordinance in Cambridge, MA which shall recognize
 the right of primates to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.  

July 7 (Mon)- till Oct   - Tabling to Educate about Primates
Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA 6:00pm till --->.
Air video tapes, hand out literature, educate the public to how we can end
the torture 
of primates in laboratories. Help promote passage of an ordinance in Cambridge 
to recognize the right of primates to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Happiness.
Call Bill 617-625-1451 or Steve 508-393-5339 for meeting location and times.


July 15, 16, 17 (Tue, Wed, Thur) - Write-a-thon for Primates
>From your house, your office, create the following types of letters: 
1) Sample letters for people to sign and send to the NIH, Southboro and
other primate labs,
2) Newspaper Op-Ed pieces against primates in labs, and 
3) Sample letters for people to sign/send to legislators, 
regarding public dissaproval of the injustices enacted upon primates in
laboratories.
Call Steve at 508-393-5339 for info & details, or email baerwolf@tiac.net

July 19 (Sat)-July 29 (Tue) - Distribute "Primates in Labs"  Flyers/Sample
Letters in Malls ,
 and other public places. Call Steve at 508-393-5339 for hand-outs and
location coordination.

July 23 & July 30 (Weds) - Vigil outside of Harvard Medical School
Harvard Medical School, Longwood Ave, Boston near the 
Brigham & Woman's Hospital. 3:00pm - 6:00pm
For more info call Bill at 617-625-1451 or Steve at 617-478-7731

Aug 1 (Fri) - Informational Tabling for Primate Freedom Campaign
In front of Au Bon Pain, Harvard Sq., Cambridge. 12pm - 5pm 
For more info call NEAVS at 617-523-6020

Aug 2 (Sat)-Aug 10 (Sun) - Informational Protest at New England Regional
Primate Center, 
1 Pine Hill Drive, Southboro, MA on the Marlboro line. About one mile south
of Rte 20.
Come for the day; come for the duration, as you please. 
Bring vegan food, water, necessities for non-stop demonstrators. 
Bring anti-vivisection posters, banners and flyers if you have any.   
Call Steve at 508-393-5339 or NEAVS at 617-523-6020 for info. 

Aug 2 (Sat)-Aug 10 (Sun) - Primate Center Demonstators' Potlucks
Join vegetarian organizations in providing food and water for activists. 
Three square meals & fluids are needed during the 9 day demonstration.
 Vegan food preparation, and  food pickup/delivery, 
and restaurant vegan donations requested.
Call Steve at 508-393-5339 by July 27 (Sunday night) for food coordination.

Aug 2 (Sat)-Aug 10 (Sun) - Informational Protests Against Primate Labs at
Harvard University 
Call Bill at 617-625-1451 or Steve at 508-393-5339 or NEAVS at 617-523-6020
to determine exact location, day, time, and content of each day's
demonstration. 

**Aug 8 (Fri) - Solidarity Vigil in front of New England Primate Research Center
Southboro, MA.  6:00pm - 8:00pm. Join activist Rick Bogle in a 
silent remembrance for primates suffering at the research center. 
For more info, or if you can provide a ride, or if you need a ride 
call NEAVS at 617-523-6020

Aug 16(Sat)-Nov 4(Tue) - Neighborhood Campaigning in Cambridge for the
Ordinance to Abolish Primate Exploitation and Slavery (Proposition A.P.E.S).
call Bill at 617-625-1451
or Steve at 508-393-5339 for literature and coordination. 


.......... Further, We could use some stimulating personalities to speak up
for primates 
in yet to be scheduled media (Newspaper, Radio and TV spots). 
Also do you know any media - savy  people? 
Respond to Steve at 508-393-5339 or Chris at 617-787-3125

sbaer
steven baer
 
baerwolf@tiac.net
Massachusetts

HOW DEEP INTO SPACE MUST HUMANS GO BEFORE THEY REALIZE 
ALL THE NEIGHBORS THEY'VE TORTURED ON PLANET EARTH. 

Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 17:42:13 +0000 (GMT)
From: Daniel Paulo Martins Ferreira 
To: Patrick Nolan 
Cc: ar-news@envirolink.org
Subject: Correcting a correction...
Message-ID: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Greetings.

A few days ago I corrected the name and the adress of the Minister of
Foreign Affairs of Portugal.

Well, I made a confusion and gave you another wrong adress. I'm 
sending you the real, confirmed, adress. I'm sorry for all the 
trouble.


  Hon. Jaime Gama
  Minister for Foreign Affairs
  Palacio das Necessidades  
  Largo do Rilvas
  1350 Lisboa
  PORTUGAL


Regards.

Daniel

Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:53:57 -0400
From: "D'Amico, AnnMarie" 
To: "Veg-Boston@waste.org" ,
        "ar-news@envirolink.org" ,
        "veg-ne@empire.net" ,
        "baerwolf@tiac.net"
      
Cc: "Lucy_Tancredi@factset.com" ,
        "Me1ani@aol.com" 
Subject: RE: Primates: July-August - Laboratory Awareness Actions
Message-ID: 

To all...

The postings on Primates in Canada and the US is extremely disturbing. 
 I've seen other articles from the NYTimes and other papers around the 
country.  Some have already been euthanized.  One of the Scientist on the 
board wants to euthanize.

What can we do to intervene?  Need some answers quickly.   This is going to 
be a horrific injustice.  From what I've read the government isn't acting 
quickly enough (what else is new) and that ultimately they will die at the 
hands of opportunists.

We need to do something now.  Any suggestions?  Please help.

TKS -- AM

----------
 From: baerwolf@tiac.net[SMTP:baerwolf@tiac.net]
 Sent: Friday, July 18, 1997 12:17 PM
 To: Veg-Boston@waste.org; ar-news@envirolink.org; veg-ne@empire.net
 Cc: kvc@OpenMarket.com; hturrisi@tiac.net; hrones@husc.harvard.edu; 
veggie@envirolink.org; mkbrodie@vgernet.net; MINOUADAMS@aol.com; 
Lucy_Tancredi@factset.com; Me1ani@aol.com
 Subject: Primates: July-August - Laboratory Awareness Actions

Please join the move to focus attention on the plight of primates in
laboratories and the increasing public sentiment to "Let These Children 
Go."

The culmanation of this public educational experience will be the
9 day peaceful demonstration Aug 2 to Aug 10 at the NERPC in Southboro,MA
led by national activist Rick Bogle, and the promotion of the populace's 
demand
for the upcoming ordinance in Cambridge, MA which shall recognize
 the right of primates to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

July 7 (Mon)- till Oct   - Tabling to Educate about Primates
Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA 6:00pm till --->.
Air video tapes, hand out literature, educate the public to how we can end
the torture
of primates in laboratories. Help promote passage of an ordinance in 
Cambridge
to recognize the right of primates to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Happiness.
Call Bill 617-625-1451 or Steve 508-393-5339 for meeting location and 
times.


July 15, 16, 17 (Tue, Wed, Thur) - Write-a-thon for Primates
>From your house, your office, create the following types of letters:
1) Sample letters for people to sign and send to the NIH, Southboro and
other primate labs,
2) Newspaper Op-Ed pieces against primates in labs, and
3) Sample letters for people to sign/send to legislators,
regarding public dissaproval of the injustices enacted upon primates in
laboratories.
Call Steve at 508-393-5339 for info & details, or email baerwolf@tiac.net

July 19 (Sat)-July 29 (Tue) - Distribute "Primates in Labs"  Flyers/Sample
Letters in Malls ,
 and other public places. Call Steve at 508-393-5339 for hand-outs and
location coordination.

July 23 & July 30 (Weds) - Vigil outside of Harvard Medical School
Harvard Medical School, Longwood Ave, Boston near the
Brigham & Woman's Hospital. 3:00pm - 6:00pm
For more info call Bill at 617-625-1451 or Steve at 617-478-7731

Aug 1 (Fri) - Informational Tabling for Primate Freedom Campaign
In front of Au Bon Pain, Harvard Sq., Cambridge. 12pm - 5pm
For more info call NEAVS at 617-523-6020

Aug 2 (Sat)-Aug 10 (Sun) - Informational Protest at New England Regional
Primate Center,
1 Pine Hill Drive, Southboro, MA on the Marlboro line. About one mile 
south
of Rte 20.
Come for the day; come for the duration, as you please.
Bring vegan food, water, necessities for non-stop demonstrators.
Bring anti-vivisection posters, banners and flyers if you have any.
Call Steve at 508-393-5339 or NEAVS at 617-523-6020 for info.

Aug 2 (Sat)-Aug 10 (Sun) - Primate Center Demonstators' Potlucks
Join vegetarian organizations in providing food and water for activists.
Three square meals & fluids are needed during the 9 day demonstration.
 Vegan food preparation, and  food pickup/delivery,
and restaurant vegan donations requested.
Call Steve at 508-393-5339 by July 27 (Sunday night) for food 
coordination.

Aug 2 (Sat)-Aug 10 (Sun) - Informational Protests Against Primate Labs at
Harvard University
Call Bill at 617-625-1451 or Steve at 508-393-5339 or NEAVS at 
617-523-6020
to determine exact location, day, time, and content of each day's
demonstration.

**Aug 8 (Fri) - Solidarity Vigil in front of New England Primate Research 
Center
Southboro, MA.  6:00pm - 8:00pm. Join activist Rick Bogle in a
silent remembrance for primates suffering at the research center.
For more info, or if you can provide a ride, or if you need a ride
call NEAVS at 617-523-6020

Aug 16(Sat)-Nov 4(Tue) - Neighborhood Campaigning in Cambridge for the
Ordinance to Abolish Primate Exploitation and Slavery (Proposition 
A.P.E.S).
call Bill at 617-625-1451
or Steve at 508-393-5339 for literature and coordination.


.......... Further, We could use some stimulating personalities to speak 
up
for primates
in yet to be scheduled media (Newspaper, Radio and TV spots).
Also do you know any media - savy  people?
Respond to Steve at 508-393-5339 or Chris at 617-787-3125

sbaer
steven baer

baerwolf@tiac.net
Massachusetts

HOW DEEP INTO SPACE MUST HUMANS GO BEFORE THEY REALIZE
ALL THE NEIGHBORS THEY'VE TORTURED ON PLANET EARTH.



Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:00:53 -0700
From: Sean Thomas 
To: ar-news@envirolink.com
Subject: Monkey Business
Message-ID: <33CFF5A5.15B1@sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------3C421FCD530C"

Sean Thomas, Co-Director 
Animal Action
Ottawa Citizen   Hit reload or refresh if you're not getting today's
Online           date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   [Image]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   [Image]

[Image]
[Image]
[Image]

National
Highlights
[Image]National
News
[Image]Across
Canada
[Image]News in
Depth
                  FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | BUSINESS | NATIONAL | WORLD
                                        | EDITORIALS
                    ENTERTAINMENT | YOUR MONEY | INTERNET | COLUMNISTS |
                                         CLASSIFIED

                 [National - Ottawa Citizen Online]

                                    Friday 18 July 1997

                 Health Canada considers private monkey business

                 Breeding mill would produce primates for profit

                 Randy Boswell
                 The Ottawa Citizen

                 The creation of a private, profit-making monkey mill for
                 government and industry research labs is among the
                 options available to Health Canada as it considers what
                 to do with its primate breeding colony of 750 long-tailed
                 macaques.

                 The idea, listed along with several other alternatives in
                 a report completed last month that examined Health
                 Canada's animal resources division, contrasts with a
                 recommendation issued Wednesday by an expert panel of
                 American scientists that has been considering the future
                 of that country's population of 1,500 research
                 chimpanzees.

                 The U.S. National Research Council, in a study sponsored
                 by the National Institutes of Health, urged a five-year
                 moratorium on chimpanzee breeding in the States because
                 an "oversupply has created substantial management
                 problems for the institutions that house them."

                 The U.S. panel also urged the establishment of
                 "sanctuaries" for chimps no longer needed for
                 experiments, and rejected the idea of killing unwanted
                 animals.

                 The future of the Ottawa monkeys, which have been used
                 since 1983 for research into environmental toxins and
                 AIDS and to test polio vaccines, will be the focus of a
                 study due in November from a panel of scientists and
                 philosophers named this week by the Royal Society of
                 Canada.

                 Health Canada requested the analysis as it faced the
                 fallout of massive federal budget cuts and changing
                 trends in animal research. The department has concluded
                 that, without some prospect of cost recovery, it can no
                 longer justify spending $1 million a year for the care
                 and maintenance of monkeys for which there is declining
                 need within Health Canada itself.

                 But one of the potential solutions to the predicament,
                 according to the June report, is to privatize the colony
                 through an employee takeover or direct sale to a private
                 firm.

                 Plans to "determine a market value for the monkey colony
                 as a commercial operation" are listed in the department's
                 recommendations.

                 Over the years, some of the monkeys have been sold to
                 outside agencies and universities, but on a modest scale.

                 "Several members of the pharmaceutical and testing
                 laboratory sectors felt that if they had access to
                 animals from the HPB (Health Protection Branch) colony,
                 more sophisticated (and lucrative) testing could be
                 conducted in Canada," the report stated.

                 It is the superior quality of the Health Canada monkey
                 colony, for research purposes, that makes potential
                 commercialization attractive -- even in an era when
                 public campaigns against the use of laboratory primates
                 have driven many researchers toward using rodents or
                 high-tech alternatives to animals for their experiments.

                 The Ottawa colony's "unique nature and irreplaceability,"
                 as the Health Canada report describes it, derives from
                 the fact that the genetic history of the monkeys is known
                 for two generations and that they are free of the herpes
                 virus that infects much of the North American primate
                 research stock.

                 In 1991, a veterinarian at the Texas Primate Centre
                 contracted a rare monkey herpes virus and died; a Health
                 Canada scientist died in 1958 after he was bitten by an
                 infected animal.

                 The macaque or Cynomolgus monkey is also in greater
                 demand than the widely available rhesus monkey because
                 "cynos" are smaller and thus easier to house and control.

                 "If made available to industry and universities on a
                 larger scale than in the past, the HPB monkey colony
                 could be an important element in the science and
                 technology infrastructure of Canada," it noted.
                 "Toxicological testing companies would have the ability
                 to attract more lucrative contracts, and this in turn
                 would contribute to the science base of the country with
                 a concomitant positive impact on Canadian
                 competitiveness."

                 About 800 macaques are used annually for product testing
                 in Canada, most purchased from primate suppliers in
                 Texas.

                 "The monkey colony in Ottawa is strategically located to
                 the supply of these animals to industry and institutions
                 located in Montreal and Toronto," says the report.
                 "Several companies have expressed that the HPB colony
                 would be their first choice supplier because of ease of
                 shipping, less traumatized animals ready for test much
                 sooner, and the fact that animals are of a much higher
                 quality."

                 Monkeys sell for between $1,000 and $4,000, depending on
                 their state of maturity, and monkeys in their
                 reproductive prime are the most expensive.

                 William Leiss, the Queen's University professor who
                 convened the expert panel on behalf of the Royal Society,
                 said Health Canada officials recognize "they could cover
                 their costs" by stepping up sales of monkeys. But he says
                 the department turned to the expert panel partly because
                 it is searching for better alternatives.

                 "They don't want to do it," he said, but acknowledged
                 that the panel could conclude that increased revenues
                 from marketing of the monkeys would benefit taxpayers and
                 help Canada maintain a valuable research resource.

                 Stephanie Brown, an animal rights activist with the
                 Canadian Federation of Humane Societies, warned that
                 "trying to make a buck means producing a lot of animals"
                 and risking the same kind of "glut" that appears to have
                 developed in the U.S. market for chimpanzees.

                 Ms. Brown, who recently sat on a Health Canada advisory
                 committee examining the future of its animal resources
                 division, slammed the notion of "approaching the future
                 of the colony as an entrepreneur."

                 Dr. Jim Wong, chief veterinarian with the Canadian
                 Council on Animal Care and the man responsible for
                 inspecting the living conditions of Health Canada's
                 monkey colony, said the expert panelists -- and
                 ultimately federal officials -- face an excruciating
                 choice because of the financial pressures at the Health
                 Protection Branch.

                 "If I was doing a research project I'd want to eliminate
                 as many variables as possible," he says, referring to the
                 macaque colony's disease-free status and richly
                 documented medical history. "That's why these animals
                 would be highly desirable."

                 But he says the animals are also expensive to maintain
                 and "do you breed them for the sake of breeding them on
                 the chance that there might be a buyer?"

                 One of the leading U.S. authorities on lab animals,
                 citing this week's recommendations on Amerian
                 chimpanzees, says Canada should tread carefully before
                 commercializing its primate colony -- for both economic
                 and ethical reasons.

                 "There's money to be made, but I doubt the market is that
                 large," says Andrew Rowan, director of the Tufts
                 University Centre for Animals and Public Policy.

                 Mr. Rowan recently met with Health Canada officials, as
                 they began to ponder the future of the colony, to provide
                 advice on alternatives to animal research. He recalls
                 that "there was a lot of tension in the room" because
                 many of the scientists were concerned about losing their
                 jobs should the monkey colony be disbanded.

                 "My own preference is that we should look toward
                 decreasing animals in research instead of looking for
                 ways to promote it," he said. "The danger is that you can
                 oversell one's need (for monkeys) in order to justify the
                 maintenance of the population."

                  FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | BUSINESS | NATIONAL | WORLD
                                        | EDITORIALS
                    ENTERTAINMENT | YOUR MONEY | INTERNET | COLUMNISTS |
                                         CLASSIFIED
                         Praise or criticism? Give us your FEEDBACK

                             Copyright 1997 The Ottawa Citizen
Ottawa Citizen   Hit reload or refresh if you're not getting today's
Online           date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   [Image]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   [Image]

[Image]
[Image]
[Image]

National
Highlights
[Image]National
News
[Image]Across
Canada
[Image]News in
Depth
                  FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | BUSINESS | NATIONAL | WORLD
                                        | EDITORIALS
                    ENTERTAINMENT | YOUR MONEY | INTERNET | COLUMNISTS |
                                         CLASSIFIED

                 [National - Ottawa Citizen Online]

                                   Thursday 17 July 1997

                 Animal research: part of the price of good health

                 Even scientists dedicated to ending animal testing admit
                 facilities like Ottawa's primate colony will be needed
                 for a long time, writes Sharon Kirkey

                 Sharon Kirkey
                 The Ottawa Citizen

                 Skin substitutes and brain cells that can grow in Petri
                 dishes are just some of the alternatives scientists are
                 aggressively pursuing to reduce the need for using
                 animals in research.

                 But even the director of an organization dedicated to
                 ending testing on animals doubts medical science will
                 overcome the need for facilities such as Health Canada's
                 colony of research monkeys -- at least in the foreseeable
                 future.

                 "I have to have as my goal that at some point in the
                 future we won't be doing animal research," says Gilly
                 Griffin, executive director of the Ottawa-based Canadian
                 Centre for Alternatives to Animals in Research.

                 "But I have to take a pragmatic view too. We still have
                 big, big problems to solve. We haven't solved AIDS, we
                 haven't solved neurodegenerative diseases, we haven't
                 solved cancer," Ms. Griffin said.

                 "We can do a lot of (research) in cellular systems, but
                 at the end of the day you're still going to have to do a
                 bit of animal research as well."

                 A colony of 750 long-tailed macaque monkeys is poised to
                 become the latest victim of federal government
                 restructuring and downsizing. A Royal Society panel of
                 scientists and philosophers has been appointed to
                 determine, among other key considerations, whether the
                 colony is "unique, valuable and necessary" to protect the
                 health of Canadians.

                 The monkeys cost the government about $1 million a year
                 to maintain. That money comes from Health Canada
                 emergency funds. The monkeys have been used in research
                 into AIDS and herpes, to screen polio vaccines and to
                 measure the effects of ingesting chemicals ranging from
                 PCBs to caffeine.

                 But just how much Canada -- and medical science
                 researchers -- still need a monkey breeding colony has
                 emerged as a key issue in the controversy.

                 "What I'm hoping is that the Royal Society will have a
                 good look at what kind of research is really necessary at
                 this point using primates in Canada," said Ms. Griffin,
                 who is also an information officer for the Council on
                 Animal Care, which ensures animals used in research are
                 properly care for.

                 "I think that we should be looking less and less to using
                 primates," Ms. Griffin said. "There is not much use for
                 them in testing procedures any more, and in terms of
                 research, who knows?"

                 Researchers are moving away from using animals in
                 experiments, not only because of pressure from
                 animal-welfare activists but cost.

                 Today, researchers are investigating alternatives that
                 can stop compounds from ever reaching animals for
                 testing, Ms. Griffin said.

                 For example, researchers are using jelly-like substances
                 for eye and skin toxicity tests. One such substance,
                 called corristex, is being used to test materials for
                 corrosiveness. Until now, these chemicals would have been
                 tested on rabbit skin.

                 Researchers are using a bacteria test to determine
                 whether a chemical can produce a mutation that may lead
                 to cancer.

                 Previously, scientists had to test for those DNA
                 mutations in animals.

                 And scientists are working on different cell cultures to
                 try to get brain cells, or neurons, to grow in Petri
                 dishes the same way they would grow in animals.

                 But while alternatives to animal testing like these are
                 becoming part of mainstream science, researchers probably
                 will never be able to completely simulate the human body
                 "with a lab dish or computer, at least not in my lifetime
                 or your lifetime," said a senior Health Canada research
                 scientist, who asked not to be identified.

                 "The proof in the pudding, as far as I'm concerned, is
                 that you have to put the chemical back into the whole
                 animal to see if it does react the way that things seem
                 to be going on in the test tube."

                 Thalidomide, the anti-morning-sickness drug that was
                 banned worldwide in 1962 after causing severe birth
                 defects in more than 12,000 babies, was never thoroughly
                 tested in animals.

                 "When it comes down to putting something into humans,
                 whether it's a food additive or drug or an environmental
                 pollutant, you have to go to an animal system to do some
                 of your testing," the Health Canada scientist said.

                 And no one knows what diseases or viruses lurk around the
                 corner.

                 The main reason monkeys are used in research is because
                 they are so close to humans on the evolutionary ladder.
                 The similarity of monkey AIDS to human AIDS has allowed
                 the disease in monkeys to serve as a model for the human
                 disease.

                 If Health Canada were to close the monkey colony, "we
                 would have to look at importing those animals again," Ms.
                 Griffin said.

                 Only about one of every 10 primates that are trapped and
                 then transported for research survives -- one of the
                 reasons the federal colony was put in place.

                 "I don't want to see us going through getting (monkeys)
                 from the wild again," Ms. Griffin said.

                 "What I would like to see, and I hope this is what the
                 Royal Society is going to do, is really give a good
                 objective look at what research is actually being done,
                 and what research is really necessary using primates in
                 Canada."

                  FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | BUSINESS | NATIONAL | WORLD
                                        | EDITORIALS
                    ENTERTAINMENT | YOUR MONEY | INTERNET | COLUMNISTS |
                                         CLASSIFIED
                         Praise or criticism? Give us your FEEDBACK

                             Copyright 1997 The Ottawa Citizen
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:06:52 -0700
From: Sean Thomas 
To: ar-news@envirolink.com
Subject: Monkey Business
Message-ID: <33CFF70C.2F48@sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------74DE1F3A367"

Sean Thomas, Co-Director
Animal Action
Ottawa Citizen   Hit reload or refresh if you're not getting today's
Online           date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   [Image]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   [Image]

[Image]
[Image]
[Image]

National
Highlights
[Image]National
News
[Image]Across
Canada
[Image]News in
Depth
                  FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | BUSINESS | NATIONAL | WORLD
                                        | EDITORIALS
                    ENTERTAINMENT | YOUR MONEY | INTERNET | COLUMNISTS |
                                         CLASSIFIED

                 [National - Ottawa Citizen Online]

                                   Thursday 17 July 1997

                 Monkey business

                 Panelists deciding fate of a $1M-a-year monkey colony
                 will try to detach themselves from their evolutionary
                 cousins, writes Charles Enman.

                 Charles Enman.
                 Ottawa Citizen

                 A Royal Society panel will consider whether Health Canada
                 still needs the colony of monkeys that it keeps at
                 Tunney's Pasture.

                 It costs $1 million per year to keep the 750 long-tailed
                 macaque monkeys in captivity -- so the panelists will
                 have to look, in part, at economic and bottom-line
                 considerations, especially in a time of shrinking
                 departmental budgets.

                 Of course, these aren't goldfish or white rats -- they're
                 monkeys, our furry evolutionary cousins. And some people
                 think they therefore come with ties that bind.

                 But do the five panelists think so?

                 The Citizen spoke to three of them yesterday. Each said
                 they care about monkeys but would not allow their
                 feelings to savage the dispassion they must bring to the
                 issue at hand.

                 So you see, their feelings are avuncular, but there's not
                 a monkey's uncle among them.

                 The chair of the panel, Conrad Brunk, is a philosophy
                 professor at the University of Waterloo.

                 From childhood, monkeys have had some place in his
                 imaginary universe.

                 "As a small child, I had a fantasy of owning a monkey,"
                 he recalls. "I loved to think about the organ grinder's
                 monkey. And I loved to be read stories about monkeys."

                 Did he feel an affinity for monkeys?

                 "Obviously I did, and I think that's natural for humans.
                 The behaviour of monkeys is so close to our own -- and
                 especially close to the behaviour of children.

                 "I think a child, seeing a monkey, will say, 'Here's a
                 being that's very close to my own experience of the
                 world.'"

                 Mr. Brunk says the very closeness of primate
                 consciousness and sensibility to the human "makes the
                 whole issue of animal welfare and animal rights
                 especially sensitive. Monkeys and other primates have a
                 broader range of potential injuries and emotional
                 reactions than lower animals.

                 "Is the monkey feeling bored? Feeling confined? Maybe
                 feeling deprived of certain kinds of activity natural to
                 the species? These questions will have more impact on a
                 monkey's consciousness than they would on a fish or
                 chicken or rat."

                 The very resemblance of monkeys and other primates to
                 human beings means "we owe them the kind of treatment and
                 respect that is very similar to what we owe ourselves,"
                 Mr. Brunk said.

                 The same treatment we give to children, say?

                 "No, I wouldn't go that far. But there is a possibility
                 that they could suffer in a way that, considering their
                 evolvement, is simply unacceptable."

                 Mr. Brunk said the committee will have to seek a
                 consensus that represents not only the member's views but
                 those of the Canadian public at large. For that reason,
                 the public will be invited to submit its views on whether
                 the government should maintain the primate colony at
                 Tunney's Pasture.

                 For Michael McDonald, director of the Centre for Applied
                 Ethics at the University of British Columbia, the
                 resemblance of monkey to man is incontestable.

                 "Even as a child, seeing monkeys at zoos and circuses, I
                 was fascinated to see how much they are like us --
                 they're so social, they need lots of contact with their
                 own kind.

                 "Of course, they're our genetic kin, and many people
                 would say they're in some ways our spiritual brothers.
                 They have a more developed mental and emotional space
                 that does recall the human being."

                 Ethicists even see the beginnings of moral behaviour
                 among monkeys, Mr. McDonald says.

                 "They seem to develop something that looks like morality
                 among themselves," he says. "There seems something
                 altruistic in the way parent monkeys care for their
                 offspring. And sometimes you see behaviour that looks
                 like sacrifice for the sake of the group." An example of
                 the latter could be the struggle a dominant monkey will
                 engage in with intruders.

                 "Is this really altruism?" Mr. McDonald asks. "Perhaps
                 it's just something to preserve the dominance of the
                 alpha male. But a great deal of primate behaviour seems
                 to demonstrate that ethics may simply be an evolutionary
                 adaptation to living with creatures of your own kind."

                 Andrew G. Hendrickx, director of the California Regional
                 Primate Centre at the University of California at Davis,
                 has worked with monkeys for 35 years.

                 Growing up on a farm in Minnesota, he never saw a monkey.
                 But after completing university, he started working with
                 them and was immediately fascinated.

                 "And I'm still fascinated," he says. "Their intelligence
                 and their emotional similarity to us has got to spark
                 some degree of emotional connection.

                 He says, however, that his "scientific objectivity is
                 never clouded."

                 The lab monkey's life is no dog's life, he's quick to
                 point out.

                 Lab directors now insist on "environmental enrichment
                 opportunities" for their primate charges.

                 Captive monkeys typically enjoy what Mr. Hendrickx
                 compares to the jungle gyms that city parks provide for
                 children. Monkeys used to be housed singly, but are now
                 kept in groups to reduce loneliness. Mirrors are put up
                 in cages so the monkeys can keep tabs on what their
                 cohorts are doing.

                 Captive monkeys also get excellent nutrition and medical
                 care.

                 "With the nutrition and the medical care and the
                 enrichment, I would say the monkey in the lab is better
                 off and probably happier than the monkey in the jungle,"
                 Mr. Hendrickx says.

                 Mr. McDonald says the committee will consider many
                 options.

                 Perhaps the colony should be maintained. Perhaps it
                 should be sold piecemeal to other research groups.
                 Perhaps the monkeys should be kept from reproducing and
                 simply allowed to die out.

                 Or perhaps the animals should be put down, though he
                 doesn't like this last possibility.

                 But Pierre Thibert, chief of the animal resources
                 division at Health Canada, says no monkey is in peril.

                 If it is decided to sell the monkey colony, a nucleus
                 group might be sold intact to a research group in the
                 United States or Canada. The others would be sold to
                 other interested research institutions.

                 "I'm quite sure there is no way we will be killing the
                 animals," Mr. Thibert says.

                 Monkeys sell for between $1,000 and $4,000, depending on
                 their age. The most valuable are of reproductive age.

                  FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | BUSINESS | NATIONAL | WORLD
                                        | EDITORIALS
                    ENTERTAINMENT | YOUR MONEY | INTERNET | COLUMNISTS |
                                         CLASSIFIED
                         Praise or criticism? Give us your FEEDBACK

                             Copyright 1997 The Ottawa Citizen

ARRS Tools  |  News  |  Orgs  |  Search  |  Support  |  About the ARRS  |  Contact ARRS

THIS SITE UNDERWRITTEN IN PART BY:
Cyberian Outpost

The views and opinions expressed within this page are not necessarily those of the
EnviroLink Network nor the Underwriters. The views are those of the authors of the work.