AR-NEWS Digest 498 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Admin Note--subscription options by allen schubert 2) Lake Eucha Drowning in Algae (Oklahoma, USA) by SDURBIN@VM.TULSA.CC.OK.US 3) latest update on the animal ambulance for Israel issue by 0 <74754.654@CompuServe.COM> 4) [UK]Barry Horne's hunger strike: Press Release by "Miggi" 5) Protecting habitat is bullet government fears to bite by BKMACKAY@aol.com 6) letters needed re: anti-hunting video by Heidi Prescott 7) Vt. Moose Advocates File Motion in Court by Mike Markarian 8) Guardians Media Release (Australia) by Coral Hull 9) The General Motors kills animals by "sa338@blues.uab.es" 10) US Importing Canadian Grizzlys ? by Ty Savoy Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 07:12:35 -0400 From: allen schubert To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: Admin Note--subscription options Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970818071232.006c0a88@clark.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" [routine post] Here are some items of general information (found in the "welcome letter" sent when people subscribe--but often lose!)...included: how to post and how to change your subscription status (useful if you are going on vacation--either by "unsubscribe" or "postpone"). --------------------------------------------------------------- To post messages to the list, send mail to ar-news@envirolink.org POSTING To post a *news-related item* (no discussions), send your message to: ar-news@envirolink.org Appropriate postings to AR-News include: posting a news item, requesting information on some event, or responding to a request for information. Discussions on AR-News will NOT be allowed and we ask that any commentary either be taken to AR-Views or to private E-mail. ------------------------------------------ ***General Subscription Information*** ALL THE FOLLOWING SHOULD NOT be sent to ar-news !!! (send them to listproc@envirolink.org) For all commands, use a blank Subject line. --------------------------------------------------- To request a digest version, send mail to listproc@envirolink.org with the following single line: set ar-news mail digest To switch back to immediate mail, and to get copies of *your* postings also, send the following command: set ar-news mail ack or the following to not get your own postings: set ar-news mail noack To see how you are set up ***(and to see if you are still subscribed!)***, use set ar-news To temporarily stop mailings, use: set ar-news mail postpone To re-enable it, use ack, noack, or digest as above. To unsubscribe, use: unsubscribe ar-news or: signoff ar-news If you have to subscribe again, use: subscribe ar-news first_name last_name (use false name if you want!) If you have problems, please contact: Allen Schubert ar-admin@envirolink.org Date: Mon, 18 Aug 97 08:41:47 UTC From: SDURBIN@VM.TULSA.CC.OK.US To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: Lake Eucha Drowning in Algae (Oklahoma, USA) Message-ID: <199708181347.JAA16951@envirolink.org> (Tulsa World): Parts of Lake Eucha look more like a stagnant pond than one of Tulsa's main drinking water sources. Green slime and thick algae several feet deep blanket about 20 acres of the lake upstream near Brush Creek tributary. "It's worse right now than it has ever been," said Harry Chichester, environmental supervisor for Tulsa's Public Works Dept. An Oklahoma Conservation Commission study released earlier this year shows that the water quality of Lake Eucha is being threatened by high levels of nutrients that likely are coming from the abundance of dried poultry waste in the watershed upstream. The study also shows that certain tributaries in the watershed have high levels of bacteria, "which we are very concerned about," Public Works Director Charles Hardt said. Less than a month from the start date of a new law designed to regulate animal production and protect the state's water supplies from animal waste, alga growth in Lake Eucha is at its peak, Hardt said. The dense algae that now hug the shoreline and stretch 50 to 100 yds. into the lake have put an end to fishing from the bank and are playing havoc with boats, Chichester said. "This is not static. It's a very dynamic thing going on here," he said. But for Northeastern Oklahoma, where dry chicken litter is the issue, House Bill 1522, the Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Act, which becomes effective Sept. 1, will have no impact on most chicken farmers because it does not address dry litter. -- Sherrill Date: 18 Aug 97 11:12:18 EDT From: 0 <74754.654@CompuServe.COM> To: Ian Lance Taylor Subject: latest update on the animal ambulance for Israel issue Message-ID: <970818151218_74754.654_EHL81-1@CompuServe.COM> LATEST UPDATE ON ANIMAL AMBULANCE FOR ISRAEL I received a phone call Sunday afternoon (a regular work day in Israel) from Avraham Poraz, the Knesset member who is spearheading efforts in Israel to get the bill passed that will allow animal and people ambulances into Israel on the same duty-free basis. MK Poraz said that although the Treasury agreed to pay the customs duties on the first vehicle we want to ship - a donation to the SPCA in Tiberias - and although the Minister of Finance agreed to accept the money from the Treasury in payment of the customs duties and to allow the ambulance in, once again bureaucrats within the Ministry of Finance are creating an obstacle. In Israel, on certain matters, career bureaucrats have more power than the Minister, who is a political appointee. MK Poraz believes he can overcome this latest roadblock they have set. I am leaving for Israel on Friday for several weeks and will see what I can do while I'm there. Hopefully, we can surmount this last obstacle and finally get the ambulance in! Nina Natelson Director, CHAI Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 18:39:38 +0000 From: "Miggi" To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: [UK]Barry Horne's hunger strike: Press Release Message-ID: <199708181738.SAA29576@serv4.vossnet.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > From: ALFSG > BARRY HORNE SUPPORT CAMPAIGN > Box M, 111 Magdalen Rd, Oxford, OX4 1RQ. > Tel: 01954 230542. Mobile: 0976 200724. Email: > barry@londonaa.demon.co.uk > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Press Release > Monday 18 August > > Prison imposes punishment regime on animal rights hunger striker Barry > ********************************************************************** > > As Barry completes the first week of his hunger strike today (Mon 18 > Aug), the prison authorities have withdrawn all but his most basic > privileges. In effect, this means Barry is confined to his cell for 23 > hours a day and not allowed to associate with any other prisoners. > > Barrys condition deteriorates > ------------------------------ > This alarming development comes at a time when Barrys condition has > begun to worsen as he is still weak from the effects of his previous 35- > day hunger strike which only came to an end six months ago. Friends who > visited Barry yesterday (Sun 17 Aug) have reported that although he is > physically weaker, he is, as always, very strong in spirit. > > Messages of support flood in from around the world > -------------------------------------------------- > Within days of the start of the hunger strike, messages of support began > to arrive at Bristol Prison. By the fourth day, Barry had personally > replied to fifty letters from around the world. Many other messages have > been received at Barrys email address, which are immediately forwarded > to him. Unfortunately, Barry now feels unable to concentrate to reply > personally, but wishes it to be known that letters of support will be > read and are still appreciated. > > Vigil planned at Bristol Prison to mark first week of hunger strike > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > A night-time vigil is planned for tomorrow (Tue 19 - Wed 20 Aug) to mark > the first week of the hunger strike. While this is expected to be a > token presence, there is no doubt that as time runs out, numbers will > swell, as anger and frustration overwhelm Barrys friends and > supporters. > > Campaign petition takes off > --------------------------- > The national petition against vivisection which is being run in > conjuction with this campaign has already been signed by tens of > thousands of people, including all the prisoners on Barrys wing and > even two of his prison guards. > > > For more information, contact the campaign as per letterhead. > -- > ALFSG > > Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 13:55:43 -0400 (EDT) From: BKMACKAY@aol.com To: ar-news@envirolink.org Cc: OnlineAPI@aol.com Subject: Protecting habitat is bullet government fears to bite Message-ID: <970818135302_-419829895@emout01.mail.aol.com> Nature Trail for Sunday, August 17, 1997: The Toronto Star. By Barry Kent MacKay PROTECTING HABITAT IS BULLET GOVERNMENT FEARS TO BITE What do you do when you are a loyal Canadian who, like most Canadians, cares deeply about the very nature of your country; when you share the majority of Canadians' desire to protect our native wildlife from extinction; when you know our government has committed itself to the same values so many of us hold sacred, and then reneged on that commitment? The quandary of what to do was faced by my colleagues and me at Animal Alliance of Canada. We knew that Canada boldly signed the Biodiversity Convention in Rio, five years ago. That action committed us to producing federal legislation to protect endangered species. The Liberal government went through the motions with Bill C-65. Promised in the 1996 Throne Speech and introduced in October of that year, the proposed legislation passed committee hearings last February and was ready for debate in Parliament by early March. Bill C-65 was a weak-kneed, ineffective piece of rubbish widely ridiculed by conservationists, but at least it was something. Even it went nowhere because it died with the closure of the last Parliament and election call. The interest the current government is showing in meeting its obligation is as lively as a bloated fish carcass on the garbage-strewn bank of a polluted stream. The Animal Alliance, joined by the Council of Canadians and Greenpeace Canada --- all three being not-for-profit, public interest, non-governmental organizations who have previously gone to Ottawa about the need for effective endangered species legislation --- issued a complaint on July 22 against the Canadian government to the Commission for Environmental Co-operation, under article 14 of the North American Agreement on Environmental Co-operation. The commission's article 14 allows mere citizens to file a complaint that a member country is "failing to effectively enforce its environmental law". We are represented by Clayton Ruby of Ruby and Edwardh, Barristers, in Toronto. When Canada ratified the Biodiversity Convention by an order-in-council on Dec. 4, 1992, it bound itself to fulfilling the requirements of the convention. Article 8(k) of the convention says that each signatory is comitted to "develop or maintain necessary legislation and/or other regulatory provisions for the protection of threatened species and populations." Our own Canadian Parliament's standing committee on environment unanimously ruled in April, 1992, that Canada had not met its obligation and recommended "immediate steps" be taken to do so. Whenever professional wildlife experts discuss means of protecting endangered species, or preventing endangerment, the emphasis inevitably falls on the need to protect habitat. That is the bullet the Liberal government cannot bring itself to bite. Although the concern is short-term and absurdly simplistic, the fear is that protecting habitat means disappointing big-buck commercial interests, a fear fueled by extremist right-wing rhetoric and fanned by the failure of the environment to become a major issue in the last election. The animals and plants we are destroying cannot wait until environmental losses trigger public concern, which has never wavered inits support of protection for endangered species. -30- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 12:55:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Heidi Prescott To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: letters needed re: anti-hunting video Message-ID: <2.2.16.19970819170035.2b873e46@pop.igc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" LETTERS NEEDED Many of you may be familiar with The Fund's educational video, What's Wrong With Hunting. It is an entertaining and factual anti-hunting video that is currently being distributed to high-schools around the country. The Fund recently applied for a grant from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (which funded a pro-wildlife video) for funding to distribute the video. The hunters have been ballistic about the application and the fact that the video is already being distributed to schools across the country. I guess someone on that side recognized that our arguments are more persuasive to children and when presented with both sides, children will more likely choose not to become hunters. The Safari Club is worried enough to publish a fact sheet called What's Wrong With What's Wrong With Hunting and most hunting publications and hunting organizations have published alerts to their members requesting letters in opposition to the grant. Our grant request was denied. Now that the grant was denied, they are turing their attention to Marv Levy, Coach of the Buffalo Bills, for his narration of the video. Not only are the hunters sending annoying letters to Coach Levy, they are complaining to the owner of the Bills and also to the NFL Commissioner. Our side needs to voice our support of Coach Levy for the wonderful work he did for the video. Letters of support should be sent to: Ralph Wilson Owner Buffalo Bills 1 Bills Drive Orchard Park, NY 14127 Paul Tagliabue Commissioner National Football League 410 Park Ave. New York, NY 10022 Letters to Marv Levy would also be appreciated. Coach Marv Levy Buffalo Bills 1 Bills Drive Orchard Park, NY 14127 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 12:48:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Markarian To: ar-news@envirolink.org, seac+announce@earthsystems.org, en.alerts@conf.igc.apc.org Subject: Vt. Moose Advocates File Motion in Court Message-ID: <2.2.16.19970818161905.5ec7c398@pop.igc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, August 18, 1997 CONTACT: Mike Markarian, (301) 585-2591 MOOSE ADVOCATES FILE MOTION IN LAWSUIT Affidavits from Moose Experts Claim Vermont's Hunt is Scientifically Unfounded RUTLAND, Vt. -- Today, in their continuing lawsuit to halt Vermont's controversial moose hunt, The Fund for Animals and several Vermont residents filed a 63-page motion for summary judgment in U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont. The plaintiffs seek judgment on the merits of their arguments before the next moose hunt, scheduled for October 18-21, 1997. The lawsuit charges that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife violated the National Environmental Policy Act by using federal money to fund 75% of the moose hunt. The Court initially dismissed the case as moot because the federal government asked for part of the money back, but last year the U.S. Court of Appeals noted that "the continued federal funding of recommendations for 'harvest regulation' affecting 'moose densities' reflects an unambiguous involvement by the federal government in the design, magnitude, and conduct of a moose hunt" and that "the exclusion would likely be overridden by the 'highly controversial environmental effects' of the financed activity, which is, after all, moose hunting." "This is the fifth year of Vermont's moose hunt, and this is the fifth year it continues to violate federal law," says Mike Markarian, Director of Campaigns for The Fund for Animals. "This hunt simply must be stopped before more moose and more federal tax dollars are shot to pieces." Today's motion includes an affidavit from Dr. Brian L. Horejsi, one of North America's leading moose biologists. Dr. Horejsi questions Vermont's moose population estimate, and concludes that "it is my professional opinion that Vermont's moose management program is not founded on either a solid database or on good science. As a consequence of these deficiencies the hunt could well prove detrimental to the long-term survival and viability of Vermont's moose population." Adds Markarian, "Vermont officials really have no idea how many moose are in the state, and they believe the only way to count the moose is to shoot them. We are just thankful that these people are not also in charge of the U.S. Census Bureau." The number of moose hunting permits has increased every year, from the original 30 permits in 1993, to 165 permits in 1997, representing a 550% increase. The moose hunt has also expanded geographically from the Northeast Kingdom into additional areas that arguably have very few moose in them, areas that this year will include Montpelier, Barre, and Waterbury. # # # http://www.fund.org Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 08:20:02 -0700 From: Coral Hull To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: Guardians Media Release (Australia) Message-ID: <33F9B9A2.5928@envirolink.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: GUARDIANS MEDIA RELEASE Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 16:56:04 +1000 From: Guardians - A Group Exposing Vivisection Organization: Guardians - A Group Exposing Vivisection To: antiviv@werple.net.au GUARDIANS MEDIA RELEASE DAFFODIL DAY - DEMAND A CHANGE. at http://www.werple.net.au/~antiviv/new.htm Guardians, a mojor Australian group dedicated to exposing vivisection slams the Anti-Cancer Council's funding of animal research. http://www.werple.net.au/~antiviv/new.htm Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 01:18:36 +0200 From: "sa338@blues.uab.es" To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: The General Motors kills animals Message-ID: <33F8D84C.2B3@blues.uab.es> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I am Nuria from Barcelona. I have just found out about the terrible experiments that The general Motors does on animals. You can read about it here: http://www.geocities.com/heartland/ranch/1231/generalmotors.htm Thanks a lot for your concern. For the animals, Nuria http://www.geocities.com/heartland/hills/3787 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 23:15:26 -0300 From: Ty Savoy To: ar-news@envirolink.org Subject: US Importing Canadian Grizzlys ? Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970819021526.006ce71c@north.nsis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Monday, August 18, 1997 The Halifax Herald Limited U.S. ponders bear imports By BOB WEBER / The Canadian Press Edmonton - Importing Canadian grizzly bears is the best way to help restore the animal to an American wilderness where they were once hunted to extinction, a U.S. study concludes. The study, dated July, recommends that up to 15 bears over five years be moved from British Columbia to the Bitterroot Mountains of central Idaho and western Montana. "That's the biggest piece of wild country we have left," said Chris Servheen, who is in charge of the project for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "It's a huge potential habitat." But a coalition of 49 environmental groups on both sides of the border opposes the transfer, saying Canada has no bears to spare. "We have to know the source population is stable," said Mike Sawyer of the Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition. "We can't say that about any Canadian population. Everything points to declining populations." The plan is the preferred option among four alternatives in the study. It will go before public hearings Aug. 27-29. Although the British Columbia government will take no stand on the plan until it gets a formal request for bears, the province is already talking about it with the Americans. "There have been informal discussions," said Matt Austin, a large carnivore specialist with the B.C. environment ministry. The plan suggests bringing about 25 bears to the Bitterroots over five years, half from B.C. and half from U.S. sources. Alberta, which has relatively few grizzlies, will not supply bears. The animals would be brought to the centre region of the Bitterroots and allowed to range over a wide area that borders on cities such as Missoula, Mont., and Coeur d'Alene, Ida. The bears would be considered an experimental and not threatened population, said Servheen. Experimental status gives the department more flexibility to manage the bears while still protecting them, said Servheen. "In terms of killing, there's almost no difference between experimental status and fully listed (as threatened)," he said. Only a bear on private land destroying private property could be shot, said Servheen. Even then, the landowner could only shoot the bear after Fish and Wildlife failed to fix the problem. The plan recalls a controversial 1995 transfer of wolves from Alberta to Yellowstone National Park. That transfer is now considered a success. But like those wolves, any transplanted bears are likely to face an uncertain welcome. Servheen acknowledges widespread public fear of grizzlies. In 1996, the Idaho state legislature passed a motion opposing reintroduction. The plan admits some of the transplanted bears would likely die as a result of the move. Although Austin says no studies have been done into the long-term effects of transferring bears, he adds that grizzly numbers are stable in the south part of the province. But Sawyer maintains that mining, oil and gas exploration and forestry in both Alberta and B.C. are encroaching on grizzly habitat at near-record levels. The effects of that development are unknown, he says. "You don't conserve bears unless you conserve habitat...You have to put constraints on human economic activity and nobody seems to want to do that. "If (the Americans) want our bears, maybe they should be willing to fund the research to make the case that our bears can support the transfer." There's something about bears that stirs up controversy, Austin says. "Grizzly bears are always a delicate issue. There's a lot of factors to be weighed here."