Day 258 - 07 Jun 96 - Page 37
1
2 MS. STEEL: Well, at least one.
3
4 MR. RAMPTON: I am entitled to know.
5
6 MR. MORRIS: "At least one", is the answer.
7
8 MS. STEEL: You are entitled to know, you have the documents of
9 the witnesses, so you can find it from your own files.
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I do not know what people were having for
12 lunch, it certainly has not done anyone any good. Let us
13 all just calm down. There was one inquiry, one firm of
14 inquiry agents carried on?
15 A. Until January 1991.
16
17 Q. Yes?
18 A. That is correct, my Lord.
19
20 MS. STEEL: So, in terms of who organised the October 1991
21 demonstration you would not know who organised that?
22 A. No.
23
24 Q. You would not have any evidence about that?
25 A. No.
26
27 Q. That would also be true for October 1992?
28 A. And thereon.
29
30 Q. And '93, '94, '94?
31 A. Yes.
32
33 Q. Right. And on your evidence, in fact you would not have
34 any evidence at all about who organised anything from
35 London Greenpeace after around about January 1991?
36 A. From when we started the campaign.
37
38 Q. I am talking about after January 1991?
39 A. No, not after January 1991.
40
41 Q. Right.
42 A. That would not be absolutely correct, because clearly
43 you were organising the demonstrations that took place
44 outside of this court.
45
46 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I suppose the answer is this: you do not know
47 from information from private investigators?
48 A. That is absolutely correct.
49
50 Q. What was going on, what inferences one can draw from any
51 other kind of evidence or from evidence about what happened
52 before, that it is entirely a different matter, but you are
53 not saying you have any evidence from private
54 investigators?
55 A. None at all.
56
57 Q. After that?
58 A. No.
59
60 MS. STEEL: Nor any evidence from any other source apart from
