Day 258 - 07 Jun 96 - Page 67


     
     1        Ventouris v Mountain, as in 'hill'.
     2
     3   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I will write it in.
     4
     5   MR. RAMPTON:  Ventouris v Mountain, which is 1991, first volume
     6        of the W.L.R. page 607, with particular reference to the
     7        judgment of Lord Justice Bingham (as he then was) at pages
     8        611 and 612.  My Lord, that is the first one, there is only
     9        one other in which the Plaintiffs were a French
    10        pharmaceutical company called Societee Francais Hoechst v
    11        Alideas Kollods, and that is 1992 Fleet Street Reports,
    12        page 66, the judgment of Mr. Justice Aldous, and there is a
    13        short passage which, in effect, carries into practice what
    14        Lord Justice Bingham said in the Ventouris case at the
    15        bottom of page 68.
    16
    17   MR. JUSTICE BELL: I would like a photocopy of the Fleet Street
    18        report if you have it.
    19
    20   MR. RAMPTON:  I am afraid I have not.
    21
    22   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Not now, but when we come to it.
    23
    24   MR. RAMPTON:  I will give everybody copies of the Fleet Street
    25        Reports because they are quite difficult to get hold of.
    26
    27   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  Thank you.  We will resume at 10.30 on
    28        Monday.
    29
    30        (Court adjourned to Monday, 10th June 1996, 10.30 a.m.)
    31
    32
    33
    34
    35
    36
    37
    38
    39
    40
    41
    42
    43
    44
    45
    46
    47
    48
    49
    50 
    51 
    52 
    53
    54
    55
    56
    57
    58
    59
    60

Prev Next Index