Day 164 - 26 Sep 95 - Page 14
1 stage, given that it confers so little benefit on the
2 resolution of the issues in the case.
3
4 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Thank you. What do you want to go on to
5 next, Mr. Morris?
6
7 MR. MORRIS: Maybe it is a bit early to have the break. We want
8 to organise ourselves. Maybe if Mr. Rampton wants to
9 introduce the scheduling discussion?
10
11 MR. RAMPTON: No, I do not.
12
13 MR. JUSTICE BELL: How long do you want? Do you want the
14 five-minute break now?
15
16 MS. STEEL: I wanted to raise something, but I am just trying to
17 get something down before we move on.
18
19 MR. MORRIS: I thought Mr. Rampton wanted to raise matters to do
20 with scheduling.
21
22 MR. RAMPTON: No. I want to to deal with that tomorrow.
23
24 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think it would be just as well to deal with
25 the other matters and then come to scheduling in case there
26 are any ramifications of matters which are raised.
27
28 MR. MORRIS: One thing I was going to ask about documents in
29 general was I know that you have all our documents,
30 I think, that have been served, but do you have our
31 original list to go with your files? I was a little bit
32 concerned they may have been tabbed with a list on them,
33 because they are not in the general index, our documents
34 are not identified.
35
36 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I have your original list of documents.
37 I cannot immediately find a date. It is B3 in a bundle
38 which is called section B of bundle A and B.
39
40 MR. MORRIS: Is that the one that has over 200 documents?
41
42 MR. JUSTICE BELL: 212.
43
44 MR. MORRIS: Yes. There were supplementary lists before the
45 trial as well and then there were some during the trial.
46
47 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes. (4) is the Defendants' supplementary
48 list of documents which has 18 listed documents.
49
50 MR. MORRIS: OK. That is good.
51
52 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Does Ms. Steel want to raise a matter?
53
54 MR. MORRIS: Yes, I think she does.
55
56 MS. STEEL: It is just I think that during the summer the
57 Plaintiffs served a letter or something confirming they
58 wanted all their Civil Evidence Act statements taken as
59 read. I just wondered, are they from then taken as read or
60 do they get read out at a later stage, because there was
