Day 202 - 11 Jan 96 - Page 32
1 says, "Cleanliness in 194"; that is Clacton?
2 A. That is correct.
3
4 Q. ".... is a problem". Did you encourage Neil Skehel to take
5 any action against Clacton for these points that you were
6 outlining?
7 A. I have not read this review and I have not seen it
8 since I wrote it on the 4th February 1992, so it would be
9 of use if I could read it through now, but I would guess
10 from the other reviews it would be quite balanced in what
11 it asks Neil to do. Should I read it through?
12
13 Q. You can read it through quickly.
14
15 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I would not, but wait and see what Mr. Morris
16 puts to you.
17
18 MR. MORRIS: In the middle of the second page?
19 A. OK.
20
21 Q. It is -----
22
23 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Whose the signature -- that is actually your
24 signature at the end, is it?
25 A. Yes, the signature at the end is mine.
26
27 Q. Yes.
28
29 MR. MORRIS: Let me have a look to see if I need to bring
30 anything up there.
31
32 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I would not, Mr. Morris. What I am trying to
33 get over to you is the main point. I would have thought
34 you might want to put to him the first sentence under
35 "People Development" and the first half a dozen words of
36 that. That is probably the most important bit of this.
37
38 MR. MORRIS: OK. Going on to page 3, there were a couple of
39 things on that page. It says "for 1992". I believe that
40 is 1991 because this was done in ---
41
42 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It must have been.
43
44 MR. MORRIS: -- February 1992.
45 A. Yes, that must have been a mistake.
46
47 Q. Can we change that?
48 A. I do not know if we are allowed to go back and alter
49 people's performance reviews.
50
51 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You are probably like me. The first few days
52 of January are jolly good in getting the right year and
53 your concentration lapses, and by the beginning of February
54 you are getting it all wrong again.
55
56 MR. MORRIS: The figures below are for 1991, yes, if you did
57 this in February '92?
58 A. I think we must assume that they are for 1991. It
59 would be difficult to get a consolidated year end project
60 for the year end for February.
