Day 096 - 03 Mar 95 - Page 67


     
     1        over that long number of years is concerned, is it your
     2        view that goads used to cause your pigs pain or not?
     3        A.  I would not consider that they actually do cause
     4        distress.  They are only like two U2 batteries at the end
     5        of the day in a container, so actually I think I could get
     6        just as big a shock off my grandson's little electric car.
     7
     8   Q.   Finally Mr. Bowes, stunning.  You have explained clearly
     9        why it is that having two pigs or even three pigs in the
    10        stun pen at any one time does not achieve an overall
    11        increase in the speed of the slaughtering?
    12        A.  No.
    13
    14   Q.   What then is the reason for having more than one pig in the
    15        stunning pen at any one time?
    16        A.  Comradeship, safety in numbers.
    17
    18   Q.   Do you mean comradeship for the pigs or for the humans?
    19        A.  For the pigs.
    20
    21   Q.   Would you rather have two or three pigs in a stunning pen
    22        if you can at a time then a single one?
    23        A.  In a perfect world I would rather have two all the
    24        time.
    25
    26   Q.   Two?
    27        A.  Yes.
    28
    29   Q.   That is the ideal, is it?
    30        A.  Yes.
    31
    32   MR. RAMPTON:  Thank you Mr. Bowes.
    33
    34   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Thank your, Mr. Bowes.
    35
    36   THE WITNESS:  Thank you sir.
    37
    38                       (The witness withdrew).
    39
    40   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, may he be released.
    41
    42   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.
    43
    44   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, there is a matter which I have been asked
    45        to mention and it is best I do so while it is fresh in
    46        everybody's mind.  It is this.  Mrs. Brinley-Codd who is,
    47        by and large, a very uncomplaining person, was recently
    48        most upset by the conduct of the Defendants while she was
    49        showing that film in two respects.  The first is that they
    50        sat in their seats and barked orders at her with hardly so 
    51        much as a please or thank you.  The second is that without 
    52        any invitation or licence from her they have taken it that 
    53        they are free to use her Christian name not only in open
    54        court but in private communication.  Private communication
    55        she can deal with, that is not a matter for your Lordship,
    56        but she takes the strongest objection to that kind of I can
    57        only call it boarish behaviour in open court.  That is all
    58        I say.
    59
    60   MS. STEEL:  I was not barking orders.  I was perfectly polite.

Prev Next Index