Day 265 - 19 Jun 96 - Page 45


     
     1
     2   Q.   When were you first asked to give evidence in this case?
     3        A.   I cannot recall.
     4
     5   Q.   Would it have been shortly before you made your first
     6        statement?
     7        A.   Perhaps.  I really could not recall.
     8
     9   Q.   All the statements you have made, they are basically made
    10        from all your notes.  Is that right?
    11        A.  That is right.
    12
    13   Q.   And when you checked the statement before signing it, you
    14        did that by comparing to it your notes?
    15        A.   I believe that is right, yes.
    16
    17   Q.   Well, do you remember whether you did or not?
    18        A.   I remember reading my notes, yes.
    19
    20   Q.   Right, and that was true for all the statements you made?
    21        A.   Yes.
    22
    23   Q.   And when you checked them against your notes, all your
    24        notes were there.  There were not parts covered up or
    25        anything like that when you were checking, were they?
    26        A.   I do not recall.  I do not think that was the case on
    27        the later statement that I have made but on the other
    28        statements I do not recall.  I do not think they were
    29        covered up.
    30
    31   Q.   Sorry.  When you checked them against your latest
    32        statement?
    33        A.   The notes that I looked at when making my latest
    34        statement were photocopies of the original notes.
    35
    36   Q.   Right.  So you did not see the original notebook when you
    37        made your latest statement?
    38        A.  I have not seen the original notebook since 1990, I
    39        think; whenever.
    40
    41   Q.   So, well, you said you could not remember about the two
    42        other two statements you made.  You might have seen the
    43        notebook then?
    44        A.   Perhaps.  It was some years ago.
    45
    46   Q.   So what were the instructions that you were given when you
    47        were taken on for this investigation?
    48        A.   To attend meetings, to identify or attempt to identify
    49        the authors of, or the distributors of or printers of, or
    50        simply those involved with the antiMcDonald campaign, sir. 
    51 
    52   Q.   Were there any instructions about how you should go about 
    53        doing that apart from simple attendance at meetings?
    54        A.   I was asked to attempt to become accepted as a group
    55        member and to, in that role, identify those involved with
    56        the group and primarily those involved with the campaign,
    57        sir.
    58
    59   Q.   Were there instructions about how you should become
    60        accepted as a group member?

Prev Next Index