Day 278 - 11 Jul 96 - Page 30
1 A. Yes, I do.
2
3 Q. Yes. So it includes you does it not?
4 A. It includes us, yes.
5
6 Q. Yes. And the leaflet, what was that a reference to, which
7 leaflet was that a reference to, the new one or the old
8 one?
9 A. Just let me read it, it is a long time since I have
10 read this.
11
12 Q. Yes, do.
13
14 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Which part, the leaflet where?
15
16 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, the beginning of the last paragraph --
17 "We stand by what we said in the leaflet". Since it is
18 ambiguous I thought the witness--
19
20 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No, it is just that it appears in different
21 places. I think it probably means the same thing wherever
22 it appears, but just in case there was a different context,
23 that is all.
24 A. I do not really know, to be honest. Looks like it is
25 about the leaflet which is available, but I am not sure.
26
27 MR. RAMPTON: Which, as I suggested to you this morning, had by
28 1991 changed its colours very considerably had it not?
29 A. It had been rewritten by a different person who
30 expressed themselves in a different way and included
31 different material.
32
33 Q. There is one final thing I want to ask you about, Miss
34 Steel and then I will have finished.
35
36 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Am I to see this?
37
38 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, may I just ask a couple of questions
39 first?
40
41 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
42
43 MR. RAMPTON: Has the Mclibel support campaign, during the
44 course of this case, put out what it calls Trial News?
45 A. Yes.
46
47 Q. Did it, for the purposes of putting out those bulletins,
48 obtain information from you and Mr. Morris?
49 A. Yes.
50
51 Q. Have you seen -- look at the first one, for example --
52 these documents before?
53 A. Yes, they are all jumbled up actually.
54
55 Q. I know. There is a reason for that. They are
56 chronological. The first one is trial news January 1995.
57 A. The first one is one page of Trial News January 1995.
58
59 Q. That is right.
60 A. The second one is a press cutting which is nothing to
