Day 257 - 06 Jun 96 - Page 68
1 to read that', so it does not do any harm to put out just
2 what you hope to get out of it.
3
4 MR. RAMPTON: Can I also say, it may be important because the
5 documents question is, so far as the Defendants are
6 concerned, still outstanding, it does have to be cleared up
7 before, I hope, 18th July. This is a classic example. If
8 Mr. Fairgrieve says he accepts the findings it is very
9 important from the Defendants' point of view that if they
10 want to rely on what eight groups of 12 people thought, if
11 that is what it is, or 769 in another part of the document,
12 as actual evidence of fact stated, then they had better
13 establish with Mr. Fairgrieve whether he agrees with the
14 facts stated as opposed to accepting the findings as being
15 something the Company needs to react on, or respond to.
16
17 MR. JUSTICE BELL: As I understand it, you accept that these
18 -- correct me in I am wrong -- were the facts stated by the
19 various people who were interviewed and, as I understand
20 it, because Mr. Rampton may want to ask you about this
21 afterwards, you accept the comments in the qualitative
22 side, as we are now looking at the quantitative side, but
23 you accept the comments in the qualitative side as valid
24 comments?
25 A. As an accurate representation of our customers'
26 viewpoint of us at that point in time.
27
28 Q. Yes. 10.30 tomorrow morning.
29
30 (The court adjourned to the following day at 10.30 a.m.)
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
