Day 094 - 01 Mar 95 - Page 75
1
2 MS. STEEL: Is Mr. Rampton giving evidence?
3
4 MR. RAMPTON: No, my Lord. It is in the bundle. It is in the
5 agreed documents. That is why I so often object to
6 selective treatment of the documents.
7
8 MR. MORRIS: If Mr. Rampton wants to make a comment -----
9
10 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Do not bother. I will wait and see what
11 evidence we get to that effect.
12
13 MR. RAMPTON: I will come back to in re-examination anyway. My
14 Lord, I would like to hand in some documents, if I may?
15 The first is merely an addition to your Lordship's
16 correspondence file. The next one, my Lord, arises out of
17 evidence of Mr. Atherton. It concerned the question which
18 was not clear from Mr. Wignall's statement whether there
19 were two -----
20
21 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Excuse me a moment. Do go and sit down,
22 Dr. Gomez.
23
24 (The witness withdrew)
25
26 MR. RAMPTON: It concerns the question whether there were two
27 increases in cooking temperatures after Preston. That is a
28 memorandum relating to that question. Most of these
29 documents come from Mr. Kenny who is due to give evidence,
30 I think, next week. The next one, my Lord ------
31
32 MR. MORRIS: Can we be given them?
33
34 MR. RAMPTON: Yes, yes, you will get them.
35
36 MR. MORRIS: It would be good to have them while you are going
37 through.
38
39 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think probably if you just summarise what
40 they are and then give my lot to Mr. Riley and ------
41
42 MR. RAMPTON: I will start again. The first one is a memorandum
43 relating to an increase in cooking time for the quarter
44 pounder only, not the 10-1, in 1993. That is on the second
45 page of that memorandum. The next document was ------
46
47 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Mr. Rampton, I suggest you keep going. If
48 Mr. Morris, when I rise, has not sufficient copies, he can
49 take it up with Mr. Hill.
50
51 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, the next document is the cousin of a
52 document which is already behind tab 1A of pink VIII which
53 was a United States, as it were, McDonald's audit form for
54 visits to suppliers. This is one from 1991. That is a
55 pro forma. The next one is the McDonald's microbiological
56 specification for chicken McNuggets from 1990. The next
57 one, I am not sure at the moment where this goes -- I do
58 not know if your Lordship has a separate Jarret file -- my
59 Lord, these are Ms. Hovey's time sheets supplied by her
60 employers who are not, of course, Jarret.
