Day 258 - 07 Jun 96 - Page 41


     
     1
     2   Q.   Right.  So are you saying that the photographs were to be
     3        passed on without any kind of labelling or anything like
     4        that?
     5        A.  Yes, that was my understanding, that that is what would
     6        happen.
     7
     8   Q.   Right.
     9
    10   MR. MORRIS:  While that has come up, as it is obviously
    11        something referred to in black and white, unarguable, can
    12        we formally have a copy of that letter accompanying the
    13        photographs from the Plaintiffs?
    14
    15   MR. JUSTICE BELL: What do you say about that?
    16
    17   MR. RAMPTON:  I would have to have a look and see if it exists.
    18        In all probability it is a fax, I should guess.  A letter
    19        from Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, I would guess.  It is obviously
    20        privileged communication, whether it a relevant
    21        communication is another question.  What does it matter how
    22        the Defendants--
    23
    24   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  We will have the argument when you have found
    25        it and have an opportunity to look at it.
    26
    27   MR. RAMPTON:  I will look at it.
    28
    29   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  This witness's evidence is that he does not
    30        know about the letter.
    31        A.  Absolutely.
    32
    33   MS. STEEL:   In the photographs that have been served, there is
    34        some photographs of the demonstration in central London
    35        from November 1991?
    36        A.  Can you direct me to them?
    37
    38   Q.   I can do, but,, I mean, to save time.  If you particularly
    39        want to look at them you can?
    40        A.  Not unless you want me to.
    41
    42   Q.   I was wondering whether they were taken by somebody from
    43        McDonald's or from somebody from the inquiry agents firm,
    44        or what?
    45        A.  No, it would not be from the inquiry agents.
    46
    47   Q.   It is the demonstration in central London?
    48        A.  Yes.  What would normally happen is that Lon Lawrie,
    49        who is a member of the security department and a very
    50        accomplished photographer, took most of our photographs. 
    51        If he was not available, we may have asked for a 
    52        professional photographer to go along, but I cannot help 
    53        you as to who took photographs.
    54
    55   Q.   OK.  You said that you instructed Bishops Investigations?
    56        A.  Yes.
    57
    58   Q.  -- Agency, or whatever you call them, in October 1989?
    59        A.  Yes, they were the second firm.
    60

Prev Next Index