Day 059 - 01 Dec 94 - Page 58


     
     1   Q.   Have you still got the file with your statement in front of
     2        you?
     3        A.  Which one was it?
     4
     5   Q.   It is yellow III.
     6        A.  OK.
     7
     8   Q.   If you could turn to page 2 of the statement?
     9        A.  Right.
    10
    11   Q.   You have said that the Defendants' Particulars of
    12        Justification and Fair Comment that it was not until in or
    13        around May 1990 that McDonald's took its first step towards
    14        developing a waste minimization and recycling programme is
    15        incorrect?
    16        A.  I said an Environmental Task Force was established in
    17        October 1990.  Which part are you referring to, May 1990?
    18
    19   Q.   The paragraph 7 above.
    20        A.  Sorry.  OK.
    21
    22   Q.   So, are you saying that what is wrong with paragraph 7 is
    23        that it should actually be October 1990 rather than May
    24        1990?
    25        A.  No, I was just reading the wrong paragraph.
    26
    27   Q.   No, but I am asking you, in the light of what I asked you a
    28        couple of minutes ago, are you saying that it should be
    29        October 1990?
    30        A.  No, no, it should not be October 1990.
    31
    32   Q.   So, what steps towards developing a waste minimization and
    33        recycling programme did you take before 1990?
    34        A.  I think major steps in terms of recycling as we
    35        outlined this morning.
    36
    37   Q.   What do you mean by that?
    38        A.  We instituted recycled materials in I think it was 1988
    39        in our Nottingham test which we asked the public to recycle
    40        materials in the restaurant which we were then encouraged
    41        to ask Lin Pac to set up a recycling plant to process those
    42        recycling materials.  On the waste minimisation, in terms
    43        of the shortening that we use in the restaurants, as far as
    44        I can remember, and it is not an area I work with
    45        particularly, but we have always minimised waste in that
    46        area.
    47
    48   Q.   I mean, at the moment I am just talking about packaging.
    49        The scheme in Nottingham was also a very limited scheme,
    50        was it not? 
    51        A.  It was four restaurants. 
    52 
    53   Q.   Right.  What happened to the separated waste that you
    54        managed to collect?
    55        A.  In Nottingham?
    56
    57   Q.   Yes.
    58        A.  Nothing happened at that time because there was no
    59        infrastructure to deal with it.
    60

Prev Next Index