Day 147 - 04 Jul 95 - Page 44
1 the Defendants to make an amendment. I have not, of
2 course, had anything from Mr. North.
3
4 MS. STEEL: I do not know that is the correct recollection of
5 what has happened.
6
7 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Check it, but my recollection is,
8 effectively, the same as Mr. Rampton's, that the way it was
9 left was that Mr. North might make an additional statement
10 in relation to that. Query whether you produce such a
11 statement you should be put to seeking leave to amend, or
12 the statement should be deemed to be an additional
13 allegation and, depending upon that, Mr. Rampton might make
14 an application for leave if, indeed, he requires it, to
15 call a witness to answer what Mr. North has to say.
16
17 MS. STEEL: Yes. To be honest, Mr. North has to come back for
18 re-examination on food poisoning anyway. I do remember
19 that we have not re-examined. That is for certain. I was
20 just trying to be helpful actually.
21
22 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I am going to write on the list of
23 outstanding witnesses on past topics is, "query, North".
24
25 MS. STEEL: There is also Jane Brophey to be heard under
26 Defendants; there may be others as well which I will check.
27
28 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes. Let us call it a day will and resume at
29 10.30 in the morning.
30
31 (The court adjourned until the following day).
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
