Day 001 - 28 Jun 94 - Page 22


     
     1        undertaken with the approval and encouragement of other
              members of the group, in particular, of course, these
     2        defendants.
 
     3        What I should like to do now, with your Lordship's leave,
              is show your Lordship, without comment, a number of video
     4        recordings which were taken of demonstrations following
              the one in 1989 at the plaintiffs' head office in East
     5        Finchley.  The dates in question are 16th October 1990,
              21st May 1991, 16th October 1991, 16th October 1992 and
     6        15th October 1993.
 
     7        My Lord, I invite no comments about those.  If your
              Lordship would like the tape to be stopped so that your
     8        Lordship can see it more clearly, or anything like that,
              perhaps your Lordship would indicate to Mr. Hill.  He,
     9        I hope, will be able to control it.  May I sit?
 
    10   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, please do.  I think it is unlikely
              I will want to stop the tape.  Once they have been shown
    11        in public in the presence of all parties, if I wanted to
              look at one again, presumably, I could just take it home
    12        with me?
 
    13   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, they are evidence in the case.
 
    14   MR. MORRIS:  Could we pause for one minute?
 
    15   MR. MORRIS:  It is just that we believe that for a video to be
              brought in as evidence, there has to be a section 9
    16        statement of the photographer or film maker.  We want an
              indication that will happen.
    17
         MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I assumed they will.  If there is any
    18        dispute about it, may be when you see them -- I do not
              know what they contain at all -- there will be an element
    19        of agreement about them, I do not know.
 
    20   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, they were served as part of a list of
              documents.  There is no counter notice challenging their
    21        authenticity.  Evidence will be given about why and when
              they were taken during the course of the case.  If your
    22        Lordship prefers to wait until later on, I do not mind.
 
    23   MR. MORRIS:  We are not objecting to them being shown; I am
              just indicating for later on.
    24
         MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  So this is 16th October 1990, is it?
    25
         MR. RAMPTON:  Yes, it should be. 
    26 
                             (A video was then shown) 
    27
         MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, the next one should be 16th October
    28        1991.
 
    29   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  21st May, I think?
 
    30   MR. RAMPTON:  I am wondering if this is not the same one as we
              have just looked at.  Perhaps we could just go on to the

Prev Next Index