Day 181 - 01 Nov 95 - Page 60


     
     1        can get more out of the figures than I can get.  I have the
     2        benefit of having heard all the background evidence in
     3        relation to McDonald's which Mr. Pearson has not heard.
     4        Even if he had heard it, he would not know what I was going
     5        to find I accepted and what I rejected.  So I suggest you
     6        leave it for argument in due course, Mr. Morris.
     7
     8   MR. MORRIS:  Yes, OK.
     9
    10   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Mr. Pearson's main point is that, adopting
    11        Mr. Rampton's language, RIDDOR accidents are, of course,
    12        important but Mr. Pearson says the problem in the catering
    13        industry is not so much RIDDOR accidents, but those on a
    14        level below which are still not minor but are not serious
    15        enough to qualify compulsory reporting.
    16        A.  Of which there are -----
    17
    18   Q.   That is your main point, Mr. Pearson, is it not?
    19        A.  It is, and of that category of accident there is a
    20        proliferation and I wish I had been provided with a copy of
    21        the Accident Book of the two stores in question, because,
    22        in my view, they did show a proliferation of sub-RIDDOR
    23        incidents, which, you know, we could have looked at in
    24        detail to see what they point to and to see what, you know,
    25        the repeating pattern of accidents is classic in the
    26        catering industry.  I well recall the general pattern in
    27        that store in Narrow Way, wet floors, cut fingers and burns
    28        over the three categories, and certain things can be done
    29        about those, particularly wet floors, but the wet floor
    30        problem occurs and recurs throughout the Accident Book in
    31        that store, in my recollection.
    32
    33        So, you know, I think it is fair to say that the sub-RIDDOR
    34        issue is one which bothers me probably more than anything
    35        in terms of the outcome of hustle which is where you came
    36        in on my questions.
    37
    38   MR. MORRIS:  No further questions.
    39
    40   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, thank you.
    41
    42   MR. MORRIS:  Thank you very much.
    43
    44   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Just pause a moment.  (To the witness):
    45        Mr. Pearson, that concludes your evidence, thank you.  We
    46        have an issue in the case on the question of whether it is
    47        enough, whether by agreement with the Inspectorate or, as a
    48        matter of law, to pay an employee a gross wage at the end
    49        of the week which would be at least as much as you would
    50        get by following each of the Wages Council's steps, time 
    51        and an eighth, time and a quarter, time and a half and so 
    52        on, or whether, as a matter of law, if there were no 
    53        agreement to the contrary, you must go through each of the
    54        hoops set out in the schedules to the order.
    55
    56        What might be helpful to Ms. Steel and Mr. Morris is if you
    57        could notify them, not me, in writing or on the telephone
    58        of any statutory (in which I include regulatory) provision
    59        which would throw light on that, or if you know of any case
    60        where that point has been tested in court, whether of your

Prev Next Index