Day 118 - 01 May 95 - Page 40
1
2 (Luncheon adjournment)
3
4 MS. STEEL: Mr. Nicholson, could you get down the Defendants'
5 list of documents, bundle IV, please? If you could turn to
6 tab 17, it is actually 117? If you turn to the third page
7 of that document there should be pay slips for Siamak
8 Alimi?
9 A. Yes.
10
11 Q. The first one on the page is dated 8th February 1986?
12 A. Yes.
13
14 Q. The hours worked are 88.84?
15 A. Yes.
16
17 Q. Two weeks after that on 22nd February 1986, there is
18 another pay slip and the hours Mr. Alimi worked were 98.94
19 hours?
20 A. Yes.
21
22 Q. If you turn over the following page, the following
23 fortnight he worked 76 hours?
24 A. Yes.
25
26 Q. But then a fortnight after that, 22nd March 1986, it was
27 back up to 82.57 hours?
28 A. Yes.
29
30 Q. Do you think this is particularly unusual?
31 A. Well, I do not know anything about it. I do not know
32 who Mr. Alimi is, but I would say -- is it unusual? Let me
33 just go back over those hours: 82, so that is 41 a
34 week. The 98.94 would be unusual. I do not know. I do
35 not know which store this is, 141?
36
37 Q. I think it is Colchester. I am not sure. The employment
38 form is the first page of the document.
39 A. Is it?
40
41 Q. High Street, Colchester. His employment commenced on 7th
42 October 1985.
43 A. Yes.
44
45 Q. The following page, not from the first page, from where we
46 were, 5th April 1986, again the pay slip says 93.76 hours?
47 A. Yes.
48
49 Q. A fortnight after that is below ---
50 A. Yes.
51
52 Q. -- 78, although it is still possible that one of those two
53 weeks might have been more than 39. The pay slip, the
54 following page, for 3rd May 1986 records 86.98 hours?
55 A. That is right.
56
57 Q. The one after that, 17th May 1986, records 92.36 hours?
58 A. Yes.
59
60 Q. I think the next one after that, 78 hours, is 18th October
