Day 181 - 01 Nov 95 - Page 58
1 included or only given one count instead of five or however
2 many times they come back.
3
4 MR. MORRIS: There was a clarification of a point that did come
5 up, which is the reasons for leaving figures showing the --
6 I do not know if it is a matter of legal point I should
7 make direct -- I have said this before -- the reasons for
8 leaving being 23 per cent for reasons for going back to
9 school or college, these are reasons for each time an
10 employee leaves. Therefore, that indicates, if those are
11 to be taken to be the ones that are actually students
12 returning to college and school, 23 per cent, if they are
13 returning, say, as McDonald's claim, three or four times in
14 a year -----
15
16 MR. JUSTICE BELL: That is a point of argument. I have got the
17 point you make.
18
19 MR. MORRIS: The actual number of students is going to be -- the
20 number of people would be a third or a quarter of that 23
21 per cent and they would be figuring three or four times.
22 So, it could be that there is only eight to 10 per cent of
23 people in that category, but they are figuring three times
24 in the figures. OK. I think we will leave that point.
25
26 You did say -- I was not quite clear about hustle -- that
27 hustle was used -- when you saw your site visits how was
28 hustle applied in the kitchen area?
29 A. Well, in my ------
30
31 MR. JUSTICE BELL: How does this arise out of
32 cross-examination?
33
34 MR. MORRIS: Because Mr. Rampton was not clear whether skip
35 running ------
36
37 MR. RAMPTON: Oh, yes, I was because the witness told me that he
38 preferred his first version, that skip running is in the
39 front area alone.
40
41 MR. MORRIS: Yes, and I am asking the witness to clarify -----
42
43 MR. RAMPTON: So Mr. Morris is now trying to contradict his
44 witness's answer.
45
46 MR. MORRIS: No, I am not. I am asking him, how was hustle
47 applied in the kitchen area, to clarify what you were
48 saying.
49
50 THE WITNESS: Well, from my -- how was hustle applied in the
51 kitchen area? I take it by "kitchen area", you mean back
52 of house, not front of house?
53
54 Q. Yes.
55 A. My evidence, my evidence, is primarily this, that you
56 saw rapid work. I am not claiming on those two site visits
57 that I saw at the back of house in the few moments where I
58 was allowed to stand with the Store Manager, with the
59 Company's solicitor, I am not claiming that I saw in that
60 quiet period in the back of house what I have described as
