Day 260 - 11 Jun 96 - Page 66
1
2 Q. Right. If we just go on to 20th September. You say,
3 "I arrived at 5 Caledonian Road at 19.30 hours. Already
4 present were Helen Steel, Paul Gravett, New Zealand John
5 and Dave Morris. Shortly after, Charlie arrived followed
6 later by Shelley and Jan". Again, Shelley is Michelle
7 Hooker, who is the inquiry agent from Kings; yes?
8 A. Yes.
9
10 Q. And Jan is Frances Tiller, who is an inquiry agent from
11 Kings?
12 A. I do not know that for a fact. I know that she worked
13 for Kings; in what capacity I do not know. I believe she
14 was an administrative assistant.
15
16 Q. Yes, but she would not have been attending meetings of
17 London Greenpeace as an administrative assistant?
18 A. I cannot say.
19
20 Q. All right. But you were aware she was working for Kings,
21 anyway?
22 A. Not at the time.
23
24 Q. You are aware now that Jan was working for Kings?
25 A. I now know, yes.
26
27 Q. "Later arrivals were Albert and Mike". It says in here
28 something about the banal discussions, but then it says,
29 "Most of the time was again taken up with talking about
30 the Greenpeace fayre and who was doing what at the event.
31 Mention was made of Andrew Clarke". Then you go on to say,
32 "At one point Shelley was called away by New Zealand John
33 to go upstairs and return with a message from Jonathan that
34 explained his absence from the meeting". Then you say in
35 brackets, "(This will presumably be covered in her
36 report)". Did you find out what it was that had been said
37 that is related there?
38 A. No.
39
40 Q. Then it says, "Jan managed to volunteer to do the
41 children's creche at the fayre and to obtain Charlie's
42 contact number for liaison purposes". Then you say, "See
43 her report, I should imagine." So, actually, you did know
44 at this time that Jan was working as an inquiry agent?
45 A. I did not know. I was guessing. I had never met her
46 before or since.
47
48 Q. I mean, I am not trying to attack you for this ---
49 A. No.
50
51 Q. -- but you have put "see her report". You know, looking
52 back on it, you must have known that she was an inquiry
53 agent at this time?
54 A. I may have had an idea, but I did not know because
55 I had never met her before.
56
57 Q. But whether or not you had met her, you would have known
58 she worked at Kings because you might have referred to her
59 in a previous report and been told, "Jan is one of our
60 agents"?
