Day 267 - 21 Jun 96 - Page 32
1 A. No, it was fruitless because nothing special was
2 mentioned about McDonald's.
3
4 Q. At the end of that page you say, "Tonight's meeting had no
5 antiMcDonald's campaign involvement".
6 A. That is right.
7
8 Q. "Save for a lady phoning from America and letters".
9 A. That is right.
10
11 Q. OK. If we go over to the 15th February, 1990, page 14 of
12 your notes.
13
14 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Page 80.
15 A. Thank you.
16
17 MS. STEEL: This is the meeting at 5 Caledonian Road and you
18 note that "Helen, Jane, John from the last meeting, Andrew
19 and a new face (bloke) by the name of John; he is LG
20 treasurer".
21 A. I believe it says "last". It has a hole punched
22 there.
23
24 MS. STEEL: OK.
25
26 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You believe it says?
27 A. If it says "last" in the book, I could read it as
28 "first" there.
29
30 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I would have read it as "first", especially
31 seeing the asterisked note. But there we are.
32 A. I cannot make it out.
33
34 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It does not matter.
35
36 MS. STEEL: It is not particularly important whether it is
37 "last". It might be "first" meeting.
38
39 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It is, yes.
40
41 MS. STEEL: Yes, sorry.
42
43 MR. MORRIS: Something about "first" or "last".
44
45 MS. STEEL: Yes. Then you have got a note that John is recorded
46 as Stephen at the first meeting. "Tonight he was called
47 John". He was not actually called John at that meeting
48 either, was he? He was called Jonathan.
49 A. John; Jonathan, yes.
50
51 Q. When you have put that "John is the LG treasurer", that
52 would be what he would have said rather than that he was in
53 charge of all the financial goings-on, would it not?
54 A. I do not recall. It may have been said or implied by
55 somebody.
56
57 Q. When you said he was the treasurer you assumed that he was
58 in charge of all the financial goings-on?
59 A. I do not recall. I have made that note.
60
